Common use of Authorized Use of eSignature Clause in Contracts

Authorized Use of eSignature. Electronic signatures on Releases (as defined in Section 6.1 below) must be executed by the Claimants. The Law Firm may not execute an electronic signature on behalf of a Claimant. The Facility may collect data regarding the IP address of the eSignature user. If IP address data collected by the Facility indicates improper use of the eSignature process, the Facility or the WRG Trust may investigate such behavior and, in addition to the remedies available pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Agreement, deny access to the eSignature process to Claimants represented by the Law Firm. It is assumed that each Claimant will execute a Release from a unique IP address. An example of activity that may indicate improper use of the eSignature process would be the execution of multiple electronic signatures on the same computer, including a computer identified as being in the Law Firm’s office. Upon recognition of such activity, the Facility or the WRG Trust may make inquiries into whether, in fact, Claimants were physically present at the Law Firm and used the Law Firm’s computer to execute the electronic signatures (an authorized use of the eSignature process), or if, in fact, a member or members of the Law Firm’s staff executed the electronic signatures on behalf of the Claimants (an unauthorized use of the eSignature process).

Authorized Use of eSignature. Electronic signatures on Releases (as defined in Section 6.1 below) must be executed by the Claimants. The Law Firm may not execute an electronic signature on behalf of a Claimant. The Facility may collect data regarding the IP address of the eSignature user. If IP address data collected by the Facility indicates improper use of the eSignature process, the Facility or the WRG Flintkote Trust may investigate such behavior and, in addition to the remedies available pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Agreement, deny access to the eSignature process to Claimants represented by the Law Firm. It is assumed that each Claimant will execute a Release from a unique IP address. An example of activity that may indicate improper use of the eSignature process would be the execution of multiple electronic signatures on the same computer, including a computer identified as being in the Law Firm’s office. Upon recognition of such activity, the Facility or the WRG Flintkote Trust may make inquiries into whether, in fact, Claimants were physically present at the Law Firm and used the Law Firm’s computer to execute the electronic signatures (an authorized use of the eSignature process), or if, in fact, a member or members of the Law Firm’s staff executed the electronic signatures on behalf of the Claimants (an unauthorized use of the eSignature process).

Authorized Use of eSignature. Electronic signatures on Releases (as defined in definedin Section 6.1 below) must be executed by the Claimants. The Law Firm may not execute an electronic signature on behalf of a Claimant. The Facility may collect data regarding the IP address IPaddress of the eSignature user. If IP address data collected by the Facility indicates improper use of the eSignature process, the Facility or the WRG FM Trust may investigate such behavior and, in addition to the remedies available pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Agreement, deny access to the eSignature process to Claimants represented by the Law Firm. It is assumed that each Claimant will execute a Release from a unique IP address. An example of activity that may indicate improper use of the eSignature process would be the execution of multiple electronic signatures on the same computer, including a computer identified as being in the Law Firm’s office. Upon recognition of such activity, the Facility or the WRG FM Trust may make inquiries into whether, in fact, Claimants were physically present at the Law Firm and used the Law Firm’s computer to execute the electronic signatures (an authorized use of the eSignature process), or if, in fact, a member or members of the Law Firm’s staff executed the electronic signatures on behalf of the Claimants (an unauthorized use of the eSignature process).

Authorized Use of eSignature. Electronic signatures on Releases (as defined in Section 6.1 below) must be executed by the Claimants. The Law Firm may not execute an electronic signature on behalf of a Claimant. The Facility may collect data regarding the IP address of the eSignature user. If IP address data collected by the Facility indicates improper use of the eSignature process, the Facility or the WRG PCC Trust may investigate such behavior and, in addition to the remedies available pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Agreement, deny access to the eSignature process to Claimants represented by the Law Firm. It is assumed that each Claimant will execute a Release from a unique IP address. An example of activity that may indicate improper use of the eSignature process would be the execution of multiple electronic signatures on the same computer, including a computer identified as being in the Law Firm’s office. Upon recognition of such activity, the Facility or the WRG PCC Trust may make inquiries into whether, in fact, Claimants were physically present at the Law Firm and used the Law Firm’s computer to execute the electronic signatures (an authorized use of the eSignature process), or if, in fact, a member or members of the Law Firm’s staff executed the electronic signatures on behalf of the Claimants (an unauthorized use of the eSignature process).