Facilities Design Clause Samples

Facilities Design. The training and visitors center design effort will commence with definition of the requirements from the stakeholders, including the upstream team, local and state stakeholders, the DOE, and the labor unions who will be engaged in the design, procurement, construction and operation of the plant and CO2 storage site. Existing similar facilities will be identified and evaluated to help guide developing the conceptual for the facilities. In addition, any local facilities of similar type will be evaluated to eliminate any duplication. • Initial Visitor/Research and Training Facilities Cost Estimate Complete – July 1, 2011 DECISION POINT 1* Project Definition – End of Phase I: In accordance with the provision “DECISION POINTS AND COORDINATION OF DOE DECISIONS REGARDING FUTUREGEN 2.0” (“DECISION POINTS provision”) in this Cooperative Agreement, DOE funding is not authorized beyond Phase I without the written approval of the Contracting Officer. As stated in the DECISION POINTS provision, DOE’s decision to authorize funding for Phase II is based in part on the Recipient’s progress toward meeting the Objectives of the Project and includes an evaluation of the Recipient’s progress toward meeting the Key Milestones and Deliverables. In particular, the following must be completed before DOE authorizes funding for Phase II: • Phase II Decision Point Application • Firm commitments for Recipient’s cost share requirements for Phase II consisting of o Financial Plan o Financial Commitment Letter(s) o Complete Pro Forma Model • Executed Cooperation and Technology Agreement • Final Draft CO2 Services Agreement(s) • Final Storage Site Selection • Critical Design and Operational Specifications at CO2 Transfer Point • Integrated Project Schedule Consistent with the Topical Report format and instructions prescribed under Attachment 3, the Recipient shall prepare and submit a detailed technical Topical Report discussing the technical results of the work performed under the Phase I SOPO tasks. This report will be submitted to the OSTI website no later than 60 days prior to the end of Phase I – Project Definition. In addition, the Recipient shall submit a “Decision Point Application” directly to the DOE Program Manager/Project Officer and the DOE Contract Specialist no later than 60 days prior to the end of Phase I – Project Definition. The Decision Point Application shall include the following information: 1. A report on Recipient’s progress towards meeting the objectives of the...
View SourceView Similar (2)
Facilities Design 
View Source

Related to Facilities Design

  • System Protection Facilities Developer shall, at its expense, install, operate and maintain System Protection Facilities as a part of the Large Generating Facility or Developer’s Attachment Facilities. Connecting Transmission Owner shall install at Developer’s expense any System Protection Facilities that may be required on the Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities or the New York State Transmission System as a result of the interconnection of the Large Generating Facility and Developer’s Attachment Facilities.

  • Facilities Study In analyzing and preparing the Facilities Study, and in designing and constructing the Attachment Facilities, Local Upgrades and/or Network Upgrades described in the Specifications attached to this ISA, Transmission Provider, the Interconnected Transmission Owner(s), and any other subcontractors employed by Transmission Provider have had to, and shall have to, rely on information provided by Interconnection Customer and possibly by third parties and may not have control over the accuracy of such information. Accordingly, NEITHER TRANSMISSION PROVIDER, THE INTERCONNECTED TRANSMISSION OWNER(s), NOR ANY OTHER SUBCONTRACTORS EMPLOYED BY TRANSMISSION PROVIDER OR INTERCONNECTED TRANSMISSION OWNER MAKES ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WHETHER ARISING BY OPERATION OF LAW, COURSE OF PERFORMANCE OR DEALING, CUSTOM, USAGE IN THE TRADE OR PROFESSION, OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH REGARD TO THE ACCURACY, CONTENT, OR CONCLUSIONS OF THE FACILITIES STUDY OR THE SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY IF A FACILITIES STUDY WAS NOT REQUIRED OR OF THE ATTACHMENT FACILITIES, THE LOCAL UPGRADES AND/OR THE NETWORK UPGRADES, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that Transmission Provider warrants that the Transmission Owner Interconnection Facilities and any Merchant Transmission Upgrades described in the Specifications will be designed and constructed (to the extent that Interconnected Transmission Owner is responsible for design and construction thereof) and operated in accordance with Good Utility Practice, as such term is defined in the Operating Agreement. Interconnection Customer acknowledges that it has not relied on any representations or warranties not specifically set forth herein and that no such representations or warranties have formed the basis of its bargain hereunder.

  • Facilities and Services The Company shall furnish the Executive with office space, secretarial and support staff, and such other facilities and services as shall be reasonably necessary for the performance of his duties under this Agreement.

  • External Hosting Facilities DST shall implement controls, consistent with applicable prevailing industry practices and standards, regarding the collection, use, storage and/or disclosure of Fund Data by an external hosting provider.

  • Trading Facilities Most open-outcry and electronic trading facilities are supported by computer-based component systems for the order-routing, execution, matching, registration or clearing of trades. As with all facilities and systems, they are vulnerable to temporary disruption or failure. Your ability to recover certain losses may be subject to limits on liability imposed by the system provider, the market, the clearing house and/or member firms. Such limits may vary; you should ask the firm with which you deal for details in this respect.