ETO Scheduling Dispute Resolution Procedure Sample Clauses

ETO Scheduling Dispute Resolution Procedure. Whenever ETO scheduling decisions involving two (2) or more RNs wanting the same ETO day(s) cannot be worked out on the nursing unit level itself, ETO scheduling decisions by RRMC may be challenged by an affected RN through the following procedure:  Challenges to ETO schedule decisions must be initiated within ten (10) days of vacation schedule decisions.  Within ten (10) days thereafter, a committee of one management official, one Association representative, and one RN from the affected nursing unit selected by nursing unit RNs, will hear and make recommendations on the dispute. Committee members will be selected each April, and will serve on a one-year basis thereafter.  The committee's recommendation will be accepted by management unless clearly inconsistent with patient care requirements, as determined by the Vice President for Nursing. If the procedures under Articles 9.4, 9.5, and 9.6 are not followed, the grievance procedure will apply.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
ETO Scheduling Dispute Resolution Procedure. Whenever ETO 23 scheduling decisions involving two (2) or more RNs wanting the same ETO day(s) cannot 24 be worked out on the nursing unit level itself, ETO scheduling decisions by ARRMC may 25 be challenged by an affected RN through the following procedure: 26  Challenges to ETO schedule decisions must be initiated within 27 ten (10) days of vacation schedule decisions. 28  Within ten (10) days thereafter, a committee of one management 29 official, one Association representative, and one RN from the 30 affected nursing unit selected by nursing unit RNs, will hear and 31 make recommendations on the dispute. Committee members will 32 be selected each April, and will serve on a one-year basis 33 thereafter.
Sample 1
ETO Scheduling Dispute Resolution Procedure. Whenever ETO scheduling 31 decisions involving two (2) or more RNs wanting the same ETO day(s) cannot be 32 worked out on the nursing unit level itself, ETO scheduling decisions by ARRMC may be 33 challenged by an affected RN through the following procedure: 34 1 • Challenges to ETO schedule decisions must be initiated within ten (10) days of 2 vacation schedule decisions.
Sample 1

Related to ETO Scheduling Dispute Resolution Procedure

  • Dispute Resolution Procedure 21.1 All disputes or grievances arising between the Parties shall as far as practical be resolved at the workplace level through consultation. Accordingly the following procedure must be followed:

  • Dispute Resolution Procedures (a) In the event a dispute arises about the interpretation, application, calculation of Loss, or calculation of payments or otherwise with respect to this Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement (“SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item”), then the Receiver and the Assuming Institution shall make every attempt in good faith to resolve such items within sixty (60) days following the receipt of a written description of the SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item, with notification of the possibility of taking the matter to arbitration (the date on which such 60-day period expires, or any extension of such period as the parties hereto may mutually agree to in writing, herein called the “Resolution Deadline Date”). If the Receiver and the Assuming Institution resolve all such items to their mutual satisfaction by the Resolution Deadline Date, then within thirty (30) days following such resolution, any payment due as a result of such resolution shall be made arising from the settlement of the SF Shared-Loss Dispute.

  • Dispute Resolution Process Any claim, dispute or other matter in question not resolved by the process identified in Paragraph

  • Governing Law and Dispute Resolution Procedure 34.1 This Agreement and any dispute or claim (including any non-contractual dispute or claim) arising out of or in connection with it or its subject matter, shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of England and Wales.

  • Informal Dispute Resolution Process 1. In the event there is a dispute under this Centralized Contract, the Contractor, OGS and Authorized User agree to exercise their best efforts to resolve the dispute as soon as possible. The Contractor, OGS and Authorized User shall, without delay, continue to perform their respective obligations under this Centralized Contract which are not affected by the dispute. Primary responsibility for resolving any dispute arising under this Centralized Contract shall rest with the Authorized User’s Contractor Coordinators and the Contractor’s Account Executive and the State & Local Government Regional General Manager.

  • I2 Dispute Resolution I2.1 The Parties shall attempt in good faith to negotiate a settlement to any dispute between them arising out of or in connection with the Contract within twenty (20) Working Days of either Party notifying the other of the dispute and such efforts shall involve the escalation of the dispute to the finance director of the Contractor and the commercial director of the Authority.

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution Process Owner may establish a dispute resolution process to be utilized in advance of that outlined in Tex. Gov’t Code, Chapter 2260.

  • Commencing Dispute Resolution 13.3.1 Dispute Resolution shall commence upon one Party’s receipt of written Notice of a controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or its breach. No Party may pursue any claim unless such written Notice has first been given to the other Party. There are three (3) separate Dispute Resolution methods:

  • CENTRAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS The following process pertains exclusively to disputes and grievances on central matters that have been referred to the central process. In accordance with the School Board Collective Bargaining Act, 2014 central matters may also be grieved locally, in which case local grievance processes will apply. In the event that central language is being grieved locally, the local parties shall provide the grievance to their respective central agents.

  • Dispute Resolutions Parties agree to arbitration of dispute in Houston, Texas, USA.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.