Applicability scenarios for Data Centres Sample Clauses

Applicability scenarios for Data Centres. Section 3.3 describes three possible deployment models and motivates the choice of the centralized model for the COSIGN DCN Control Plane, which is deployed at the DC operator domain with a single SDN controller. However, the adoption of this principle at the DC operator level, does not prevent its customers to deploy their own SDN controllers for operating their own virtual infrastructures. This option has been briefly mentioned for the VDC use-case in section 3.2, and it is further explained in the pictures below. Figure 9. Deployment for the use case on provisioning of overlay virtual networks. Figure 9 shows a typical deployment for the use case dedicated to the provisioning of overlay virtual networks. In this use case, the customer is interested only in a suitable environment to run its applications, independently on the specific topology of the virtual network infrastructures or the connectivity that allows the communication between the VMs. For this reason, the only SDN controller involved in this use case is the one which operates the DCN (SDN controller 1 in the picture). This controller is managed by the DC operator and provides the whole set of COSIGN Control Plane services: optical resource virtualization, optical infrastructure virtualization and provisioning of end-to-end connectivity, while upper layer SDN applications implement the overlay- based network virtualization which expose its services to the customer.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Applicability scenarios for Data Centres. Section 3.3 describes three possible deployment models and motivates the choice of the centralized model for the COSIGN DCN Control Plane, which is deployed at the DC operator domain with a single SDN controller. However, the adoption of this principle at the DC operator level, does not prevent its customers to deploy their own SDN controllers for operating their own virtual infrastructures. This option has been briefly mentioned for the VDC use case in Section 3.2, and it is further explained in the pictures below. Figure 9 – Deployment for the use case on provisioning of overlay virtual networks Figure 9 shows a typical deployment for the use case dedicated to the provisioning of overlay virtual networks. In this use case, the customer is interested only in a suitable environment to run its applications, independently on the specific topology of the virtual network infrastructures or the connectivity that allows the communication between the VMs. For this reason, the only SDN controller involved in this use case is the one which operates the DCN (SDN controller 1 in the picture). This controller is managed by the DC operator and provides the whole set of COSIGN Control Plane services: optical resource virtualization, optical infrastructure virtualization and provisioning of end-to-end connectivity, while upper layer SDN applications implement the overlay- based network virtualization which expose its services to the customer. Figure 10 – Deployment for the VDC use case On the other hand, in the VDC use case the customers are interested in a programmable virtual infrastructure which may be operated and configured using a dedicated control plane, external from the one which runs over the physical DCN. A possible solution to control this virtual infrastructure is to use again an SDN controller, resulting in a hierarchy with two levels of SDN controllers (see Figure 10). In this scenario, we can identify multiple trust domains. The first one is associated to the DC operator and corresponds to the SDN controller at the bottom (SDN controller 1 in the picture) which operates the DCN physical infrastructure. It implements the optical resource virtualization and offer the service for the on-demand provisioning of programmable virtual optical infrastructures. On top of that, N trust domains are associated to the tenants renting the virtual network slices. Each tenant deploys its own SDN controller (represented in green in the picture) to manage its network slice,...

Related to Applicability scenarios for Data Centres

  • Technical Requirements for SCPs/Databases 10.5.3.1 BellSouth shall provide physical access to SCPs through the SS7 network and protocols with TCAP as the application layer protocol.

  • APPLICABILITY TO SUBCONTRACTORS Respondent agrees that all contracts it awards pursuant to the contract awarded as a result of this Agreement will be bound by the foregoing terms and conditions.

  • Scope and Applicability 1.1 This Data Processing Agreement applies to Oracle’s Processing of Personal Information on Your behalf as a Processor for the provision of the Services specified in Your Services Agreement. Unless otherwise expressly stated in Your Services Agreement, this version of the Data Processing Agreement shall be effective and remain in force for the term of Your Services Agreement.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • DATA USED FOR CALCULATIONS The calculations for payments under this Agreement shall be initially based upon the valuations that are placed upon all taxable property in the District, including the Applicant’s Qualified Property, by the Appraisal District in its annual certified tax roll submitted to the District for each Tax Year pursuant to TEXAS TAX CODE § 26.01 on or about July 25 of each year of this Agreement. Immediately upon receipt of the valuation information by the District, the District shall submit the valuation information to the Third Party selected and appointed under Section 4.3. The certified tax roll data shall form the basis of the calculation of any and all amounts due under this Agreement. All other data utilized by the Third Party to make the calculations contemplated by this Agreement shall be based upon the best available current estimates. The data utilized by the Third Party shall be adjusted from time to time by the Third Party to reflect actual amounts, subsequent adjustments by the Appraisal District to the District’s certified tax roll or any other changes in student counts, tax collections, or other data.

  • Technical Feasibility of String While ICANN has encouraged and will continue to encourage universal acceptance of all top-­‐level domain strings across the Internet, certain top-­‐level domain strings may encounter difficulty in acceptance by ISPs and webhosters and/or validation by web applications. Registry Operator shall be responsible for ensuring to its satisfaction the technical feasibility of the TLD string prior to entering into this Agreement.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference. Adherence to these accessible technology standards is one way to ensure compliance with the College’s underlying legal obligations to ensure that people with disabilities are able to acquire the same information, engage in the same interactions, and enjoy the same benefits and services within the same timeframe as their nondisabled peers, with substantially equivalent ease of use; that they are not excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in any College programs, services, and activities delivered online, as required by Section 504 and the ADA and their implementing regulations; and that they receive effective communication of the College’s programs, services, and activities delivered online.

  • Step 3 – Contract Language Disputes (a) If a grievance concerning the interpretation or application of this Agreement, other than a grievance alleging that a disciplinary action (reduction in base pay, demotion, involuntary transfer of more than 50 miles by highway, suspension, or dismissal) was taken without cause, is not resolved at Step 2, the grievant or designated representative may appeal the grievance by submitting it to the Office Manager for the Office of the General Counsel of the Department of Management Services, 0000 Xxxxxxxxx Xxx, Xxxxx 000, Xxxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, 00000-0950, or by email to: Xxxx0Xxxxxxxxxx@xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx within 15 days following receipt of the decision at Step 2. The grievance shall include a copy of the grievance forms submitted at Steps 1 and 2, together with all written responses and documents in support of the grievance. When the grievance is eligible for initiation at Step 3, the grievance shall be filed on the grievance form contained in Appendix B of this Contract, setting forth specifically the facts on which the grievance is based, the specific provision(s) of the Contract allegedly violated, and the relief requested.

  • Technical Standards Applicable to a Wind Generating Plant i. Low Voltage Ride-Through (LVRT) Capability A wind generating plant shall be able to remain online during voltage disturbances up to the time periods and associated voltage levels set forth in the standard below. The LVRT standard provides for a transition period standard and a post-transition period standard.

  • Updated Information Submission by Interconnection Customer The updated information submission by the Interconnection Customer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. The Interconnection Customer shall submit a completed copy of the Electric Generating Unit data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the LGIP. It shall also include any additional information provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies. Information in this submission shall be the most current Electric Generating Unit design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with the Participating TO and CAISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Interconnection Customer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information. If the Interconnection Customer's data is materially different from what was originally provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies, then the Participating TO and the CAISO will conduct appropriate studies pursuant to the LGIP to determine the impact on the Participating TO’s Transmission System and affected portions of the CAISO Controlled Grid based on the actual data submitted pursuant to this Article 24.3. The Interconnection Customer shall not begin Trial Operation until such studies are completed and all other requirements of this LGIA are satisfied.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.