Common use of Grounds for refusal Clause in Contracts

Grounds for refusal. 1. The description does not fully disclose the design as required in Article 103(3) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam, since the description does not list all main appearance characteristics of the design. This reason for refusal may be overcome by submitting a corrected version of description to replace the current description. 2. The description includes the disclaimer, therefore the claimed object is not the whole article. Thus, the subject matter contained in the registration is not circulated independently, therefore it is not the object of protection as an industrial design as provided in Article 4(13) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam and in Article 33(2)(b) of Circular No. 01/2007/TT-BKHCN. This reason for refusal may be overcome if the registration holder submits a corrected version of description in which the disclaimer has been removed. 3. The reproductions include broken lines, therefore the claimed object is not the whole article. Thus, the subject matter contained in the registration is not circulated independently, therefore it is not the object of protection as an industrial design as provided in Article 4(13) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam and in Article 33(2)(b) of Circular No. 01/2007/TT-BKHCN. This reason for refusal may be overcome if the registration holder submits a corrected set of reproductions with the broken lines being replaced with solid lines.

Grounds for refusal. 1. The description does not fully disclose the design as required in Article 103(3103(2)(a) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam, since the description does not list point out all main appearance characteristics of the design. This reason for refusal may be overcome by submitting a corrected version of description to replace the current description. 2. The description includes the disclaimer, therefore the claimed object is not the whole article. Thus, the subject matter contained in the registration is not circulated independently, therefore it is not the object of protection as an industrial design as provided in Article 4(13) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam and in Article 33(2)(b) of Circular No. 01/2007/TT-BKHCN. This reason for refusal may be overcome if the registration holder submits a corrected version of description in which the disclaimer has been removed. 3. The reproductions include broken lines, therefore the claimed object is not the whole article. Thus, the subject matter contained in the registration is not circulated independently, therefore it is not the object of protection as an industrial design as provided in Article 4(13) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam and in Article 33(2)(b) of Circular No. 01/2007/TT-BKHCN. This reason for refusal may be overcome if the registration holder submits a corrected set of reproductions with the broken lines being replaced with solid lines.

Grounds for refusal. 1. The description does not fully disclose the design as required in Article 103(3103(2)(a) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam, since the description does not list point out all main appearance characteristics of the design. This reason for refusal may be overcome by submitting a corrected version of description to replace the current description. 2. The reproductions of the design do not include the perspective view, the left view, the right view, the top view and the bottom view. Therefore, the reproductions do not include all the required views of the design, thus they are not sufficient to disclose fully the design as required in Article 103(4) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam. This reason for refusal may be overcome by submitting the missing views. It must be noted that the new set of reproductions must not change the gist of the design. 3. The description includes the disclaimer, therefore the claimed object is not the whole article. Thus, the subject matter contained in the registration is not circulated independently, therefore it is not the object of protection as an industrial design as provided in Article 4(13) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam and in Article 33(2)(b) of Circular No. 01/2007/TT-BKHCN. This reason for refusal may be overcome if the registration holder submits a corrected version of description in which the disclaimer has been removed. 34. The reproductions include broken lines, therefore the claimed object is not the whole article. Thus, the subject matter contained in the registration is not circulated independently, therefore it is not the object of protection as an industrial design as provided in Article 4(13) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam and in Article 33(2)(b) of Circular No. 01/2007/TT-BKHCN. This reason for refusal may be overcome if the registration holder submits a corrected set of reproductions with the broken lines being replaced with solid lines.

Grounds for refusal. 1. The description does not fully disclose all the design designs as required in Article 103(3) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam, since the description does not list all main appearance characteristics of the designdesigns. This reason for refusal may be overcome by submitting a corrected version of description to replace the current description. 2. The registration contains different industrial designs which are not variants or a set of products; thus, it does not meet the requirement on the uniformity of industrial property registration applications according to Article 101(1) and Article 101(3) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam. This reason for refusal may be overcome if the registration holder submits a declaration to separate the registration into different registrations in Viet Nam, each for one design. Each registration must have a separate description. 3. The description includes the disclaimer; therefore, therefore the claimed object is objects in the registration are not the whole articlearticles. Thus, the subject matter matters contained in the registration is are not circulated independently, therefore it is they are not the object objects of protection as an industrial design designs as provided in Article 4(13) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam and in Article 33(2)(b) of Circular No. 01/2007/TT-BKHCN. This reason for refusal may be overcome if the registration holder submits a corrected version of description in which the disclaimer has been removed. 3. The reproductions include broken lines, therefore the claimed object is not the whole article. Thus, the subject matter contained in the registration is not circulated independently, therefore it is not the object of protection as an industrial design as provided in Article 4(13) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam and in Article 33(2)(b) of Circular No. 01/2007/TT-BKHCN. This reason for refusal may be overcome if the registration holder submits a corrected set of reproductions with the broken lines being replaced with solid lines.