Common use of Culpability Score Clause in Contracts

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 6, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(i) The organization had 200 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 68, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(3) The relevant unit of the organization had 200 or more employees and an individual one or more individuals within high-level personnel of the organization unit participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 67, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(2) The the organization had 200 1,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3+4

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 67, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(2) The organization had 200 1,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3+4

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 68, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(1) The organization Organization had 200 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3+5

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement (LVB Acquisition, Inc.), Deferred Prosecution Agreement (Biomet Inc)

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 68, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(1) The organization had 200 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, condoned or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3+5 (g)(2) Cooperation and Acceptance -2

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Plea Agreement, Plea Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 67, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(2) The organization had 200 1,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization +3 participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3offense

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 610, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(1) The organization had 200 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant tolerance of the offense +3by substantial authority personnel was pervasive throughout the organization +5

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 65, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(4) The organization relevant unit had 200 50 or more employees and an individual within high-level substantial authority personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3+2

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 69, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(1) The the unit of the organization within which the offense was committed had 200 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization unit participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3+5

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Plea Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 67, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(2) The organization had 200 1,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3+4

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 6, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(3) The the organization had 200 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 612, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 5 (b)(3)(A)(i1) The organization had 200 which the offense was committed had 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization unit participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3+5

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Plea Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 65, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(4) The organization had 200 50 or more employees More Employees and an individual within highHigh-level personnel of the organization participated inLevel Personnel +2 (g)(2) Cooperation, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3Acceptance -2 Base Fine $384,164,176 Multipliers 1 (min) / 2 (max) Fine Range $384,164,176 (min) / $768,328,352 (max)

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Plea Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 68, calculated summarized as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(1)(A) Involvement in or Tolerance of Criminal Activity The organization had 200 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization unit participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3offense; +5

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement (Transocean Ltd.)

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. Guidelines § 8C2.5, the culpability score Culpability Score is 68, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib) The organization ComEd had 200 or more employees than 5000 employees, and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of in and condoned the offense +3+5

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement (COMMONWEALTH EDISON Co)

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 68, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(1) The the organization had 200 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3+5 (g)(2) Cooperation, Acceptance -2 TOTAL 8 Calculation of Fine Range: Base Fine $150,000,000 Multipliers 1.6 (min)/ 3.2 (max) Fine Range $240,000,000 / $480,000,000

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement (RTX Corp)

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 67, calculated as follows: : score is (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(5) The organization had 200 1,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in+4 (g)(2) Cooperation and Acceptance -2 TOTAL 7 Base Fine (U.S.S.G. §§ 8C2.4(a), condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3(e)) $208,000,000 Multipliers (U.S.S.G. § 8C2.6) 1.4 (min)/2.8 (max)

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Plea Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 64, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(5) The the unit of the organization within which the offense was committed had 200 10 or more employees and an individual within high-level with substantial authority personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3+1

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Plea Agreement (Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.)

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 67, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib) The (2) the organization had 200 1,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3+4

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement (Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc.)

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 65, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(4) The the organization had 200 50 or more employees and an individual within high-level substantial authority personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3+2 (1) The organization fully cooperated in the investigation and clearly demonstrated recognition and affirmative acceptance of responsibility for its criminal conduct -2 TOTAL 5 Calculation of Fine Range: Base Fine $446,000,000 Multipliers 1.0 (min)/2.0 (max) Fine Range $446,000,000 / $892,000,000

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Plea Agreement (Alcoa Inc)

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 68, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(1) The the organization had 200 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3+5 (g)(2) Cooperation, Acceptance -2

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 68, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(1) The the organization had 200 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3+5 (g)(2) Cooperation, Acceptance -2 TOTAL 8

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 67, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(2) The organization Organization had 200 1,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant tolerance of the offense +3by substantial authority personnel was pervasive throughout the organization +4

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Guilty Plea Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 68, calculated as follows: EXAMPLE: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(l) The the unit of the organization had 200 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3+5

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 65, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(5) The organization had 200 10 or more employees +1 and an individual within high-level substantial authority personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3offense

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 6, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(i§ 8C2.5(b)(3)(B)(i) The organization Unit had 200 or more employees +3 and an individual within highHigh-level personnel of the organization participated inLevel Personnel § 8C2.5(g)(2) Cooperation, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3Acceptance - 2 Base Fine $50,000,000 Multipliers 1.2 (min) / 2.4 (max) Fine Range $60,000,000 / $120,000,000

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 6, calculated as follows:5, (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(4) The organization had 200 50 or more employees and an individual within high-level substantial authority personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3+2

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement

Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 610, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(3)(A)(ib)(3) The the organization had 200 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +3offense

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Deferred Prosecution Agreement (Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.)

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!