Common use of Adjustment Due to Impairment of Pooled Patents Clause in Contracts

Adjustment Due to Impairment of Pooled Patents. If one or more key Patents within the Patent Pool are held invalid so as to be or otherwise become unenforceable in a country, then the Parties shall engage in good faith renegotiation of the Minimum Payment amounts set forth in Section 3.5(a) with the intention of reducing those minimum amounts commensurate with the impact of such an event in such country on the market. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions of this Section 3.5(b)(v) shall not be applicable if one or more key Patents within the Patent Pool are held invalid so as to be or otherwise become unenforceable in a country as a result of a challenge by an Illumina Party pursuant to Section 4.2.2(e) of the Settlement Agreement and the Illumina Party controlled, participated in, or assisted (other than being named as a nominal party or a real party in interest, or paying or reimbursing costs, or taking an action that it is required to take under a University License as set forth in Schedule 3.5(b)(v)) in such challenge The provisions of Section 3.5(b) to establish a floor for adjustments shall not be applicable to this Section 3.5(b)(v).

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Pooled Patents Agreement (Illumina Inc), Pooled Patents Agreement (Sequenom Inc)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Adjustment Due to Impairment of Pooled Patents. If one or more key Patents within the Patent Pool are held invalid so as to be or otherwise become unenforceable in a country, then the Parties shall engage in good faith renegotiation of the Minimum Payment amounts set forth in Section 3.5(a) with the intention of reducing those minimum amounts commensurate with the impact of such an event in such country on the ***Confidential Treatment Requested 40 market. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions of this Section 3.5(b)(v) shall not be applicable if one or more key Patents within the Patent Pool are held invalid so as to be or otherwise become unenforceable in a country as a result of a challenge by an Illumina Party pursuant to Section 4.2.2(e) of the Settlement Agreement and the Illumina Party controlled, participated in, or assisted (other than being named as a nominal party or a real party in interest, or paying or reimbursing costs, or taking an action that it is required to take under a University License as set forth in Schedule 3.5(b)(v)) in such challenge The provisions of Section 3.5(b) to establish a floor for adjustments shall not be applicable to this Section 3.5(b)(v).

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Pooled Patents Agreement (Sequenom Inc)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Adjustment Due to Impairment of Pooled Patents. If one or more key Patents within the Patent Pool are held invalid so as to be or otherwise become unenforceable in a country, then the Parties shall engage in good faith renegotiation of the Minimum Payment amounts set forth in Section 3.5(a) with the intention of reducing those minimum amounts commensurate with the impact of such an event in such country on the 39 market. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions of this Section 3.5(b)(v) shall not be applicable if one or more key Patents within the Patent Pool are held invalid so as to be or otherwise become unenforceable in a country as a result of a challenge by an Illumina Party pursuant to Section 4.2.2(e) of the Settlement Agreement and the Illumina Party controlled, participated in, or assisted (other than being named as a nominal party or a real party in interest, or paying or reimbursing costs, or taking an action that it is required to take under a University License as set forth in Schedule 3.5(b)(v)) in such challenge The provisions of Section 3.5(b) to establish a floor for adjustments shall not be applicable to this Section 3.5(b)(v).

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Pooled Patents Agreement (Sequenom Inc)

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.