Common use of Disputes Over Charging Methodologies Clause in Contracts

Disputes Over Charging Methodologies. The parties acknowledge that the Pole Attachment Act grants the FCC regulatory authority over the rates, terms, and conditions of access to poles, ducts, conduits, and rights-of-way. The parties further acknowledge that, as of the date of this Agreement, this State has not elected to assume reverse preemptive regulatory authority over such rates, terms, and conditions by certifying to the FCC that it has made such election. Accordingly, complaints concerning and challenges to SWBT’s charging methodologies shall be brought, in the first instance, before the FCC in accordance with FCC procedural rules unless this State elects to preempt FCC regulation of pole attachment rates, terms, and conditions of access; provided, however, that nothing contained in this section shall be construed as affecting the right of either party to seek relief from any court or agency of competent jurisdiction in connection with the negotiation, arbitration, and approval of interconnection agreements under 47 U.S.C. § 252.

Disputes Over Charging Methodologies. The parties Parties acknowledge that the Pole Attachment Act grants the FCC regulatory authority over the rates, terms, and conditions of access to poles, ducts, conduits, and rights-of-way. The parties Parties further acknowledge that, as of the date of this Agreement, this State has not elected to assume reverse preemptive regulatory authority over such rates, terms, and conditions by certifying to the FCC that it has made such election. Accordingly, complaints concerning and challenges to SWBTNEVADA’s charging methodologies shall be brought, in the first instance, before the FCC in accordance with FCC procedural rules unless this State elects to preempt FCC regulation of pole attachment rates, terms, and conditions of access; provided, however, that nothing contained in this section shall be construed as affecting the right of either party Party to seek relief from any court or agency of competent jurisdiction in connection with the negotiation, arbitration, and approval of interconnection agreements under 47 U.S.C. § 252.

Disputes Over Charging Methodologies. The parties acknowledge that the Pole Attachment Act grants the FCC regulatory authority over the rates, terms, and conditions of access to poles, ducts, conduits, and rights-of-way. The parties further acknowledge that, as of the date of this Agreement, this State has not elected to assume reverse preemptive regulatory authority over such rates, terms, and conditions by certifying to the FCC that it has made such election. Accordingly, complaints concerning and challenges to SWBT’s 's charging methodologies shall be brought, in the first instance, before the FCC in accordance with FCC procedural rules unless this State elects to preempt FCC regulation of pole attachment rates, terms, and conditions of access; provided, however, that nothing contained in this section shall be construed as affecting the right of either party to seek relief from any court or agency of competent jurisdiction in connection with the negotiation, arbitration, and approval of interconnection agreements under 47 U.S.C. § Section 252.