Common Ownership Under Joint Research Agreements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section 8, neither Party will have the right to make an election under 35 U.S.C. 103(c) when exercising its rights under this Section 8 without the prior written consent of the other Party. With respect to any such permitted election, the Parties will coordinate their activities with respect to any submissions, filings or other activities in support thereof. The Parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement is a “joint research agreement” as defined in 35 U.S.C. 100(h).
Common Ownership Under Joint Research Agreements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Article 5 (INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY), neither Party shall have the right to make an election under 35 U.S.C. 102(c) when exercising its rights under this Article 5 (INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY) without the prior written consent of the other Party. With respect to any such permitted election, the Parties shall coordinate their activities with respect to any submissions, filings or other activities in support thereof. The Parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement is a “joint research agreement” as defined in 35 U.S.C. 100(h).
Common Ownership Under Joint Research Agreements. This Agreement will be understood to be a joint research agreement under 35 U.S.C. § 102(c) entered into for the purposes of researching, identifying and Developing Licensed Compounds and Licensed Products. The Parties will coordinate their activities with respect to any submissions, filings or other activities in support thereof. The Parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement is a “joint research agreement” as defined in 35 U.S.C. § 100(h).
Common Ownership Under Joint Research Agreements. Subject matter disclosed and a claimed invention shall be deemed to have been owned by the same person or subject to an obli- gation of assignment to the same person in ap- plying the provisions of subsection (b)(2)(C) if—
(1) the subject matter disclosed was devel- oped and the claimed invention was made by, or on behalf of, 1 or more parties to a joint re- search agreement that was in effect on or be- fore the effective filing date of the claimed in- vention;
(2) the claimed invention was made as a re- xxxx of activities undertaken within the scope of the joint research agreement; and
(3) the application for patent for the claimed invention discloses or is amended to disclose the names of the parties to the joint research agreement.
Common Ownership Under Joint Research Agreements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Article XIII, Takeda shall have the first right to make an election under 35 U.S.C. § 102(c) when exercising its rights under this Article VIII without the prior written consent of MTEM. If Takeda fails to make such an election within [***] following the date on which the opportunity to make such election arose, then MTEM shall have the right and option to do so at its expense. With respect to any such permitted election, the Parties shall coordinate their activities with respect to any submissions, filings or other activities in support thereof. The Parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement is a “joint research agreement” as defined in 35 U.S.C. § 100(h).
Common Ownership Under Joint Research Agreements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Article 7, neither Party shall have the right to make an election under the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement Act of 2004, 35 U.S.C. 103(c)(2)-(c)(3) (the “CREATE Act”) or 35 U.S.C. 102(c), as applicable, when exercising its rights under this Article 7 without the prior written consent of the other Party. With respect to any such permitted election, the Parties shall coordinate their activities with respect to any submissions, filings, or other activities in support thereof. The Parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement is a “joint research agreement” as defined in the CREATE Act or 35 U.S.C. 100(h), as applicable.
Common Ownership Under Joint Research Agreements. This Agreement will be understood to be a joint research agreement under 35 U.S.C. § 102(c) entered into for the purposes of researching, identifying and Developing Nanobodies and Compounds against Sanofi Targets. The Parties will coordinate their activities with respect to any submissions, filings or other activities in support thereof. The Parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement is a “joint research agreement” as defined in 35 U.S.C. § 100(h).
Common Ownership Under Joint Research Agreements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this ARTICLE 8, each Party shall have the right to invoke 35 U.S.C. 102(c) when exercising its rights under this ARTICLE 8 without the prior written consent of the other Party. A Party intending to invoke 35 U.S.C. 102(c) shall so notify the other Party, and the Parties shall coordinate their activities with respect to any submissions, filings or other activities in support thereof. The Parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement is a “joint research agreement” as defined in 35 U.S.C. 100(h).
Common Ownership Under Joint Research Agreements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, neither Party will have the right to invoke "common ownership" under a Joint Research Agreement pursuant to Applicable Law when exercising its rights under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other Party, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. In the event that a Party is permitted to invoke such common ownership as required by the preceding sentence, the Parties will cooperate and coordinate their activities with respect to any submissions, filings or other activities in support thereof. The Parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement is a "joint research agreement" as defined under Applicable Law.
Common Ownership Under Joint Research Agreements. The Parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement is a “joint research agreement” as defined in 35 U.S.C. §100(h). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this ARTICLE 8, neither Party will have the right to provide to a court or an agency a statement under 37 C.F.R. §1.104(c)(4)(ii)(A) to disqualify, for purposes of 35 U.S.C. §§102(b)(2)(C) and 102(c), prior art under §102(a)(2) by the other Party without the prior written consent of the other Party, which will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. With respect to any such permitted statement, the Parties shall coordinate their activities with respect to any submissions, filings or other activities in support thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the other Party’s consent under this Section 8.7 shall not be required to permit a Party to file with a court or agency a terminal disclaimer under 37 C.F.R. §1.321(d) to overcome any obviousness-type double patenting in any patent application claiming a Development Candidate, Licensed Product or one or more uses thereof, provided that the Party filing such terminal disclaimer shall give reasonable advance notice to the other Party of such filing.