School Performance Framework Sample Clauses

School Performance Framework a. The AUTHORIZER has developed Academic and Operational scorecards to measure the CHARTER SCHOOL’s performance. The scorecards shall collectively constitute the AUTHORIZER’s School Performance Framework (hereinafter, the “FRAMEWORK”), which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated into this Agreement by reference. The CHARTER SCHOOL shall annually Meet Expectations on the FRAMEWORK. The FRAMEWORK shall supersede and replace any and all assessment measures, educational goals and objectives, financial operations metrics, and organizational performance metrics set forth in the Application and not explicitly incorporated into the FRAMEWORK. The specific terms, form and requirements of the FRAMEWORK, including any required indicators, measures, metrics, and targets, are determined by the AUTHORIZER and will be binding on the CHARTER SCHOOL.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
School Performance Framework. The School Performance Framework will be a part of the basis, along with the requirements of 70 O.S. § 3-137 (B), (C) & (D), upon which the SBE will decide whether to renew the Contract at the end of its term. The SBE shall comply with the Act’s requirements on charter renewals.
Sample 1Sample 2
School Performance Framework. The performance provisions of this contract are based on a performance framework that clearly sets forth the academic and operational performance indicators, measures, and metrics that will guide the Commission’s evaluations of each public charter school. In addition to state and federal accountability standards, the performance framework should include specific provisions, indicators, measures, and metrics for: See Application, pages 28 – 33, including Attachment #3. • Student academic proficiency, which includes, but is not limited to, performance on state standardized assessments. • Student academic growth, which includes, but is not limited to, performance on state standardized assessments. • Achievement gaps in both proficiency and growth between major student subgroups. • Attendance. • Recurrent enrollment from year to year. • Postsecondary readiness for high school. • Financial performance and sustainability. • Governing Board performance and stewardship, including compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and terms of the charter contract. The performance framework requires the disaggregation of all student performance data by major student subgroups (including gender, race, poverty status, special education status, English learner status, and gifted status). Where the framework has not yet been developed, another approach is to include language along the lines of the following: A set of performance frameworks (singularly, “Performance Framework,” and collectively, the “Performance Frameworks”), shall be incorporated into the Charter as an exhibit. The Performance Frameworks shall supersede and replace any and all assessment measures, education goals and objectives, financial operations metrics, and organization performance metrics set forth in the Application and not explicitly incorporated into the Performance Frameworks. The specific terms, form and requirements of the Performance Frameworks, including any required indicators, measures, metrics, and targets, are maintained and disseminated by the Authorizer and will be binding on the School. Material amendments to the Performance Frameworks shall require approval by the Authorizer. The Commission shall have the authority to collect, analyze, and report all data from state assessments for the School’s students in accordance with the performance framework. The parties acknowledge and agree that the education records of students enrolled in a School are governed by the requirements of the F...
Sample 1
School Performance Framework. The performance provisions of this contract are based on a performance framework that clearly sets forth the academic and operational performance indicators, measures, and metrics that will guide the Commission’s evaluations of each public charter school. In addition to state and federal accountability standards, the performance framework should include specific provisions, indicators, measures, and metrics for: • Student academic proficiency, which includes, but is not limited to, performance on state standardized assessments. • Student academic growth, which includes, but is not limited to, performance on state standardized assessments. • Achievement gaps in both proficiency and growth between major student subgroups. • Attendance. • Recurrent enrollment from year to year. • Postsecondary readiness for high school. • Financial performance and sustainability. • Governing Board performance and stewardship, including compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and terms of the charter contract. The performance framework requires the disaggregation of all student performance data by major student subgroups (including gender, race, poverty status, special education status, English learner status, and gifted status). The Commission shall have the authority to collect, analyze, and report all data from state assessments for the School’s students in accordance with the performance framework. The parties acknowledge and agree that the education records of students enrolled in a School are governed by the requirements of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (“FERPA”), 20 U.S.C. §1232g, and its corresponding regulations. The parties will safeguard personally identifiable information from education records in their possession by developing and adhering to data governance procedures that safeguard against unauthorized access or disclosure of such records in accordance with said law.
Sample 1
School Performance Framework a. Annually, the School and Commission must set performance targets designed to help the School meet applicable federal, state, and Commission expectations. Once agreed upon, those performance targets shall be incorporated into the contract through amendment.
Sample 1
School Performance Framework. In collaboration with OP, the District Superintendent or designee shall develop a School Performance Framework (“SPF”) by which all charter schools, including the School, and programs will be evaluated for purpose of progress monitoring. The metrics specified in the SPF will be congruent the outcome goals specified in Addendum A-3. The SPF will inform District decisions related to campus replacement, restart, or closure; however, the Parties agree that failure to satisfy metrics established by the SPF is not a permissible basis for termination of this Agreement and that OP’s rights under this contract may not be abridged as a consequence of such failure. Rather, Paragraphs 4.05 and 4.06 provide the exclusive bases on which the District may unilaterally terminate this Agreement.
Sample 1

Related to School Performance Framework

  • Performance Framework Service Agreements are a central component of the NSW Health Performance Framework, which documents how the Ministry monitors and assesses the performance of public sector health services to achieve expected service levels, financial performance, governance and other requirements. The performance of a health service is assessed on whether the organisation is meeting the strategic objectives for NSW Health and government, the Premier’s Priorities and performance against key performance indicators. The availability and implementation of governance structures and processes, and whether there has been a significant critical incident or sentinel event also influences the assessment. The Framework sets out responses to performance concerns and management processes that support the achievement of outcomes in accordance with NSW Health and government policies and priorities. Performance concerns will be raised with the Organisation for focused discussion at performance review meetings in line with the NSW Health Performance Framework available at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx.xxx.xx/Xxxxxxxxxxx/Xxxxx/xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx Legislation, governance and performance framework 2021–22 Service Agreement 6

  • Performance Frameworks ‌ The School's academic, organizational, and financial performance under this Charter Contract shall be evaluated using the Academic, Organizational, and Financial Performance Frameworks, respectively, attached as Exhibit B to this Charter Contract. The specific terms, forms, and requirements of the Performance Frameworks, including any required indicators, measures, metrics, and targets, are maintained and disseminated by the Commission and shall be binding on the School. Material changes to the Performance Frameworks shall require approval by the Commission.

  • Key Performance Indicators 10.1 The Supplier shall at all times during the Framework Period comply with the Key Performance Indicators and achieve the KPI Targets set out in Part B of Framework Schedule 2 (Goods and/or Services and Key Performance Indicators).

  • School Performance The School shall achieve an accountability designation of Good Standing or Honor on each of the three sections of the Performance Framework. In the event the School is a party to a third party management contract which includes a deficit protection clause, the School shall be exempt from some or all measures within the financial portion of the Performance Framework. In accordance with Charter School Law, the Authorizer shall renew any charter in which the public charter school met all of the terms of its performance certificate at the time of renewal.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Attainment on Performance Indicators The District will be responsible for overseeing the academic programs offered in its schools and ensuring that those programs meet or exceed state and local expectations for levels of attainment on the statewide performance indicators, as specified in 1 CCR 301-1.

  • PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES 8 A. CONTRACTOR shall achieve performance objectives, tracking and reporting Performance 9 Outcome Objective statistics in monthly programmatic reports, as appropriate. ADMINISTRATOR 10 recognizes that alterations may be necessary to the following services to meet the objectives, and,

  • Service Performance All Services provided by the Agency shall be performed in a diligent, safe, courteous, and timely manner in accordance with this Contract and the Associated federal requirements.

  • Performance Indicators The HSP’s delivery of the Services will be measured by the following Indicators, Targets and where applicable Performance Standards. In the following table: n/a meanç ‘not-appIicabIe’, that there iç no defined Performance Standard for the indicator for the applicable year. tbd means a Target, and a Performance Standard, if applicable, will be determined during the applicable year. INDICATOR CATEGORY INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD Organizational Health and Financial Indicators Debt Service Coverage Ratio (P) 1 c1 Total Margin (P) 0 cO Coordination and Access Indicators Percent Resident Days – Long Stay (E) n/a n/a Wait Time from LHIN Determination of Eligibility to LTC Home Response (M) n/a n/a Long-Term Care Home Refusal Rate (E) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2/3 INDICATOR CATEGORY Quality and Resident Safety Indicators INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator Percentage of Residents Who Fell in the Last 30 days (M) 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD n/a n/a Percentage of Residents Whose Pressure Ulcer Worsened (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents on Antipsychotics Without a Diagnosis of Psychosis (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents in Daily Physical Restraints (M) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2.0 LHIN-Specific Performance Obligations 3/3

  • Modification to Performance Frameworks The Parties acknowledge that specific terms, forms, and requirements of the Performance Frameworks may be modified to the extent required to align with changes to applicable State or federal accountability requirements as set forth in law or policies or based on other circumstances that make assessment based on the existing Performance Framework requirements impracticable. In the event that such modifications are needed, the Commission will make its best effort to apply expectations for school performance in a manner as reasonably consistent with those set forth in the Performance Frameworks and the School's Educational Program as set forth in Exhibit A to this Contract.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.