Effect of location of computational domain boundaries Sample Clauses

Effect of location of computational domain boundaries. ‌ The size of the computational domain should be carefully chosen. Domain boundaries should be located far enough from the area of interest in order to minimize the impact of the boundary conditions on the results. In the case of hydrogen dispersion in a vented enclosure, the computational domain should be expanded in order to include not only the enclosure, but also the area surrounded the enclosure. Vents are areas of great importance with complex flow around them, therefore it is necessary to ensure that the boundary conditions have no impact on them. In ignition and fire modelling it is important to include sufficient expanse of ambient atmosphere into the domain design to prevent the undesirable impact of the outer boundary conditions on the numerical solution. Modelling of the fire in the enclosure typically requires the addition of an external domain outside of the openings in order to ensure proper boundary conditions. It is recommended to move the “far field” boundary to a distance of up to two characteristic sizes from the fire enclosure. While removal of outer boundaries to a large distance from the main simulation area of interest may significantly increase computational costs, which would appear to be spent on 19 xxxxx://xxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx/forum/#!topic/fds-smv/jmIyOy2wzFA (accessed 10-02-2016) areas where no phenomena of interest take place, the experience of numerical simulations of both ignited and unignited releases performed at Ulster University emphasizes the advisability to move the ambient boundary as far as practically possible from the release origin/vent location. In deflagration modelling, the extent of the domain has the potential to greatly affect the results of computations. If the domain is too small the propagation of the pressure wave will not be correctly captured. Generally, the domain should be much larger than the expected flammable volume. The effect of changing computational domain size was shown in the benchmark problem SBEP-V20 (Xxxxxxxxxxxx et al. 2010) where an increase of the size of the computational domain produced a significant improvement in the agreement between simulation results and the experimental measurements. Therefore it is always essential to investigate the effect of the size of the computational domain on the simulation results, performing the same simulation with an increasingly bigger domain until the effect on the relevant variables becomes negligible. Such sensitivity tests on the extent of the co...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Effect of location of computational domain boundaries

  • Effect of Non-Compliance Failure to comply with the requirements set forth herein may result in termination of this Agreement and/or ineligibility for award of future contracts.

  • Transfer or Deletion of Student Data The Provider shall review, on an annual basis, whether the Student Data it has received pursuant to the DPA continues to be needed for the purpose(s) of the Service Agreement and this DPA. If any of the Student Data is no longer needed for purposes of the Service Agreement and this DPA, the Provider will provide written notice to the LEA as to what Student Data is no longer needed. The Provider will delete or transfer Student Data in readable form to the LEA, as directed by the LEA (which may be effectuated through Exhibit D of the DPA), within 30 calendar days if the LEA requests deletion or transfer of the Student Data and shall provide written confirmation to the LEA of such deletion or transfer. Upon termination of the Service Agreement between the Provider and LEA, Provider shall conduct a final review of Student Data within 60 calendar days. If the LEA receives a request from a parent, as that term is defined in 105 ILCS 10/2(g), that Student Data being held by the Provider be deleted, the LEA shall determine whether the requested deletion would violate State and/or federal records laws. In the event such deletion would not violate State or federal records laws, the LEA shall forward the request for deletion to the Provider. The Provider shall comply with the request and delete the Student Data within a reasonable time period after receiving the request. Any provision of Student Data to the LEA from the Provider shall be transmitted in a format readable by the LEA.

  • Notification of Changes Subscriber agrees and covenants to notify the Company immediately upon the occurrence of any event prior to the consummation of this Offering that would cause any representation, warranty, covenant or other statement contained in this Agreement to be false or incorrect or of any change in any statement made herein occurring prior to the consummation of this Offering.

  • Certification Regarding Prohibition of Certain Terrorist Organizations (Tex Gov. Code 2270) Vendor certifies that Vendor is not a company identified on the Texas Comptroller’s list of companies known to have contracts with, or provide supplies or services to, a foreign organization designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the U.S. Secretary of State. Does Vendor certify? 3 Yes

  • COMPLIANCE WITH BREACH NOTIFICATION AND DATA SECURITY LAWS Contractor shall comply with the provisions of the New York State Information Security Breach and Notification Act (General Business Law § 899-aa and State Technology Law § 208) and commencing March 21, 2020 shall also comply with General Business Law § 899-bb.

  • Incorporation of Schedules The Schedules identified in this Agreement are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.

  • Adoption of Subsequent Orders to Incorporate Terms That a State Mortgage Regulator, if deemed necessary under the laws and regulations of the corresponding Participating State, may issue a separate administrative order to adopt and incorporate the terms and conditions of this Agreement. A State Mortgage Regulator may sua sponte issue such subsequent order without the review and approval of Respondent provided the subsequent order does not amend, alter, or otherwise change the terms of the Agreement. In the event a subsequent order amends, alters, or otherwise changes the terms of the Agreement, the terms of the Agreement, as set forth herein, will control.

  • EFFECT OF COMPLIANCE Compliance with and fulfillment of this Agreement shall be deemed to resolve all issues raised in the NOV.

  • Certification Regarding Prohibition of Boycotting Israel (Tex Gov. Code 2271) If (a) Vendor is not a sole proprietorship; (b) Vendor has ten (10) or more full-time employees; and (c) this Agreement or any agreement with a TIPS Member under this procurement has value of $100,000 or more, the following certification shall apply; otherwise, this certification is not required. Vendor certifies, where applicable, that neither the Vendor, nor any affiliate, subsidiary, or parent company of Vendor, if any, boycotts Israel, and Vendor agrees that Vendor and Vendor Companies will not boycott Israel during the term of this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “boycott” shall mean and include refusing to deal with, terminating business activities with, or otherwise taking any action that is intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations with Israel, or with a person or entity doing business in Israel or in an Israeli-controlled territory but does not include an action made for ordinary business purposes. When applicable, does Vendor certify? Yes

  • Effect of Finding U.S. Indicia a) If none of the U.S. indicia listed in subparagraph B(1) of this section are discovered in the enhanced review of High Value Accounts described above, and the account is not identified as held by a Specified U.S. Person in subparagraph D(4) of this section, then no further action is required until there is a change in circumstances that results in one or more U.S. indicia being associated with the account.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.