Conclusion on 3rd Section Sample Clauses

Conclusion on 3rd Section. Within Danish and Norwegian law, an absolute requirement in order for the shipmanager not to be bound is that he actually acts in the name of the shipowner. It is important that the shipmanager at the conclusion of the contract with a third party, clearly states that he merely acts as the shipowner’s representative and does not want to enter into a legal relationship with the third party. If the shipmanager has made it clear to the third party that he acts as an agent and who the principal is, he will not be bound by the transactions and therefore he will not be considered as the contracting party. After a review of the rulings, it seems that a party may be bound as a contracting party or obligated in accordance with the contractual rules even if the shipmanager according to a traditional perception has not made any promises and just acting as an agent. The rulings states that a shipmanager will become liable if he not in a sufficiently clear way emphasize the role of the parties and that he merely acts as an agent for another party which is obligated instead. The rules of contract law lays down obligations to the manager that he must act with loyal behaviour, fair conduct and reasonable preparation of the relationship between the parties. In English law when the shipmanager contracts expressly as agent for a named or identifiable shipowner, third parties contract with the shipowner, not the shipmanager. If a xxxxxxxxxxx signs a contract in his own name, he will become liable unless it is clear from the document that he is signing in his capacity as agent. Like it is stated in the rulings, it is not suffice to ad “agent” or “manager” to the contract, but it must be clear that he is acting in a representative capacity. Where the shipmanager clearly states that he is acting on behalf of the principal but without identifying the principal, he will normally still not be liable. The fact that a shipmanager is “known” to be a manager is insufficient to create a proper agency relationship with third parties. The difference between Danish and Norwegian law and English law is not big. Both law systems states that a shipmanager must make it clear that he is acting as an agent, but in English the name or identity of the principal does not have to be written in the contract with third party, compared with Danish and Norwegian law where the shipmanager has to tell who the principal is. Within commission under Danish and Norwegian law the shipmanager still acts on behal...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Conclusion on 3rd Section

  • Modification to Article V, Section 4 of the DPA Article V, Section 4 of the DPA (Data Breach.) is amended with the following additions: (6) For purposes of defining an unauthorized disclosure or security breach, this definition specifically includes meanings assigned by Texas law, including applicable provisions in the Texas Education Code and Texas Business and Commerce Code.

  • Article and Section Headings The article and section headings herein are for convenience of reference only, and shall not limit or otherwise affect the meaning hereof.

  • Modification to Article IV, Section 7 of the DPA Article IV, Section 7 of the DPA (Advertising Limitations) is amended by deleting the stricken text as follows: Provider is prohibited from using, disclosing, or selling Student Data to (a) inform, influence, or enable Targeted Advertising; or (b) develop a profile of a student, family member/guardian or group, for any purpose other than providing the Service to LEA. This section does not prohibit Provider from using Student Data (i) for adaptive learning or customized student learning (including generating personalized learning recommendations); or (ii) to make product recommendations to teachers or LEA employees; or (iii) to notify account holders about new education product updates, features, or services or from otherwise using Student Data as permitted in this DPA and its accompanying exhibits. [SIGNATURES BELOW]

  • RELATED SECTIONS Not Used

  • Effect of Headings and Table of Contents The Article and Section headings herein and the Table of Contents are for convenience only and shall not affect the construction hereof.

  • Title of Parts and Sections Any titles of the sections or subsections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and are to be disregarded in interpreting any part of the Agreement's provisions.

  • Table of Contents and Headings The Table of Contents and the various headings in this Agreement are included for convenience only and will not affect the meaning or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement.

  • Headings and Table of Contents The inclusion of headings and a table of contents in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and will not affect the construction or interpretation hereof.

  • With reference to Article 5 It is understood that the term “permanent establishment” also includes the furnishing of services by an enterprise of a Contracting State through employees or other personnel engaged by the enterprise for such purpose, but only where the activities of such employees or personnel are performed in the territory of the other Contracting State for a period or periods aggregating more than 183 days within any twelve-month period.

  • Sections and Headings The division of this Agreement into Sections and the insertion of headings are for reference purposes only and shall not affect the interpretation of this Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.