The Dispute. 15.2.1 An FCM and or the Union who has a difference or dispute with the Company, or a dispute with respect to the interpretation of the Collective Agreement shall first discuss the matter with their supervisor with a view to achieving prompt settlement thereof. This discussion will occur as soon as reasonably possible and the process shall use the following steps:
The Dispute. In this Agreement, “
The Dispute. If the arbitrator finds that the Executive was terminated in violation of law or this Agreement, the parties agree that the arbitrator acting hereunder shall be empowered to provide the Executive with any remedy available should the matter have been tried in a court, including equitable and/or legal remedies, compensatory damages and back pay. The arbitrator's fees and expenses and all administrative fees and expenses associated with the filing of the arbitration (the "Fees") shall be borne by the non-prevailing party.
The Dispute. This Agreement is entered into with reference to a dispute between the Parties arising out of a certain investment by Pxxxxxxx in Royale Energy in the amount of one million two hundred eighty thousand dollars and no cents ($1,280,000.00) that Pxxxxxxx transferred to Royale Energy on or about July 26, 2016 (the “Dispute”).
The Dispute. The dispute relates to the proposal of the Defendant, the Council of the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames ("the Council") to control entry to a private road, Xxxxxx Road, Kingston-on-Thames, by an unmanned code-operated barrier ("the proposed barrier").The road provides access from a public road to what is known as the "Coombe Estate". The proposal is supported by the local residents' association, the Malden and Coombe Residents' Association ("MCRA"). It is opposed by the Claimants. They operate three schools and a training centre from premises situated adjacent to another private road (for most of its length), Xxxxxx Road, which is accessed from the east from Xxxxxx Road. The three schools are Marymount International School ("Marymount"), Holy Cross Preparatory School ("Holy Cross") and Rokeby School ("Rokeby"). They are owned and operated by the First Claimant, the Second Claimant and the Third Claimant respectively. The training centre, the Four Acres International Training Centre ("Four Acres"), is owned and operated by the Fourth Claimant ("Unilever") or a subsidiary company. During the course of the hearing, the collective term "institutions" was used to describe institutional owners and occupiers of premises on the Coombe Estate comprising three schools, two training centres, care homes and two golf clubs, as distinct from houses in domestic use.
The Dispute. The negotiations shall be conducted by executives who hold, at a minimum, the title of vice president and who have authority to settle the Dispute. All such negotiations shall be confidential and shall be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations for purposes of applicable rules of evidence.
The Dispute. A dispute has now arisen between the Parties regarding their respective duties and obligations under the Purchase and Sale Agreement and Note, including the payment of certain amounts by Radyne to Spar under the Note and certain claims by Radyne against Spar for certain offsets and credits resulting from various alleged duties owed under and breaches of the Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Dispute"). More specifically, Spar contends that Radyne owes Spar approximately $3,893,368 under the Note, that Radyne has failed to timely pay such amounts when due, and that, as a result, Radyne is in default under the terms and conditions of the Purchase and Sale Agreement and Note. Radyne disputes that such amounts are currently due and owing. Radyne contends that it is entitled to a number of indemnity obligations and offsets against any amounts otherwise due and owing pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement and Note as a result of various breaches of the representations, warranties, and indemnities provided by Spar in the Purchase and Sale Agreement, including various matters set forth, in part, in Radyne's letter of July 6, 1999 to Spar, its letter of June 23, 1999 to Spar regarding various patent infringement and other claims by Xxxxxx Electronics Corporation, and in various other correspondence. Spar disputes such matters.
The Dispute involves an appeal against a determination by the Tax Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal (or, for appeals lodged before 1 April 2009, a determination by the General or Special Commissioners or the VAT and Duties Tribunal) unless the Warrantor has obtained the opinion of Tax counsel of at least five years’ standing that there is a reasonable prospect that the appeal will succeed, the Buyer, the Company or the relevant Subsidiary shall have the conduct of the Dispute absolutely (without prejudice to its rights under this Tax Covenant) and shall be entitled to take such action as is reasonable in the circumstances to settle the Tax Claim.
The Dispute. Resolution Procedure shall be conducted in strict confidence and without prejudice to the rights of the Parties in any future legal proceedings. Except for each Party’s rights to seek interlocutory relief in the courts, neither Party may commence legal proceedings under the jurisdiction of the courts until twenty-one (21) days after the Parties have failed to reach a binding settlement by mediation (at which point the Dispute Resolution Procedure shall be deemed to be exhausted).
The Dispute. The main subject matter of the dispute is a small island called Pedra Branca situated in the middle of the Straits of Singapore at the entrance to the South China Sea. Pedra Branca has been part of Singapore’s territory since the 1840s. On 21 December 1979, Malaysia published a map entitled “Territorial Waters and Continental Shelf Boundaries of Malaysia”. By this map, Malaysia purported to include Pedra Branca within Malaysia’s territorial waters. Singapore duly lodged a protest with Malaysia against this paper claim on 14 February 1980.
