Table 8. 2.1 Location Additional Annual Leave Per Annum Norfolk Island 3 days Kakadu/ Jabiru 7 days Christmas Island 7 days Uluru – Kata Tjuta 7 days Cocos (Keeling) Islands 7 days
Table 8. 1 presents the escalated capital outlay and support cost esti- mates in each fiscal funding year. A 3.2% annual escalation factor is used for construction costs, and 3.0% is used for support costs, which are escalated to the mid-point of each component. The funds will be allocated in the first year of each phase of development.
Table 8. Object Summary view information in Object Tree Exchange Online Tile All Exchange A view for all Exchange Online objects defined in your Exchange Online environment (see Environment Summary - Exchange Online (All Objects) view).
Table 8. Summary of possible infractions identified by the International Review Panel at its 47th and 48th meetings. TABLA 8. Resumen de posibles infracciones identificadas por el Panel Internacional de Revisión en sus reuniones 47 y 48. INFRACCIONES MAYORES / MAJOR INFRACTIONS: Viaje sin observador Trips without an observer 0 Viajes con lances en delfines sin LMD asignado Trips with dolphin sets but no DML assigned 0 Viajes con capitanes no incluidos en la lista del APICD Trips with captains not on the AIDCP list 2 Viajes sin paño de protección de delfines Trips without a dolphin safety panel 0 Xxxxxx intencionales después de alcanzar el LMD Intentional sets made after reaching the DML 0 Lances o cazas con uso de explosivos (ocurrieron en 1 viaje) Sets or chases with use of explosives (occurred in 1 trip) 2 Lances sobre stocks o tipos de manadas prohibidas Sets on banned stocks or school types 0 Lances sin retroceso Sets without a required backdown 1 Lances con embolsamiento o salabardeo de delfines Sets with dolphin sack-up or brail 1 Xxxxxx sin evitar herir o matar delfines Sets with unavoided dolphin injury or mortality 0 OTRAS INFRACCIONES / OTHER INFRACTIONS: Viajes sin balsa Trips without a required raft 8 Viajes con < 3 lanchas rápidas y/o sin bridas de remolque Trips with < 3 speedboats and/or missing towing bridles 0 Viajes sin reflector de alta intensidad Trips without a required high-intensity floodlight 17 Viajes sin máscaras de buceo Trips without required facemasks 0 Lances nocturnos (ocurrieron en 1 viaje) Night sets (occurred in 1 trip) 1 Xxxxxx sin rescate adicional Sets without required deployment of rescuer 0 Xxxxxx sin rescate después del retroceso Sets without continued rescue effort after backdown 0 Viajes con lances sobre delfines antes de la notificación del LMD Trips with dolphin sets before the DML notification 0 Total 26 Casos de interferencia al observador Cases of observer interference 3 Viajes revisados en estas reuniones Trips reviewed in these meetings 724 Lances sobre delfines revisados en estas reuniones Dolphin sets reviewed in these meetings 10,780 Xxxxxx accidentales revisados en estas reuniones Accidental sets reviewed in these meetings 3 TABLE 9. Responses for six types of possible infractions identified by the International Review Panel at its 47th and 48th meetings.
Table 8. Objective 5: To improve the capacity of Range States and international cooperation and capacity towards the conservation of migratory waterbird species and their flyways Progress Target Indicator Summary and reference 5.1: The membership of the Agreement is expanded AEWA Membership has increased to 75 Parties by MOP5, to 85 Parties by MOP6, and to 90 Parties by MOP 7, with particular focus on Central Asia and the Middle East The number of Contracting Parties (CPs) increased by five from 61 at MOP4 (as of 1 September 2008) to 66 at MOP5 (as of 1 June 2012) with three new CPs from Africa and two from Europe. Only five CPs reported approaching non-CPs to encourage them to accede to the Agreement. Reference: Report of the Depositary (document AEWA/MOP 5.8); Analysis of AEWA National reports for the triennium 2009-2012 (document AEWA/MOP 5.12) 5.2: Sufficient funding for the implementation of the SP is raised from different sources Full funding is raised While no specific assessment of the progress towards the achievement of this target has been made, considering that progress towards a substantive number of other targets has been limited and that in those cases funding has been restricted or not available, it will be justified to assess the progress towards target 5.2 as limited. 5.3: Cooperation with other MEAs and key partners is enhanced At least 5 new MoU/MoC between AEWA and other MEA’s and key partners are established At the AEWA 15th Anniversary Symposium in June 2010, a Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) was signed with the Ramsar Convention, BirdLife International and Wetlands International to continue the join work and partnership established during the Wing over Wetlands (WOW) project (post-WOW partnership). An MoC with Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) is in preparation and will be signed at the Ramsar Convention COP11 in July 2012. An MoC will be signed at MOP5 between the Ramsar Convention and Progress Target Indicator Summary and reference the CMS (also on behalf of its instruments, including AEWA) under which a Joint Work Plan of 2004 between AEWA and Ramsar will be renewed. Reference: Report of the Secretariat (document AEWA/MOP 5.9) 5.4: The Small Grants Fund (SGF) is activated At least 100,000 EUR annually is disbursed to developing countries for implementation of AEWA The first AEWA SGF cycle was launched in 2010 and 93.071 Euros were granted to five projects. The second cycle in 2011 disbursed 43.400 Euros to two projects. The thi...
Table 8. The sensitivity of k-effective (∆k/k%) to the individual isotopes and reactions (non-expanded model) Isotope Reaction Explicit Std. dev. Implicit Std. dev. Total Std. dev. Pu-239 total +3.9768e-01 +1.5606e-05 -2.1150e-03 +1.8012e-07 +3.9557e-01 +1.5608e-05 Pu-239 nubar +6.0333e-01 +3.0177e-05 +0.0000e+00 +0.0000e+00 +6.0333e-01 +3.0177e-05 Pu-239 fission +4.4602e-01 +1.7031e-05 -5.9614e-04 +5.5395e-08 +4.4542e-01 +1.7031e-05 Pu-239 n,gamma -4.3860e-02 +1.9310e-06 -4.1961e-04 +4.2324e-08 -4.4279e-02 +1.9315e-06 U-238 total -2.1519e-01 +1.0339e-05 +6.2981e-03 +5.6012e-07 -2.0889e-01 +1.0354e-05 U-238 n,gamma -2.1612e-01 +9.4246e-06 +6.1604e-04 +6.2406e-08 -2.1550e-01 +9.4248e-06 U-238 n,n’ -8.7828e-02 +6.1230e-06 -3.9247e-05 +2.6095e-09 -8.7867e-02 +6.1230e-06 U-238 fission +8.6768e-02 +7.9636e-06 -3.9836e-06 +3.1910e-10 +8.6764e-02 +7.9636e-06 C-000 total -8.8442e-02 +4.2391e-06 -2.9571e-03 +1.7507e-07 -9.1399e-02 +4.2427e-06 C-000 elastic -8.6072e-02 +4.2325e-06 -2.9582e-03 +1.7506e-07 -8.9030e-02 +4.2362e-06 C-000 n,n’ -1.6362e-03 +1.4335e-07 +1.0224e-06 +1.7121e-10 -1.6352e-03 +1.4335e-07 C-000 n,alpha -7.2137e-04 +6.3386e-08 +1.1122e-07 +1.9709e-11 -7.2126e-04 +6.3386e-08 Pu-241 total +8.0061e-02 +3.2955e-06 -1.5506e-04 +1.0274e-08 +7.9906e-02 +3.2956e-06 Pu-241 nubar +1.1456e-01 +6.1179e-06 +0.0000e+00 +0.0000e+00 +1.1456e-01 +6.1179e-06 Pu-241 fission +8.5860e-02 +3.4924e-06 -6.5054e-05 +4.5634e-09 +8.5795e-02 +3.4924e-06 Pu-241 n,gamma -5.0078e-03 +2.0432e-07 -1.7268e-05 +1.3058e-09 -5.0250e-03 +2.0433e-07 Si-028 total -2.8811e-02 +1.7770e-06 +4.1647e-04 +8.6754e-08 -2.8395e-02 +1.7791e-06 Si-028 elastic -1.3618e-02 +1.3875e-06 +4.1308e-04 +8.6571e-08 -1.3205e-02 +1.3902e-06 Si-028 n,n’ -1.0214e-02 +8.1522e-07 +2.2698e-06 +4.9192e-10 -1.0212e-02 +8.1522e-07 Si-028 n,p -2.2831e-03 +2.3126e-07 +2.4852e-08 +2.0067e-11 -2.2831e-03 +2.3126e-07 Si-028 n,gamma -1.6445e-03 +9.1627e-08 +1.0673e-06 +1.7456e-10 -1.6435e-03 +9.1627e-08 Si-028 n,alpha -1.0532e-03 +1.0413e-07 +1.5507e-08 +9.1150e-12 -1.0531e-03 +1.0413e-07 U-235 total +2.3016e-02 +9.9545e-07 -7.4708e-05 +5.3851e-09 +2.2941e-02 +9.9546e-07 U-235 nubar +3.8331e-02 +2.0709e-06 +0.0000e+00 +0.0000e+00 +3.8331e-02 +2.0709e-06 U-235 fission +2.6824e-02 +1.1220e-06 -2.5208e-05 +1.9470e-09 +2.6799e-02 +1.1220e-06 U-235 n,gamma -3.2909e-03 +1.3518e-07 -1.1682e-05 +8.9889e-10 -3.3026e-03 +1.3518e-07 U-235 n,n’ -5.2961e-04 +3.2699e-08 -4.4976e-07 +3.3979e-11 -5.3006e-04 +3.2699e-08 Pu-240 total +2.1252e-02 +...
Table 8. Properties of the connectorised HC-PBGF samples prepared for experiments at the University of Bristol Figure 8: OTDR trace of HC-PBGF sample #3 (100 m long) showing uniform loss along the fibre length; peaks indicate reflections at the air/glass interfaces Length: 400m Length: 100m Length: 10m Back-to-back Figure 9: Eye diagrams from basic transmission tests over two samples (10 m and 100 m), as well as over the full undivided length of 440 m (before partitioning), carried out using OOK at 10 Gb/s at 1550 nm. The column on the right shows the relevant back-to-back traces The connectorised fibre samples were successfully incorporated in the Data Centre test bed at the University of Bristol and facilitated experiments demonstrating a programmable and reconfigurable disaggregated DCN architecture with low-latency fibre links mimicking inter- and intra-rack interconnections (see Figure 10). This work will be reported at the next ECOC 2015 conference [9].
Table 8. Post-Treatment Period (EOT– Follow-Up) Schedule Post-Treatment Period EOT 30 days from EOT Every 90 days post EOT Scheduling Window (Days) At time of disconti nuation (within 5 days of last dose) 30 ± 5 days from EOT 90 ± 5 days from EOT then every 90 ± 15 days i Post-trial anticancer treatment status X X X Disease/Survival Status a X X X Concomitant Medication Review X X X Assess & Report Adverse Events b X X X Directed Physical Examination X Patient Personalized Clinical Benefit App X Xxxxx Xxxxx and Weight c X ECG X ECOG (see appendix 4) X Serumβ HCG Pregnancy Test for WOCBP X X CBC with Differential X Comprehensive Serum Chemistry Panel X Urinalysis X T3, FT4 and TSH X Tumor Imaging d X CA19-9 e X Central Lab Samples (Blood and Fecal Swabf) X Xf Review contraception use as required by protocol Section 4.7.2 (where applicable) g X X X Optional -Tumor Tissue Collection [Tumor tissue collection for those that consent to this optional collection and undergo a routine care biopsy of their tumor during their participation in the study] j Contact Information Review h X X X
Table 8. Pair-wise generalized squared distance between cluster of genotypes tested at both locations (below diagonal at Haru and above diagonal at Mugi) Cluster I II III IV I - 26.73** 46.91** II 84.58** - 126.24** III 42.6** 57.71** - IV 41.52** 143.23** 149.15** - Figure 1: Dendrogram showing hierarchical clustering patterns of coffee genotypes based on organoleptic traits at Haru Figure 2: Dendrogram showing hierarchical clustering patterns of coffee accessions based- on organoleptic traits at Mugi Conclusion Analysis of variance of combined result manifested that non significant difference among genotypes although 7 and 6 traits of 8 traits showed significant difference at Mugi and Haru respectively. From this it is possible to understand, the existence of significant different among genotypes for most traits at individual location which indicated that the availability of genetic variability among genotypes. The non significant difference among genotypes for combined result caused from high GxE interaction against which genotype mean square tested for significant. Most organoleptic traits showed highly significant different (p<0.01) in GxE interaction. This pointed that inconsistent performance of Coffee genotypes under the study across locations. This forced to divide locations in to area similar in edaphic and climatic condition with Mugi and other area similar to Haru location and focuses to develop Coffee varieties acceptable in quality and met customers need. The 26 coffee genotypes clustered in to 4 and 3 groups at Haru and Mugi. At Mugi accessions under cluster II showed better performance in most cup quality tributes traits which resulted very good in over all cup quality. Accessions under Cluster IV showed better performance in most organoleptic traits at Haru. As a consequence, these accessions are very good in over all cup quality at these locations. The genetic distance among all clusters was highly significantly different (P<0.01) at both locations. This implies that the availability of genetic diversity at individual location which is very important for quality improvement. At Haru, the highest Malanobis distance recorded between Cluster IV and II next to cluster IV and III. Cluster III and I showed highest distance following cluster III and II at Mugi. Thus, priority should be given to accessions under clusters that showed highest Malanobis distance during breeding program. This is due to high heterosis expected during hybridization breeding act...
Table 8. Delivery Plan for Employment Outcomes Performance Framework Partners will continue to improve the delivery plan and performance framework in 2013/14. Long Term Outcomes Intermediate/Short Term Outcomes Inputs/Resources Indicators & Baseline info Improvement/ Targets Widen participation in the labour market across all client groups and across all Highland geographies. (Links to Skills & Employability outcome in Economic Recovery in Section3 above – Workforce skills are matched to the needs of key growth sectors and businesses*) Support large–scale employment growth opportunities at the Nigg Energy Park, Ardersier, Scrabster and the Beechwood Campus Enterprise Areas. (see Section 3 above on economic recovery). See section 3 above See section 3 above Targets over the five year period include 5,000 jobs to be created and sustained. (Develop evidence based sector skills development plans)*. To enable those who are currently removed from the labour market, to move towards and into sustained work. Aligning all employability activity/services around the strategic skills pipeline. The financial baseline will be for 2013/14 to reflect the new SDS Employability Fund Programme. Employment rate (No. of people in employment aged 16-64 years as a percentage of the population aged 16-64 at the Highland level). Increase Improve equality of access to the labour market for all client groups, including disabled Partners to agree how to improve access to good jobs across the social gradient and make it easier for people who are The employment rate for the Highland area and Travel To Work Area Areas (data at SIMD priority area level is not Increase Long Term Outcomes Intermediate/Short Term Outcomes Inputs/Resources Indicators & Baseline info Improvement/ Targets people. disadvantaged in the labour market to obtain and keep work Partners to agree how to develop ‘pathways’ to support people into employment. sufficiently robust to use). The number and % of working age population unemployed and living in Highland in the 15% most deprived data zones in Scotland. The number and % of people supported into employment in Highland in the 15% most deprived data zones in Scotland (data not currently available from DWP) Reduce Increase Increased number of people who are furthest from the labour market taking up opportunities in CPP organisations through employability initiatives. (Criteria and partners TBC) Increase The disabled employment rate - % of employed disabled population aged 16-6...
