Common use of Grounds for refusal Clause in Contracts

Grounds for refusal. 1. The description does not fully disclose all the designs as required in Article 103(2)(a) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam, since the description does not point out all main appearance characteristics of the designs. This reason for refusal may be overcome by submitting a corrected version of description to replace the current description. 2. The registration contains multiple industrial designs but there is not any statement indicating that they are variants or a set of products, thus it does not meet the requirement on the uniformity of industrial property registration applications according to Article 101(1) and Article 101(3) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam. The designs in the registration are not significantly different from each other. Therefore, these designs should be claimed as variants. This reason for refusal may be overcome if the registration holder submits a corrected version of description to replace the current one, which shall indicate one of the designs as principle design and the other as variant.

Grounds for refusal. 1. The description does not fully disclose all the designs as required in Article 103(2)(a103(3) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam, since the description does not point out list all main appearance characteristics of the designs. This reason for refusal may be overcome by submitting a corrected version of description to replace the current description. 2. The registration contains multiple industrial designs but there is not any statement indicating that they are variants or a set of products, thus it does not meet the requirement on the uniformity of industrial property registration applications according to Article 101(1) and Article 101(3) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam. The designs in the registration are not significantly different from each other. Therefore, these designs should be claimed as variants. This reason for refusal may be overcome if the registration holder submits a corrected version of description to replace the current onenotification, which shall indicate one of the designs as principle design and the other others as variantvariants.

Grounds for refusal. 1. The description does not fully disclose all the designs design as required in Article 103(2)(a103(3) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam, since the description does not point out list all main appearance characteristics of the designsdesign. This reason for refusal may be overcome by submitting a corrected version of description to replace the current description. 2. The designs in the registration contains multiple industrial are not significantly different from the designs but there is not any statement indicating that they are variants or a set of productsin the registration DM/226158 with the same priority date. Therefore, thus it does the designs in the registration do not meet the requirement on of the uniformity of industrial property registration applications according to first-to-file principle as provided in Article 101(1) and Article 101(390(3) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam. The designs in the registration are not significantly different from each other. Therefore, these designs should be claimed as variants. This reason for refusal may be overcome if the registration holder submits a corrected version of description to replace the current one, which shall indicate one of the designs as principle design and the other as variant.

Grounds for refusal. 1. The description does not fully disclose all the designs as required in Article 103(2)(a103(3) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam, since the description does not point out list all main appearance characteristics of the designs. This reason for refusal may be overcome by submitting a corrected version of description to replace the current description. 2. The registration contains multiple two industrial designs but there is not any statement indicating that they are variants or a set of products, thus it does not meet the requirement on the uniformity of industrial property registration applications according to Article 101(1) and Article 101(3) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam. The designs in the registration are not significantly different from each other. Therefore, these designs should be claimed as variants. This reason for refusal may be overcome if the registration holder submits a corrected version of description to replace the current onenotification, which shall indicate one of the designs as principle design and the other as variant.

Grounds for refusal. 1. The description does not fully disclose all the designs as required in Article 103(2)(a103(3) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam, since the description does not point out list all main appearance characteristics of the designs. This reason for refusal may be overcome by submitting a corrected version of description to replace the current description. 2. The registration contains multiple industrial designs but there is not any statement indicating that they are variants or a set of products; thus, thus it does not meet the requirement on the uniformity of industrial property registration applications according to Article 101(1) and Article 101(3) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam. The designs in the registration are not significantly different from each other. Therefore, these designs should be claimed as variants. This reason for refusal may be overcome if the registration holder submits a corrected version of description to replace the current onenotification, which shall indicate one of the designs as principle design and the other as variant. 3. Design 1 and Design 2 in the registration are not significantly different from the designs in the registration DM/222063 with the same priority date; therefore, the registration do not meet the requirement of the first-to-file principle as provided in Article 90(3) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam.

Grounds for refusal. 1. The description does not fully disclose all the designs as required in Article 103(2)(a) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam, since the description does not point out all main appearance characteristics of the designs. This reason for refusal may be overcome by submitting a corrected version of description to replace the current descriptionone. 2. The registration contains multiple industrial designs but there is not any statement indicating that they are variants or a set of products, thus it does not meet the requirement on the uniformity of industrial property registration applications according to Article 101(1) and Article 101(3) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam. The designs in the registration are not significantly different from each other. Therefore, these designs design should be claimed as variants. This reason for refusal may be overcome if the registration holder submits a corrected version of description to replace the current one, which shall indicate one of the designs as principle design and the other as variant.

Grounds for refusal. 1. The description does not fully disclose all the designs design as required in Article 103(2)(a) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam, since the description does not point out all main appearance characteristics of the designsdesign. This reason for refusal may be overcome by submitting a corrected version of description to replace the current description. 2. The Design in the registration contains multiple industrial designs but there is are not any statement indicating that they are variants or a set of productssignificantly different from the design in the registration DM/222712 with the earlier priority date; therefore, thus it does the design in the registration do not meet the requirement on of the uniformity of industrial property registration applications according to first-to-file principle as provided in Article 101(1) and Article 101(390(2) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam. The designs in the registration are not significantly different from each other. Therefore, these designs should be claimed as variants. This reason for refusal may be overcome if the registration holder submits a corrected version of description to replace the current one, which shall indicate one of the designs as principle design and the other as variant.