Common use of ADOT Consultant Clause in Contracts

ADOT Consultant. ADOT has a specific conflict of interest policy for the Project respecting ADOT consultants and their affiliates. A copy of the current policy is provided as Attachment 1 to this RFQ. Proposers shall comply with this conflict of interest policy. Exceptions to this policy may be granted by ADOT, upon written request from such person or firm, if it is determined that the person’s or firm’s involvement is in the best interest of the public and does not constitute an unfair advantage. Proposer teams seeking such exception shall submit such written request as soon as possible (optimally by September 20, 2017) because ADOT shall not extend the SOQ Due Date or be responsible for any inability or failure to respond prior to the SOQ Due Date to any such request. ADOT has engaged a number of consultants to assist and participate in the Project development stages, as well as assist ADOT during the procurement process for the Project. Proposer is prohibited from teaming with, receiving any advice, or discussing (except discussing in a forum established pursuant to the RFP) any aspect relating to the Project or the procurement of the Project with any such consultants, including:  HDR Engineering, Inc.;  KPMG LLP;  Nossaman LLP;  WSP Global Inc.;  Sperry Capital; and  CDM Xxxxx. ADOT may disqualify a Proposer, and refuse to enter into the P3 Agreement with the apparent best value Proposer if ADOT determines that:

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: apps.azdot.gov, apps.azdot.gov

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

ADOT Consultant. ADOT has a specific conflict of interest policy for the Project respecting ADOT consultants and their affiliates. A copy of the current policy is provided as Attachment 1 to this RFQ. Proposers shall comply with this conflict of interest policy. Exceptions to this policy may be granted by ADOT, upon written request from such person or firm, if it is determined that the person’s or firm’s involvement is in the best interest of the public and does not constitute an unfair advantage. Proposer teams seeking such exception shall submit such written request as soon as possible (optimally by September 2018, 2017) because ADOT shall not extend the SOQ Due Date or be responsible for any inability or failure to respond prior to the SOQ Due Date to any such request. ADOT has engaged a number of consultants to assist and participate in the Project development stages, as well as assist ADOT during the procurement process for the Project. Proposer is prohibited from teaming with, receiving any advice, or discussing (except discussing in a forum established pursuant to the RFP) any aspect relating to the Project or the procurement of the Project with any such consultants, including: HDR Engineering, Inc.; KPMG LLP; Nossaman LLP; WSP Global Inc.; Sperry Capital; and CDM Xxxxx. ADOT may disqualify a Proposer, and refuse to enter into the P3 Agreement with the apparent best value Proposer if ADOT determines that:

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: apps.azdot.gov

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

ADOT Consultant. ADOT has a specific conflict of interest policy for the Project respecting ADOT consultants and their affiliates. A copy of the current policy is provided as Attachment 1 to this RFQ. Proposers shall comply with this conflict of interest policy. Exceptions to this policy may be granted by ADOT, upon written request from such person or firm, if it is determined that the person’s or firm’s involvement is in the best interest of the public and does not constitute an unfair advantage. Proposer teams seeking such exception shall submit such written request as soon as possible (optimally by September 2018,20, 2017) because ADOT shall not extend the SOQ Due Date or be responsible for any inability or failure to respond prior to the SOQ Due Date to any such request. ADOT has engaged a number of consultants to assist and participate in the Project development stages, as well as assist ADOT during the procurement process for the Project. Proposer is prohibited from teaming with, receiving any advice, or discussing (except discussing in a forum established pursuant to the RFP) any aspect relating to the Project or the procurement of the Project with any such consultants, including:  HDR Engineering, Inc.;  KPMG LLP;  Nossaman LLP;  WSP Global Inc.;  Sperry Capital; and  CDM Xxxxx. ADOT may disqualify a Proposer, and refuse to enter into the P3 Agreement with the apparent best value Proposer if ADOT determines that:

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: apps.azdot.gov

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.