City Determination of Developer’s Efforts Sample Clauses

City Determination of Developer’s Efforts. Within 14 days after City receives Developer’s documentary evidence of Developer’s commercially reasonable good faith efforts, the City will make a written reasonable determination of Developer’s commercially good faith efforts to generate New Jobs in the Strata AIM Zone upon the conclusion of the applicable Strata AIM Zone Reporting Period (each, a “Strata AIM Zone Effort Determination”), which Strata AIM Zone Effort Determination shall set forth, with particularity, the basis of the City’s determination, in good faith, but if City does not make such Strata AIM Zone Effort Determination within such 14 days after receipt by City of Developer’s documentary evidence, City shall be estopped and prohibited from alleging or pursuing a Strata AIM Zone Revenue Deficiency and/or a reimbursement or payment of any such Strata AIM Zone Revenue Deficiency. If the City reasonably and timely concludes in its Strata AIM Zone Effort Determination that the Strata AIM Zone Revenue Deficiency exists: i. notwithstanding Developer’s commercially reasonable good faith efforts, Developer will have no liability to reimburse the City for the AIM Zone Revenue Deficiency for the applicable Strata AIM Zone Reporting Period.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to City Determination of Developer’s Efforts

  • Independence from Material Breach Determination Except as set forth in Section X.D.1.c, these provisions for payment of Stipulated Penalties shall not affect or otherwise set a standard for OIG’s decision that CHSI has materially breached this CIA, which decision shall be made at OIG’s discretion and shall be governed by the provisions in Section X.D, below.

  • Penalty Determination H&SC section 39619.7 requires CARB to provide information on the basis for the penalties it seeks. This Agreement includes this information, which is also summarized here. The provision of law the penalty is being assessed under and why that provision is most appropriate for that violation. The penalty provision being applied in this case is H&SC section 42402 et seq. because IIT sold, supplied, offered for sale, consumer products for commerce in California in violation of the Consumer Products Regulations (17 CCR section 94507 et seq.). The penalty provisions of H&SC section 42402 et seq. apply to violations of the Consumer Products Regulations because the regulations were adopted under authority of H&SC section 41712, which is in Part 4 of Division 26. The manner in which the penalty amount was determined, including aggravating and mitigating factors and per unit or per vehicle basis for the penalty. H&SC section 42402 et seq. provides strict liability penalties of up to $10,000 per day for violations of the Consumer Product Regulations with each day being a separate violation. In cases like this, involving unintentional violations of the Consumer Products Regulations where the violator cooperates with the investigation, CARB has obtained penalties for selling uncertified charcoal lighter material in California. In this case, the total penalty is $7,500 for selling uncertified charcoal lighter material in California. The penalty in this case was reduced because this was a strict liability first-time violation and IIT made diligent efforts to cooperate with the investigation. To come into compliance, IIT no longer offers Safegel BBQ & Fireplace Lighting Gel Fire Starter for commerce in California. Final penalties were determined based on the unique circumstances of this matter, considered together with the need to remove any economic benefit from noncompliance, the goal of deterring future violations and obtaining swift compliance, the consideration of past penalties in similar negotiated cases, and the potential cost and risk associated with litigating these particular violations. The penalty reflects violations extending over a number of days resulting in quantifiable harm to the environment considered together with the complete circumstances of this case. Penalties in future cases might be smaller or larger on a per ton basis. The final penalty in this case was based in part on confidential financial information or confidential business information provided by IIT that is not retained by CARB in the ordinary course of business. The penalty in this case was also based on confidential settlement communications between CARB and IIT that CARB does not retain in the ordinary course of business. The penalty also reflects CARB’s assessment of the relative strength of its case against IIT, the desire to avoid the uncertainty, burden and expense of litigation, obtain swift compliance with the law and remove any unfair advantage that IIT may have secured from its actions. Is the penalty being assessed under a provision of law that prohibits the emission of pollution at a specified level, and, if so a quantification of excess emissions, if it is practicable to do so. The Consumer Product Regulations do not prohibit emissions above a specified level, but they do limit the concentration of VOCs in regulated products. In this case, a quantification of the excess emissions attributable to the violations was not practicable.

  • Determination by Independent Firm In the event of any question arising with respect to the adjustments provided for in this Article 4 such question shall be conclusively determined by an independent firm of chartered accountants other than the Auditors, who shall have access to all necessary records of the Corporation, and such determination shall be binding upon the Corporation, the Warrant Agent, all holders and all other persons interested therein.

  • Salary Determination 12.5.1 A unit member shall receive a salary not less than the minimum salary nor more than the maximum salary (Articles 12.3 and 12.4) for the rank to which appointed, except as provided in Articles 4.15, 5.6, 10.6.1 or Article 10.6.1.1. The effective dates for salaries shall be the appropriate dates specified in Article 12.2.2.

  • HHS Single Audit Unit will notify Grantee to complete the Single Audit Determination Form If Grantee fails to complete the form within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of notice, Grantee maybe subject to sanctions and remedies for non-compliance.

  • Notification of Delay The Design Professional shall immediately notify the City in writing if Design Professional experiences or anticipates experiencing a delay in performing the Professional Services within the time frames set forth in the Task Order. The written notice shall include an explanation of the cause for, and a reasonable estimate of the length of, the delay. If in the opinion of the City, the delay affects a material part of the Task, the City may exercise its rights under Sections 2.5-2.7 of this Agreement.

  • Withdrawal of Property from Market or Termination of Discussions Potential Investor acknowledges that the Property has been offered for sale subject to withdrawal of the Property from the market at any time or rejection of any offer because of the terms thereof, or for any other reason whatsoever, without notice, as well as the termination of discussions with any party at any time without notice for any reason whatsoever.

  • Eligibility Determination The State or its designee will make eligibility determinations for each of the HHSC HMO Programs.

  • Notification of Deduction The Union shall inform the Employer in writing of the authorized deduction to be checked off for Employees mentioned in Article 11.01.

  • DETERMINATION OF DISPUTES Any dispute arising under this Section 2.6 shall be resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution procedures of Article 7.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.