Brussels instruments Sample Clauses

Brussels instruments. It is unlikely that a non-unique agreement that nominates two or more courts as having exclusive jurisdiction for both parties (the second type referred to above) would be enforceable as an exclusive agreement under the Recast given that exclusivity requires the jurisdiction of all other competent Member State courts to be excluded for each party.64 59 Brand and Herrup, supra n 22, 17. 00 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxx 1(1) and 3(a). 61 In the European Union, the Brussels I Recast will apply to all conflicting exclusive agreements in Member States. 62 Xxxxxxx and Dogauchi, supra n 18, para 103. 63 See Ibid, paras 103-104; T Xxxxxxx, Choice of Court Agreements under the European and International Instruments (Oxford University Press, 2013), 144; Brand and Herrup, supra n 22, 43. 64 See supra n 28 and accompanying text.‌ In Meeth v Glacetal, the CJEU interpreted the Brussels Convention in light of the first type of non-unique exclusive clause that nominated two courts 65 in different jurisdictions as having exclusive jurisdiction, depending on which party was claimant. It provided that “If Meeth sues Glacetal, the French courts alone shall have jurisdiction. If Glacetal sues Meeth, the German courts alone shall have jurisdiction”.66 The CJEU ruled that the clause was permissible on the basis that it excluded the “other optional attributions of jurisdiction” under the Brussels Convention67 and because the Brussels Convention recognised “the independent will of the parties to a contract in deciding which courts are to have jurisdiction”.68 The clause differentiated between the parties but did not discriminate against either party,69 in that each had the same rights to claim only in the other party’s home courts and to be sued only in their home courts.70 This is less problematic than the second type of non-unique “exclusive” agreement because it is entirely exclusive from the perspective of each party: each party knows the only jurisdiction in which it can initiate and may be obliged to defend proceedings, and the jurisdiction of other competent Member State courts is excluded for each party. In that sense, a Meeth v Glacetal clause is functionally equivalent to a unique exclusive agreement. For that reason, this type of clause would probably be regarded as effective under the Recast.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Brussels instruments

  • Documents, Instruments, and Chattel Paper The Borrower represents and warrants to the Agent and the Lenders that (a) all documents, instruments, and chattel paper describing, evidencing, or constituting Collateral, and all signatures and endorsements thereon, are and will be complete, valid, and genuine, and (b) all goods evidenced by such documents, instruments, and chattel paper are and will be owned by the Borrower, free and clear of all Liens other than Permitted Liens.

  • Risk Management Instruments Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect, all derivative instruments, including, swaps, caps, floors and option agreements, whether entered into for the Company’s own account, or for the account of one or more of the Company Subsidiaries or its or their customers, were entered into (i) only in the ordinary course of business, (ii) in accordance with prudent practices and in all material respects with all applicable laws, rules, regulations and regulatory policies and (iii) with counterparties believed to be financially responsible at the time; and each of such instruments constitutes the valid and legally binding obligation of the Company or one of the Company Subsidiaries, enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as may be limited by the Bankruptcy Exceptions. Neither the Company or the Company Subsidiaries, nor, to the knowledge of the Company, any other party thereto, is in breach of any of its obligations under any such agreement or arrangement other than such breaches that would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.

  • Omnibus Instrument; Execution and Incorporation of Terms The parties to this Coordination Agreement will enter into this Coordination Agreement by executing the Omnibus Instrument. By executing the Omnibus Instrument, each party hereto agrees that this Coordination Agreement will constitute a legal, valid and binding agreement by and among the Trust, Principal Life, PFG, PFSI, the Custodian and the Indenture Trustee. All terms relating to the Trust or the Notes not otherwise included in this Coordination Agreement will be as specified in the Omnibus Instrument or Pricing Supplement, as indicated herein.

  • Other Instruments The parties hereto covenant and agree that they will execute each such other and further instruments and documents as are or may become reasonably necessary or convenient to effectuate and carry out the purposes of this Agreement.

  • Succession Instruments Any substitute trustee appointed pursuant to any of the provisions hereof shall, without any further act, deed, or conveyance, become vested with all the estates, properties, rights, powers, and trusts of its or his/her predecessor in the rights hereunder with like effect as if originally named as Trustee herein; but nevertheless, upon the written request of Lender or of the substitute trustee, the Trustee ceasing to act shall execute and deliver any instrument transferring to such substitute trustee, upon the trusts herein expressed, all the estates, properties, rights, powers, and trusts of the Trustee so ceasing to act, and shall duly assign, transfer and deliver any of the property and moneys held by such Trustee to the substitute trustee so appointed in the Trustee’s place.

  • Majority Lenders’ instructions (a) Unless a contrary indication appears in a Finance Document, the Agent shall (i) exercise any right, power, authority or discretion vested in it as Agent in accordance with any instructions given to it by the Majority Lenders (or, if so instructed by the Majority Lenders, refrain from exercising any right, power, authority or discretion vested in it as Agent) and (ii) not be liable for any act (or omission) if it acts (or refrains from taking any action) in accordance with an instruction of the Majority Lenders. (b) Unless a contrary indication appears in a Finance Document, any instructions given by the Majority Lenders will be binding on all the Finance Parties. (c) The Agent may refrain from acting in accordance with the instructions of the Majority Lenders (or, if appropriate, the Lenders) until it has received such security as it may require for any cost, loss or liability (together with any associated VAT) which it may incur in complying with the instructions. (d) In the absence of instructions from the Majority Lenders, (or, if appropriate, the Lenders) the Agent may act (or refrain from taking action) as it considers to be in the best interest of the Lenders. (e) The Agent is not authorised to act on behalf of a Lender (without first obtaining that Lender’s consent) in any legal or arbitration proceedings relating to any Finance Document.

  • Interest Rate Risk Management Instruments (a) All interest rate swaps, caps, floors and option agreements and other interest rate risk management arrangements to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which any of their properties or assets may be bound were entered into in the Ordinary Course of Business and in accordance with prudent banking practice and applicable rules, regulations and policies of Company Regulatory Agencies and with counterparties believed to be financially responsible at the time, and are legal, valid and binding obligations enforceable in accordance with their terms (except as may be limited by general principles of equity, whether applied in a court of law or a court of equity, and by bankruptcy, insolvency and similar Laws affecting creditors’ rights and remedies generally), and are in full force and effect. The Company and each of its Subsidiaries has duly performed in all material respects all of its obligations thereunder to the extent that such obligations to perform have accrued; and, to the Knowledge of the Company, there are no breaches, violations or defaults or allegations or assertions of such by any party thereunder.

  • Further Instruments The parties hereto agree to execute such further instruments and to take such further action as may reasonably be necessary to carry out the intent of this Agreement.

  • Custodian's Acts Without Instructions Unless and until Custodian receives an officers' certificate to the contrary, Custodian shall: (a) present for payment all coupons and other income items held by it for the account of the Fund, which call for payment upon presentation and hold the cash received by it upon such payment for the account of the Fund; (b) collect interest and cash dividends received, with notice to the Fund, for the account of the Fund; (c) hold for the account of the Fund hereunder all stock dividends, rights and similar securities issued with respect to any securities held by it hereunder; and (d) execute, as agent on behalf of the Fund, all necessary ownership certificates required by the Internal Revenue Code or the Income Tax Regulations of the United States Treasury Department or under the laws of any state now or hereafter in effect, inserting the Fund's name on such certificates as the owner of the securities covered thereby, to the extent it may lawfully do so.

  • Ambiguous Instructions In the event that a Submission contains terms that differ from the information provided in the telephone call at the time of issuance of the Submission Number, the Trust Representative will attempt to contact the Participant to request confirmation of the terms of the order. If an Authorized Person confirms the terms as they appear in the Submission, the Submission will be accepted and processed. If an Authorized Person contradicts its terms, the Submission will be deemed invalid, and a corrected Submission must be received by the Transfer Agent, as applicable, not later than the earlier of (i) within 15 minutes of such contact with the Participant or (ii) 15 minutes after the NYSE Closing Time. If the Trust Representative is not able to contact an Authorized Person, then the Submission shall be accepted and processed in accordance with its terms notwithstanding any inconsistency from the terms of the telephone information. In the event that a Submission contains terms that are illegible, the Submission will be deemed invalid and the Trust Representative will attempt to contact the Participant to request retransmission of the Submission. A corrected Submission must be received by the Transfer Agent, as applicable, not later than the earlier of (i) within 15 minutes of such contact with the Participant or (ii) 15 minutes after the NYSE Closing Time.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!