Conclusion on 3rd Section Sample Clauses

Conclusion on 3rd Section. Within Danish and Norwegian law, an absolute requirement in order for the shipmanager not to be bound is that he actually acts in the name of the shipowner. It is important that the shipmanager at the conclusion of the contract with a third party, clearly states that he merely acts as the shipowner’s representative and does not want to enter into a legal relationship with the third party. If the shipmanager has made it clear to the third party that he acts as an agent and who the principal is, he will not be bound by the transactions and therefore he will not be considered as the contracting party. After a review of the rulings, it seems that a party may be bound as a contracting party or obligated in accordance with the contractual rules even if the shipmanager according to a traditional perception has not made any promises and just acting as an agent. The rulings states that a shipmanager will become liable if he not in a sufficiently clear way emphasize the role of the parties and that he merely acts as an agent for another party which is obligated instead. The rules of contract law lays down obligations to the manager that he must act with loyal behaviour, fair conduct and reasonable preparation of the relationship between the parties. In English law when the shipmanager contracts expressly as agent for a named or identifiable shipowner, third parties contract with the shipowner, not the shipmanager. If a xxxxxxxxxxx signs a contract in his own name, he will become liable unless it is clear from the document that he is signing in his capacity as agent. Like it is stated in the rulings, it is not suffice to ad “agent” or “manager” to the contract, but it must be clear that he is acting in a representative capacity. Where the shipmanager clearly states that he is acting on behalf of the principal but without identifying the principal, he will normally still not be liable. The fact that a shipmanager is “known” to be a manager is insufficient to create a proper agency relationship with third parties. The difference between Danish and Norwegian law and English law is not big. Both law systems states that a shipmanager must make it clear that he is acting as an agent, but in English the name or identity of the principal does not have to be written in the contract with third party, compared with Danish and Norwegian law where the shipmanager has to tell who the principal is. Within commission under Danish and Norwegian law the shipmanager still acts on behal...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Conclusion on 3rd Section

  • and Section 7 4. If, by reason of any exercise of Warrants on a “cashless basis”, the holder of any Warrant would be entitled, upon the exercise of such Warrant, to receive a fractional interest in a share of Common Stock, the Company shall round down to the nearest whole number, the number of shares of Common Stock to be issued to such holder.

  • and Section 3 11. Subject to the foregoing, the Manager may cause the Company to issue additional Common Units authorized under this Agreement at such times and upon such terms as the Manager shall determine and the Manager shall amend this Agreement as necessary in connection with the issuance of additional Common Units and admission of additional Members under this Section 3.04 without the requirement of any consent or acknowledgement of any other Member.

  • and Section 2 8. The determination by the applicable Lender of the amount of any such loss, cost or expense shall be conclusive absent manifest error.

  • Captions; Articles and Sections The captions contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and are not part of this Agreement. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to particular Articles or Sections shall mean and refer to the referenced Articles and Sections of this Agreement.

  • Modification to Article V, Section 4 of the DPA Article V, Section 4 of the DPA (Data Breach.) is amended with the following additions: (6) For purposes of defining an unauthorized disclosure or security breach, this definition specifically includes meanings assigned by Texas law, including applicable provisions in the Texas Education Code and Texas Business and Commerce Code.

  • Headings and Sections The headings in this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and are in no way intended to describe, interpret, define, or limit the scope, extent or intent of this Agreement or any provision hereof. Unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this Agreement to Sections or Articles shall be deemed to mean and refer to Sections or Articles of this Agreement.

  • Modification to Article VII, Section 4 of the DPA Article VI, Section 4 of the DPA (Annual Notification of Rights.) is amended as follows:

  • Article and Section Headings The article and section headings herein are for convenience of reference only, and shall not limit or otherwise affect the meaning hereof.

  • Modification to Article III, Section 2 of the DPA Article III, Section 2 of the DPA (Annual Notification of Rights.) is amended as follows:

  • Articles and Sections This Agreement, for convenience only, has been divided into Articles and Sections; and it is understood that the rights and other legal relations of the parties hereto shall be determined from this instrument as an entirety and without regard to the aforesaid division into Articles and Sections and without regard to headings prefixed to such Articles or Sections.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!