Communication of Evaluation Results. 1. Each Appointment Review Committee, as part of its ongoing evaluation of the candidate, shall meet as a body and prepare report(s) that document the evaluation process of the candidate’s strengths and recommendations for improvement as applicable. The committee will meet with the candidate to discuss the report(s) and furnish the candidate with a copy of the written report(s). 2. Copies of the written report(s) shall be submitted to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs and appropriate vice president, who will forward them to the College President. The College President will submit the written report(s) to the Board of Trustees. 3. At a minimum, the following Appointment Review Committee reports will be submitted to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs or appropriate vice president on or before the dates specified below: a. A written progress report outlining the evaluation process, all evaluation results, areas of strength and those needing improvement, and specific steps that can be taken by the candidate to improve. Submitted by the last day of the first probationary quarter. b. A comprehensive evaluation report that includes documentation of the process, all evaluative material collected during the college year, summary of progress, and recommendation for continued probationary status or tenure. Submitted by the dates indicated below: (1) For candidates whose appointments begin in fall quarter, by February 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by March 1 for evaluation of the third, fourth, and fifth quarters; and by March 1 for evaluation of the first and second quarters. (2) For candidates whose appointments begin in winter quarter, by May 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by May 20 for evaluation of the third, fourth and fifth quarters; and by May 20 for evaluation of the first and second quarters. (3) For candidates whose appointments begin in a spring quarter, by November 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by November 15 for evaluation of the third, fourth and fifth quarters; and by November 15 for evaluation of the first and second quarters. 4. When areas needing improvement in the performance of a candidate are noted by the Appointment Review Committee, the following steps will be taken by the committee: a. Specific areas needing improvement will be outlined in writing and discussed with the candidate within five (5) days of the conclusion of each Appointment Review Committee meeting. b. The Appointment Review Committee will develop with the candidate a written plan of action to improve these deficient areas. c. Follow-up conferences (at least one [1] a month) will be held and written progress reports will be prepared by the Appointment Review Committee to help the candidate improve and document progress. 5. The College President may require reports at any time. Such reports shall be submitted by the Appointment Review Committee within fifteen (15) working days of the written request.
Appears in 5 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
Communication of Evaluation Results. 1. Each Appointment Review Committee, as part of its ongoing evaluation of the candidate, shall meet as a body and prepare report(s) that document the evaluation process of the candidate’s strengths and recommendations for improvement as applicable. The committee will meet with the candidate to discuss the report(s) and furnish the candidate with a copy of the written report(s).
2. Copies of the written report(s) shall be submitted to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs EVP and appropriate vice president, who will forward them to the College President. The College President will submit the written report(s) to the Board of Trustees.
3. At a minimum, the following Appointment Review Committee reports will be submitted to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs EVP or appropriate vice president on or before the dates specified below:
a. A written progress report outlining the evaluation process, all evaluation results, areas of strength and those needing improvement, and specific steps that can be taken by the candidate to improve. Submitted by the last day of the first probationary quarter.
b. A comprehensive evaluation report that includes documentation of the process, all evaluative material collected during the college year, summary of progress, and recommendation for continued probationary status or tenure. Submitted by the dates indicated below:.
(1) For candidates whose appointments begin in fall quarter, by February 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh seventh, and eighth quarters; by March 1 February 15 for evaluation of the third, fourth, and fifth quarters; and by March 1 for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
(2) For candidates whose appointments begin in winter quarter, by May 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh seventh, and eighth quarters; by May 20 15 for evaluation of the third, fourth fourth, and fifth quarters; and by May 20 for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
(3) For candidates whose appointments begin in a spring quarter, by November 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by November 15 for evaluation of the third, fourth fourth, and fifth quarters; and by November 15 for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
4. When the areas needing improvement in identified for required areas for growth have been discussed, and there still is concern regarding the performance ability of a candidate are noted by the Appointment Review Committee, the following steps will be taken by the committee:
a. Specific areas needing improvement will be outlined in writing and discussed with ARC to recommend the candidate within five (5) days for tenure, then a written Improvement Plan for the support and professional development of the conclusion of each Appointment Review Committee meeting.
b. The Appointment Review Committee will develop with the candidate a written plan of action to improve these deficient areas.
c. faculty member shall be created as defined in Appendix B (Definitions). Follow-up conferences (at least one [(1] a ) per month) will be held and written progress reports will be prepared by the Appointment Review Committee to help the candidate improve and document progress.
5. The College President may require reports at any time. Such reports shall be submitted by the Appointment Review Committee within fifteen (15) working days of the written request.
Appears in 4 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
Communication of Evaluation Results.
1. Each Appointment Review Committee, as part of its ongoing evaluation of the candidate, shall meet as a body and prepare report(s) that document the evaluation process of the candidate’s strengths and recommendations for improvement as applicable. The committee will meet with the candidate to discuss the report(s) and furnish the candidate with a copy of the written report(s).
2. Copies of the written report(s) shall be submitted to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs VP and appropriate vice president, who will forward them to the College President. The College President will submit the written report(s) to the Board of Trustees.
3. At a minimum, the following Appointment Review Committee reports will be submitted to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs or appropriate vice president VP on or before the dates specified below:
a. A written progress report outlining the evaluation process, all evaluation results, areas of strength and those needing improvement, and specific steps that can be taken by the candidate to improve. Submitted by the last day of the first probationary quarter.
b. A comprehensive evaluation report that includes documentation of the process, all evaluative material collected during the college year, summary of progress, and recommendation for continued probationary status or tenure. Submitted by the dates indicated below:.
(1) For candidates whose appointments begin in fall quarter, by February 15 the last day of week 6 winter quarter for evaluation of the sixth, seventh seventh, and eighth quarters; by March 1 the last day of week 6 winter quarter for evaluation of the third, fourth, and fifth quarters; and by March 1 the last day of week 8 winter quarter for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
(2) For candidates whose appointments begin in winter quarter, by May 15 the last day of week 7 spring quarter for evaluation of the sixth, seventh seventh, and eighth quarters; by May 20 the last day of week 7 spring quarter for evaluation of the third, fourth fourth, and fifth quarters; and by May 20 the last day of week 7 spring quarter for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
(3) For candidates whose appointments begin in a spring quarter, by November 15 the last day of week 8 fall quarter for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by November 15 the last day of week 8 fall quarter for evaluation of the third, fourth fourth, and fifth quarters; and by November 15 the last day of week 8 fall quarter for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
4. When the areas needing improvement in identified for required areas for growth have been discussed, and there still is concern regarding the performance ability of a candidate are noted by the Appointment Review Committee, the following steps will be taken by the committee:
a. Specific areas needing improvement will be outlined in writing and discussed with ARC to recommend the candidate within five (5) days for tenure, then a written Improvement Plan for the support and professional development of the conclusion of each Appointment Review Committee meeting.
b. The Appointment Review Committee will develop with the candidate a written plan of action to improve these deficient areas.
c. faculty member shall be created as defined below and in Appendix C (Definitions). Follow-up conferences (at least one [(1] a ) per month) will be held and written progress reports will be prepared by the Appointment Review Committee to help the candidate improve and document progress. An Improvement Plan is a document written for the purpose of support and professional development of the faculty in specifically identified areas needing improvement. Plans must include the following elements:
a. Description of area or areas needing improvement.
b. Outcomes that are reasonable, objective, measurable and mutually understood.
c. A mutually agreed upon time to demonstrate and evaluate improvement in areas identified.
d. Signature of all parties involved confirming their receipt and understanding of the improvement plan.
5. The College President may require reports at any time. Such reports shall be submitted by the Appointment Review Committee within fifteen (15) working days of the written request.
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: Employment Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
Communication of Evaluation Results. 1. Each Appointment Review Committee, as part of its ongoing evaluation of the candidate, shall meet as a body and prepare report(s) that document the evaluation process of the candidate’s strengths and recommendations for improvement as applicable. The committee will meet with the candidate to discuss the report(s) and furnish the candidate with a copy of the written report(s).
2. Copies of the written report(s) shall be submitted to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs and appropriate vice president, who will forward them to the College President. The College President will submit the written report(s) to the Board of Trustees.
3. At a minimum, the following Appointment Review Committee reports will be submitted to the Vice President for Academic Affairs and Student Affairs or appropriate vice president on or before the dates specified below:
a. A written progress report outlining the evaluation process, all evaluation results, areas of strength and those needing improvement, and specific steps that can be taken by the candidate to improve. Submitted by the last day of the first probationary quarter.
b. A comprehensive evaluation report that includes documentation of the process, all evaluative material collected during the college year, summary of progress, and recommendation for continued probationary status or tenure. Submitted by the dates indicated below:
(1) For candidates whose appointments begin in fall quarter, by February 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by March 1 for evaluation of the third, fourth, and fifth quarters; and by March 1 for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
(2) For candidates whose appointments begin in winter quarter, by May 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by May 20 for evaluation of the third, fourth and fifth quarters; and by May 20 for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
(3) For candidates whose appointments begin in a spring quarter, by November 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by November 15 for evaluation of the third, fourth and fifth quarters; and by November 15 for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
4. When areas needing improvement in the performance of a candidate are noted by the Appointment Review Committee, the following steps will be taken by the committee:
a. Specific areas needing improvement will be outlined in writing and discussed with the candidate within five (5) days of the conclusion of each Appointment Review Committee meeting.
b. The Appointment Review Committee will develop with the candidate a written plan of action to improve these deficient areas.
c. Follow-up conferences (at least one [1] a month) will be held and written progress reports will be prepared by the Appointment Review Committee to help the candidate improve and document progress.
5. The College President may require reports at any time. Such reports shall be submitted by the Appointment Review Committee within fifteen (15) working days of the written request.
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
Communication of Evaluation Results. 1. Each Appointment Review Committee, as part of its ongoing evaluation of the candidate, shall meet as a body and prepare report(s) that document the evaluation process of the candidate’s strengths and recommendations for improvement as applicable. The committee will meet with the candidate to discuss the report(s) and furnish the candidate with a copy of the written report(swrittenreport(s).
2. Copies of the written report(s) shall be submitted to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs EVP and appropriate vice president, who will forward them to the College President. The College President will submit the written report(s) to the Board of Trustees.
3. At a minimum, the following Appointment Review Committee reports will be submitted to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs EVP or appropriate vice president on or before the dates specified below:
a. A written progress report outlining the evaluation process, all evaluation results, areas of strength and those needing improvement, and specific steps that can be taken by the candidate to improve. Submitted by the last day of the first probationary quarter.
b. A comprehensive evaluation report that includes documentation of the process, all evaluative material collected during the college year, summary of progress, and recommendation for continued probationary status or tenure. Submitted by the dates indicated below:.
(1) For candidates whose appointments begin in fall quarter, by February 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh seventh, and eighth quarters; by March 1 February 15 for evaluation of the third, fourth, and fifth quarters; and by March 1 for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
(2) For candidates whose appointments begin in winter quarter, by May 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh seventh, and eighth quarters; by May 20 15 for evaluation of the third, fourth fourth, and fifth quarters; and by May 20 for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
(3) For candidates whose appointments begin in a spring quarter, by November 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by November 15 for evaluation of the third, fourth fourth, and fifth quarters; and by November 15 for evaluation of the first and second quarterssecondquarters.
4. When the areas needing improvement in identified for required areas for growth have been discussed, and there still is concern regarding the performance ability of a candidate are noted by the Appointment Review Committee, the following steps will be taken by the committee:
a. Specific areas needing improvement will be outlined in writing and discussed with ARC to recommend the candidate within five (5) days for tenure, then a written Improvement Plan for the support and professional development of the conclusion of each Appointment Review Committee meeting.
b. The Appointment Review Committee will develop with the candidate a written plan of action to improve these deficient areas.
c. faculty member shall be created as defined in Appendix B (Definitions). Follow-up conferences (at least one [(1] a ) per month) will be held and written progress reports will be prepared by the Appointment Review Committee to help the candidate improve and document progress.
5. The College President may require reports at any time. Such reports shall be submitted by the Appointment Review Committee within fifteen (15) working days of the written requestwrittenrequest.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
Communication of Evaluation Results. 1. Each Appointment Review Committee, as part of its ongoing evaluation of the candidate, shall meet as a body and prepare report(s) that document the evaluation process of the candidate’s strengths and recommendations for improvement as applicable. The committee will meet with the candidate to discuss the report(s) and furnish the candidate with a copy of the written report(s).
2. Copies of the written report(s) shall be submitted to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs VP and appropriate vice president, who will forward them to the College President. The College President will submit the written report(s) to the Board of Trustees.
3. At a minimum, the following Appointment Review Committee reports will be submitted to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs or appropriate vice president VP on or before the dates specified below:. (Once a candidate is awarded tenure, no further ARC reports are required.):
a. A written progress report outlining the evaluation process, all evaluation results, areas of strength and those needing improvement, and specific steps that can be taken by the candidate to improve. Submitted by the last day of the first probationary quarter.
b. A comprehensive evaluation report that includes documentation of the process, all evaluative material collected during the college year, summary of progress, and recommendation for continued probationary status or tenure. Submitted by the dates indicated below:.
(1) For candidates whose appointments begin in fall quarter, by February 15 the last day of week 6 winter quarter for evaluation of the sixth, seventh seventh, and eighth quarters; by March 1 the last day of week 6 winter quarter for evaluation of the third, fourth, and fifth quarters; and by March 1 the last day of week 8 winter quarter for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
(2) For candidates whose appointments begin in winter quarter, by May 15 the last day of week 7 spring quarter for evaluation of the sixth, seventh seventh, and eighth quarters; by May 20 the last day of week 7 spring quarter for evaluation of the third, fourth fourth, and fifth quarters; and by May 20 the last day of week 7 spring quarter for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
(3) For candidates whose appointments begin in a spring quarter, by November 15 the last day of week 8 fall quarter for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by November 15 the last day of week 8 fall quarter for evaluation of the third, fourth fourth, and fifth quarters; and by November 15 the last day of week 8 fall quarter for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
4. When the areas needing improvement in identified for required areas for growth have been discussed, and there still is concern regarding the performance ability of a candidate are noted by the Appointment Review Committee, the following steps will be taken by the committee:
a. Specific areas needing improvement will be outlined in writing and discussed with ARC to recommend the candidate within five (5) days for tenure, then a written Improvement Plan for the support and professional development of the conclusion of each Appointment Review Committee meeting.
b. The Appointment Review Committee will develop with the candidate a written plan of action to improve these deficient areas.
c. faculty member shall be created as defined below and in Appendix C (Definitions). Follow-up conferences (at least one [(1] a ) per month) will be held and written progress reports will be prepared by the Appointment Review Committee to help the candidate improve and document progress. An Improvement Plan is a document written for the purpose of support and professional development of the faculty in specifically identified areas needing improvement. Plans must include the following elements:
a. Description of area or areas needing improvement.
b. Outcomes that are reasonable, objective, measurable and mutually understood.
c. A mutually agreed upon time to demonstrate and evaluate improvement in areas identified.
d. Signature of all parties involved confirming their receipt and understanding of the improvement plan.
5. The College President may require reports at any time. Such reports shall be submitted by the Appointment Review Committee within fifteen (15) working days of the written request.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
Communication of Evaluation Results.
1. Each Appointment Review Committee, as part of its ongoing evaluation of the candidate, shall meet as a body and prepare report(s) that document the evaluation process of the candidate’s strengths and recommendations for improvement as applicable. The committee will meet with the candidate to discuss the report(s) and furnish the candidate with a copy of the written report(s).
2. Copies of the written report(s) shall be submitted to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs VP and appropriate vice president, who will forward them to the College President. The College President will submit the written report(s) to the Board of Trustees.
3. At a minimum, the following Appointment Review Committee reports will be submitted to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs or appropriate vice president VP on or before the dates specified below:
a. A written progress report outlining the evaluation process, all evaluation results, areas of strength and those needing improvement, and specific steps that can be taken by the candidate to improve. Submitted by the last day of the first probationary quarter.
b. A comprehensive evaluation report that includes documentation of the process, all evaluative material collected during the college year, summary of progress, and recommendation for continued probationary status or tenure. Submitted by the dates indicated below:.
(1) For candidates whose appointments begin in fall quarter, by February 15 the last day of week 6 winter quarter for evaluation of the sixth, seventh seventh, and eighth quarters; by March 1 the last day of week 6 winter quarter for evaluation of the third, fourth, and fifth quarters; and by March 1 the last day of week 8 winter quarter for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
(2) For candidates whose appointments begin in winter quarter, by May 15 the last day of week 7 spring quarter for evaluation of the sixth, seventh seventh, and eighth quarters; by May 20 the last day of week 7 spring quarter for evaluation of the third, fourth fourth, and fifth quarters; and by May 20 the last day of week 7 spring quarter for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
(3) For candidates whose appointments begin in a spring quarter, by November 15 the last day of week 8 fall quarter for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by November 15 the last day of week 8 fall quarter for evaluation of the third, fourth fourth, and fifth quarters; and by November 15 the last day of week 8 fall quarter for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
4. When the areas needing improvement in identified for required areas for growth have been discussed, and there still is concern regarding the performance ability of a candidate are noted by the Appointment Review Committee, the following steps will be taken by the committee:
a. Specific areas needing improvement will be outlined in writing and discussed with ARC to recommend the candidate within five (5) days for tenure, then a written Improvement Plan for the support and professional development of the conclusion of each Appointment Review Committee meeting.
b. The Appointment Review Committee will develop with the candidate a written plan of action to improve these deficient areas.
c. faculty member shall be created as defined below and in Appendix B (Definitions). Follow-up conferences (at least one [(1] a ) per month) will be held and written progress reports will be prepared by the Appointment Review Committee to help the candidate improve and document progress. An Improvement Plan is a document written for the purpose of support and professional development of the faculty in specifically identified areas needing improvement. Plans must include the following elements:
a. Description of area or areas needing improvement.
b. Outcomes that are reasonable, objective, measurable and mutually understood.
c. A mutually agreed upon time to demonstrate and evaluate improvement in areas identified.
d. Signature of all parties involved confirming their receipt and understanding of the improvement plan.
5. The College President may require reports at any time. Such reports shall be submitted by the Appointment Review Committee within fifteen (15) working days of the written request.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
Communication of Evaluation Results. 1. Each Appointment Review Committee, as part of its ongoing evaluation of the candidate, shall meet as a body and prepare report(s) that document the evaluation process of the candidate’s strengths and recommendations for improvement as applicable. The committee will meet with the candidate to discuss the report(s) and furnish the candidate with a copy of the written report(s).
2. Copies of the written report(s) shall be submitted to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs and appropriate vice president, who will forward them to the College President. The College President will submit the written report(s) to the Board of Trustees.
3. At a minimum, the following Appointment Review Committee reports will be submitted to the Vice President for Academic Affairs and Student Affairs or appropriate vice president on or before the dates specified below:
a. A a written progress report outlining the evaluation process, all evaluation results, areas of strength and those needing improvement, and specific steps that can be taken by the candidate to improve. Submitted by the last day of the first probationary quarter.
b. A a comprehensive evaluation report that includes documentation of the process, all evaluative material collected during the college year, summary of progress, and recommendation for continued probationary status or tenure. Submitted by the dates indicated below:
(1) For for candidates whose appointments begin in fall quarter, by February 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by March 1 for evaluation of the third, fourth, and fifth quarters; and by March 1 for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
(2) For for candidates whose appointments begin in winter quarter, by May 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by May 20 for evaluation of the third, fourth and fifth quarters; and by May 20 for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
(3) For for candidates whose appointments begin in a spring quarter, by November 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by November 15 for evaluation of the third, fourth and fifth quarters; and by November 15 for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
4. When areas needing improvement in the performance of a candidate are noted by the Appointment Review Committee, the following steps will be taken by the committee:
a. Specific specific areas needing improvement will be outlined in writing and discussed with the candidate within five (5) days of the conclusion of each Appointment Review Committee meeting.
b. The the Appointment Review Committee will develop with the candidate a written plan of action to improve these deficient areas.
c. Followfollow-up conferences (at least one [1] a month) will be held and written progress reports will be prepared by the Appointment Review Committee to help the candidate improve and document progress.
5. The College President may require reports at any time. Such reports shall be submitted by the Appointment Review Committee within fifteen (15) working days of the written request.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
Communication of Evaluation Results. 1.
10.11.01 Each Appointment Tenure Review Committee, as part of its ongoing evaluation of the candidate, shall meet as a body and prepare report(s) that document the an annual TRC Evaluation Report. This report shall be a comprehensive evaluation process of the candidate’s strengths candidate based on the criteria identified in Article 10.06. It shall provide commendations and recommendations suggestions for improvement as applicableapplicable and shall clearly state the TRC’s recommendation on the continued progress of the candidate through the tenure process. The committee will meet with the candidate to discuss the report(s) and furnish the candidate with a copy of the written report(s).
2. Copies of , prior to submitting the written report(s) shall be submitted to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs and appropriate vice president, who will forward them to the College President. The College President will submit the written report(s) to anyone other than the Board of Trusteescandidate.
3. At 10.11.01.01 If the committee’s recommendation is not unanimous, a minimumminority report will be generated and also become part of the record.
10.11.01.02 The committee’s report(s) will be signed by each member and include any minority recommendation.
10.11.02 For First- and Second-year candidates, the following Appointment Tenure Review Committee reports will Evaluation Report shall be submitted to issued in accordance with the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs or appropriate vice president on or before the dates specified belowfollowing schedule:
a. A written progress report outlining the evaluation process, all evaluation results, areas of strength and those needing improvement, and specific steps that can be taken by the candidate to improve. Submitted by the last day of the first probationary quarter.
b. A comprehensive evaluation report that includes documentation of the process, all evaluative material collected during the college year, summary of progress, and recommendation for continued probationary status or tenure. Submitted by the dates indicated below:
(1) 10.11.02.01 For candidates whose appointments begin in fall quarter, by February 15 the first Monday after May 1 (in their first year) for evaluation of the sixth, seventh first and eighth second quarters; by March the first Monday after May 1 (in their second year) for evaluation of the third, fourth, and fifth quarters For candidates whose appointments begin in winter quarter, by the first Monday after October 1 (in the subsequent year) for evaluation of the first and second quarters; by the first Monday after October 1 (in the subsequent year) for evaluation of the third, fourth, and fifth quarters; .
10.11.03 For first- and by March 1 for evaluation second-year candidates copies of these TRC Evaluation Reports shall be submitted to the Senior Academic Officer. The Senior Academic Officer shall write a response to the TRC Evaluation Report within fifteen (15) working days indicating agreement with it and/or noting any commendations, questions or recommendations. This response will be part of the first and second quartersTenure Portfolio. Should this response require the addressing of performance-related concerns, the process described in Article 10.08 will be followed.
(2) 10.11.04 For Third Year candidates, the Tenure Review Committee Evaluation Report shall be issued in accordance with the followingschedule:
10.11.04.01 For candidates whose appointments begin in fall quarter, by the first Monday after February 15; For candidates whose appointments begin in winter quarter, by the first Monday after May 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by May 20 for evaluation 15.
10.11.05 Copies of the third, fourth and fifth quarters; and by May 20 for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
(3) For candidates whose appointments begin in a spring quarter, by November 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by November 15 for evaluation of the third, fourth and fifth quarters; and by November 15 for evaluation of the first and second quarters.
4. When areas needing improvement in the performance of a candidate are noted by the Appointment Review Committee, the following steps will be taken by the committee:
a. Specific areas needing improvement will be outlined in writing and discussed -year Evaluation Report along with the candidate within five (5) days of the conclusion of each Appointment Review Committee meeting.
b. The Appointment Review Committee will develop with the candidate a written plan of action to improve these deficient areas.
c. Follow-up conferences (at least one [1] a month) will be held and written progress reports will be prepared by the Appointment Review Committee to help the candidate improve and document progress.
5. The College President may require reports at any time. Such reports candidate’s Tenure Portfolio shall be submitted by to the Appointment Review Committee Senior Academic Officer. The Senior Academic Officer shall write a response within fifteen (15) working days to the Evaluation Report indicating agreement with it and/or noting any commendations, questions or recommendations. This response will be part of the written requestTenure Portfolio.
10.11.06 Copies of the third-year Comprehensive Report along with the candidate’s Tenure Portfolio shall then be submitted to the College President. The College President shall write a response within ten (10) working days to the Comprehensive Report indicating agreement with it and/or noting any commendations, questions or recommendations. This response will be part of the Tenure Portfolio.
10.11.07 If the President makes a recommendation that is contrary to the recommendation of the Tenure Review Committee, they shall discuss such differences with the Tenure Review Committee prior to submitting their recommendation to the Board.
10.11.08 At this point, the Tenure Portfolio is delivered to the Board of Trustees for review.
10.11.08.01 The following chart summarizes important dates in the Tenure Process for candidates whose appointments begin in Fall Quarter: Tenure cohort formed No later than Oct. 1, first year CCCFT 10.04.01 TRC formed No later than Oct. 10, first year CCCFT and College 10.04.01 Tenure Process Compliance Report Ongoing, updated by the last day of each quarter TRC Chair 10.05.04
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
