Champaign, Illinois — Explosion Sample Clauses

Champaign, Illinois — Explosion. On July 9, 2003, there was an explosion at 0000 Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx, which was the former Cerion Technologies location. The explosion occurred when employees of Xxxx Construction, Mr. Jean and Xx. Xxxxxx, were performing demolition in a 5,000 sq. ft. area. The explosion allegedly occurred when the two men used a fire extinguisher to put out a fire that started when they cut a pipe with an acetylene torch. The State Fire Xxxxxxxx believes the two men ignited aluminum dust that was in the duct work and filter unit. Claimants allege the aluminum dust was left behind by the most recent tenant and former Nashua subsidiary, Cerion Technologies Inc. The explosion and fire caused injuries to the two men with Mr. Jean subsequently dying from his injuries. In addition, significant property damage occurred. Nashua was notified by attorneys for Mr. Jean, Xx. Xxxxxx, and the property insurance carrier, Selective Insurance Co., of claims against Nashua Corporation. A lawsuit has been filed on behalf of Mr. Jean naming Cerion Technologies as the defendant. On May 11, 2004, Nashua was named as a defendant in a suit relating to injuries caused in the explosion. Other defendants named were Cerion Technologies Liquidating Trust, Cerion Technologies, Inc., Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx and Xxxxx X. Xxxx. Nashua immediately notified our X.X. xxxxxxx, Travelers, of the action. Sonnenschein, Nath & Xxxxxxxxx has been retained by Travelers to defend Nashua and Xx. Xxxxxxxxx. A second suit naming Nashua Corporation as a defendant in a wrongful death action relating to the deceased individual, Mr. Jean, was received on June 7, 2004. Nashua does not believe it has responsibility in that the ownership of the building in question was transferred by Nashua to Cerion Technologies Inc. in 1996 and subsequently Cerion Liquidating Trust sold the building “as is, where is” to its current owner, Xxxxx Xxxx. The court has agreed to consolidate both cases during the discovery phase and has agreed to allow Xx. Xxxx to add additional defendants. Our attorneys believe the Company has strong legal defenses. Discovery and depositions continue. Once discovery is complete, the Company’s lawyers are considering filing motions for summary judgment requesting the removal of Nashua Corporation as a defendant in this case. On May 16, 2006, the complaint against Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx was dismissed without prejudice. Counterclaims against Xx. Xxxxxxxxx have also been dismissed. The court h...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Champaign, Illinois — Explosion

  • Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act The Mortgagor has not notified the Seller, and the Seller has no knowledge of any relief requested or allowed to the Mortgagor under the Relief Act or any similar state statute;

  • Soldiers' and Sailors' Relief Act The Mortgagor has not notified the Company, and the Company has no knowledge of any relief requested or allowed to the Mortgagor under the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940;

  • Massachusetts Business Trust With respect to any Fund which is a party to this Agreement and which is organized as a Massachusetts business trust, the term “Fund” means and refers to the trustees from time to time serving under the applicable trust agreement of such trust, as the same may be amended from time to time (the ‘Declaration of Trust”). It is expressly agreed that the obligations of any such Fund hereunder shall not be binding upon any of the trustees, shareholders, nominees, officers, agents or employees of the Fund personally, but bind only the trust property of the Fund as set forth in the applicable Declaration of Trust. In the case of each Fund which is a Massachusetts business trust (in each case, a “Trust”), the execution and delivery of this Agreement on behalf of the Trust has been authorized by the trustees, and signed by an authorized officer, of the Trust, in each case acting in such capacity and not individually, and neither such authorization by the trustees nor such execution and delivery by such officer shall be deemed to have been made by any of them individually, but shall bind only the trust property of the Trust as provided in its Declaration of Trust.

  • Earthquake If Lender requires earthquake Insurance, the amount of coverage will be equal to the greater of the following:

  • Earthquake Insurance If Lessor desires to obtain some form of earthquake insurance in the future, if and when available, on terms acceptable to Lessor as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of Lessor, then as a condition of Lessor agreeing to waive the requirement for earthquake insurance, Lessee agrees that it will pay, as additional Rent, which shall be included in the monthly CAC, an amount not to exceed Forty Seven Thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty Three Dollars ($47,833) per year.

  • Legal Action; Utilization of Special Receivership Powers The Assuming Institution shall notify the Receiver in writing (such notice to be given in accordance with Article V below and to include all relevant details) prior to utilizing in any legal action any special legal power or right which the Assuming Institution derives as a result of having acquired an asset from the Receiver, and the Assuming Institution shall not utilize any such power unless the Receiver shall have consented in writing to the proposed usage. The Receiver shall have the right to direct such proposed usage by the Assuming Institution and the Assuming Institution shall comply in all respects with such direction. Upon request of the Receiver, the Assuming Institution will advise the Receiver as to the status of any such legal action. The Assuming Institution shall immediately notify the Receiver of any judgment in litigation involving any of the aforesaid special powers or rights.

  • Arizona The following Arizona provisions are not intended to, and do not, limit the express choice of New York law set forth in Section 9.3 of this Agreement and as set forth in the other Loan Documents, and are set forth herein, if and to the extent that, notwithstanding the choice of law provisions contained in this Agreement and the other Loan Documents, Arizona law is held to govern any Mortgage encumbering a Property located in Arizona or any other Loan Document:

  • XXXREAS the Trust is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the "1940 Act") as an open-end, series management investment company; and

  • Name; State of Organization; Chief Executive Office; Collateral Locations (a) The exact legal name of each Borrower and Guarantor is as set forth on the signature page of this Agreement and in the Information Certificate. No Borrower or Guarantor has, during the five years prior to the date of this Agreement, been known by or used any other corporate or fictitious name or been a party to any merger or consolidation, or acquired all or substantially all of the assets of any Person, or acquired any of its property or assets out of the ordinary course of business, except as set forth in the Information Certificate.

  • Force Maieure Neither party shall be liable hereunder by reason of any failure or delay in the performance of its obligations (except for the payment of money) on account of strikes, shortages, riots, insurrection, fires, flood, storm, explosions, earthquakes, Internet outages, acts of God, acts of war, acts of terrorism, governmental action, or any other cause that is beyond the reasonable control of such party.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.