Accountability Measures Sample Clauses
Accountability Measures.
a. As a BLM Governance Group, it will be the Preservation Board's duty in accordance with Stipulation 3 above to ▇▇▇▇▇▇ consistency and conformity with BLM policies and procedures. Where problems with implementation are found in one or more states, it will be the Preservation Board's duty to move promptly to recommend corrective actions, in coordination with the appropriate DPO(s).
b. Each state director will prepare an annual report in consultation with the appropriate SHPO(s), outlining the preservation activities conducted under this Agreement. The annual report will be consistent with the BLM's annual Headquarters reporting requirements and will include supplemental information agreed upon by the BLM and SHPO. The state reports will be made available to the public via the BLM state websites, and the BLM will provide a copy of the report to ACHP via email.
c. At least annually, each state director that maintains a BLM-SHPO protocol pursuant to this Agreement or their designee will meet with the SHPO to review the implementation of that BLM-SHPO protocol.
d. The Preservation Board or BLM Headquarters, in consultation with the ACHP and SHPOs, may select one or more certified state, district, or field offices for a detailed field review of this Agreement's implementation. The FPO and the appropriate DPO(s), SHPO(s), and the ACHP will participate in the review and may include other parties as appropriate. Findings and recommendations based on this field review will be provided to the participants, the Director, the state director, and the Preservation Board for appropriate action.
e. The FPO and DPOs will prepare responses to public inquiries for the signature of the Director or a state director regarding inquiries about the BLM's exercise of its authorities and responsibilities under this Agreement, such as the identification, evaluation, and management of resources. Responses will include establishing the facts of the situation and, where needed, recommendations to the Director or state director for corrections or revisions in a practice or procedure.
f. Each meeting of the Preservation Board will be documented by a report. The Preservation Board will post a copy of each report on the national BLM website.
Accountability Measures. The City shall comply with the requirements of Section 53410 of the California Government Code with respect to the deposit and expenditure of the Proceeds of the sale of the Bonds and shall cause the appropriate officer of the City to file a report with the City Council no later than January 31, 2019, and annually thereafter, which shall contain the information required by Section 53411 of the California Government Code with respect to the expenditure of the Proceeds.
Accountability Measures. Tryfacta will establish robust accountability measures to ensure transparency, traceability, and responsibility throughout the AI development and deployment lifecycle. This is done through:
1. Defined Accountability Measures
Accountability Measures. Accountability Action: Non-compliance of this Mentorship Agreement may result in removal from the mentorship program. If we have not received confirmation of you receiving your match within 30 days, you will be dropped from the mentorship program.
Accountability Measures. The annual accountability targets developed by HRSDC are based on the total allocation for EI Part II and the actual results from previous years. The preliminary accountability targets for 2005-06, set out in Table 2, are based on 2004-05 results to-date. The targets may be adjusted once 2004-05 year-end results become available. The LMDA requires a two-phase evaluation framework. Phase one, the formative evaluation has been completed and it indicates clients served by LMDA programs have been successful in achieving employment goals. The summative evaluation should be completed in the summer of 2005. Its main themes will focus on client impacts, program impacts, cost effectiveness, management arrangements, satisfaction levels and lessons learned. Targets, reflected in tables below, are established annually for EI eligible Social Assistance Service Recipients (SARs). EI Clients Served 13,914 EI Clients Returned to Employment 7,675 Unpaid Benefits ($) * (Millions) 19.9 ▪ Budget Allocation (2005-06) is $131,566,000 * Unpaid Benefits, (savings to the EI account) are the EI costs that would have been paid out if the client had not returned to work. The Social Assistance Recipients targets for 2005-06 are distributed as follows: Social Assistance Recipients Served 1,138 832 424 106 2,500 The Regional LMDA Communications Strategy outlines the strategic approach for promotion of the Labour Market Development Agreement, both internally and externally. The strategy will continue to focus on promoting awareness of the benefits accruing from the agreement both among the general public and the employees of the affected federal and provincial departments. Linked to this goal is the need to demonstrate that the agreement is working well as a result of joint collaboration among federal, provincial and local partners. The key external objectives are to: • Increase awareness and promote the success of the LMDA through publicly profiling individuals and community clients. • Promote LMDA programs and services to possible clients and employers, particularly the Targeted Wage Subsidies. • Make the public aware that the overall result of these partnerships is better with more efficient service to residents. The key messages to be brought to the target audiences are: • The mission of the Labour Market Development Agreement is to work with individuals, communities and various stakeholders to assist clients to meet measurable and achievable educational, employment and economic deve...
Accountability Measures. 1. Define accountability measures for AI development and use, including tracking actions, decisions, and changes to the model.
2. Propose mechanisms for auditing AI solutions to ensure continued compliance with ethical standards. Here is the response for the points d(1,2)
Accountability Measures. There are various accountability measures such as cooperation restriction, fines, downgrading, and delisting.
Accountability Measures to establish a committed pipeline of feedback and input on the progress of the role/its work Convene and facilitate public quarterly meetings for the CAB and interested members of the public to relay information, issues, and feedback to UAL Identify a time interval/day that may be convenient for growers where the UAL is available for questions and concerns (i.e., office hours). These times should NOT interfere with standing community events or market opportunities, to the degree possible. For example, the UAL should not/cannot hold virtual or City Hall office hours on Tuesday mornings, as this conflicts with a longstanding Crescent City Farmers Market (CCFM). Office hours may potentially be held, in-person and in coordination with relevant parties, at the following locations which may be convenient for growers: At CCFM, at least one hour prior to the start of market At the USDA Urban Agriculture Office on Bayou Road At community gardens around town Particular effort should be made to hold office hours in coordination with community partners from/in significant agricultural areas and historically disadvantaged or disenfranchised communities such as: the West Bank, New Orleans East, the Lower Ninth ▇▇▇▇ To effectively liaise between the City and growers, as well as between other relevant stakeholders (e.g. non-profits, extension agents, etc.), the liaison agrees to prioritize effective communication in their work. Urban Agriculture Working Group (UAWG): This is the primary vehicle for communication between the urban agriculture community of New Orleans and the City of New Orleans via the UAL. As mentioned in the ‘listening’ clause, this is also the place where the community can offer input on the trajectory of the City’s urban agriculture work, including the work of the UAL. This working group is assembled by the UAL and convened on a quarterly basis. The UAWG is a short term solution as the UAL works on the longer process of establishing a formal Community Advisory Board (CAB). The director of ORS, or designee, should also be in attendance. The UAL is required to report out about the work that they have completed over the preceding quarter, and what they plan to accomplish in the coming quarter, including finances. Outreach communications should be sent to the following at least 2 weeks prior to the quarterly meeting, at a minimum: Food Policy Action Council of New Orleans ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ Greater New Orleans Growers Alliance (GNOGA) Recirculating Farms VEGGI Co...
Accountability Measures a. Annually, The Foundation will provide the following data to CCSD and collaboratively review these data with CCSD.
i. The Foundation will assess the leadership behaviors of participants pre- and post- ExLA Academy using a survey adapted from the Stanford Graduate School of Business Leadership Behavior Grid, which measures critically important leadership domains including the following:
1. Team Leadership.
Accountability Measures. Student performance will be assessed by comparing CEP students to a mutually agreed upon control group according to the criteria listed below. The mutually agreed upon control group must be matched according to a combination of the following factors to be agreed upon between the parties:
1. Both groups enter a non-traditional program between January 1 – 10, 2006. The students will be tested as they enter the program and as they leave. Students eligible for referral are in grades 6-12, have been referred for violations of the code of student conduct and are also academically low-performing (i.e., low performers on state skills tests, reading two or more years below grade level, have been retained one or more times in grade and are not on track to graduate with their kindergarten cohort).
2. Gender match
3. From the same community environment
4. Race/Ethnic group
5. Free/reduced lunch status
6. Age to grade
7. Current year repeaters are matched for FCAT scores
8. FCAT scores are the same in reading and math
9. Attendance patterns the same
10. Enrolled in a comprehension or core academic program 11. LEP students are matched to LEP students