Common use of Grounds for refusal Clause in Contracts

Grounds for refusal. The industrial designs applied for registration does not meet the provisions of the Article 7 of the Law on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, because theirs significant features are identical with the features of the industrial designs from: No. 1 - EUIPO, (11) 008266308-0002, deposit date (00) 0000.00.00, publication date (00) 0000.00.00, owner: Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Richard-Xxxxxx-Xxx. 00, X-00000 Xxxxxxxx, ALEMANIA (DE); No. 2 - EUIPO, (11) 008266308-0001, deposit date (00) 0000.00.00, publication date (00) 0000.00.00, owner: Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Richard-Xxxxxx-Xxx. 00, X-00000 Xxxxxxxx, ALEMANIA (DE); (LAW of the Republic of Moldova on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, Art. 26 (1) b)) (1) An individual design shall be considered novel if no identical industrial design has become publicly known within the meaning of Article 10: a) in the case of a registered industrial design – before the filing date of the application for registration or, if priority is being claimed, before the date of priority of the industrial design for which protection is requested; or b) in the case of an unregistered industrial design – before the date of first disclosure of the industrial design for which protection is requested. (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1), industrial designs shall be deemed identical if their significant features differ only in non-essential details. Art. 26. (1) A design shall be refused registration, or, if the design has been registered, the design right shall be declared invalid: b) if it does not fulfil the requirements of Articles 7-11.

Grounds for refusal. The industrial designs no. 1, 2, 3, applied for registration does do not meet the provisions of the Article 7 8 of the Law on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, because theirs significant features are identical with the features of overall impression it produces on the informed user is not differs from the overall impression produced on such a user by the industrial designs from: No. 1 - EUIPOfrom WIPO, (11) 008266308-0002DM/081890, designs no. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, deposit date (00) 0000.00.0000.00.0000, publication date (00) 0000.00.0000.00.0000, owner: Xxxxx XxxxxxIntersnack Group GmbH & Co. KG, RichardXxxxx-Xxxxxx-Xxx. 00Xxxxxx 0, X-00000 Xxxxxxxx, ALEMANIA 00000 Xxxxxxxxxx (DE); No. 2 - EUIPO, (11) 008266308-0001, deposit date (00) 0000.00.00, publication date (00) 0000.00.00, owner: Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Richard-Xxxxxx-Xxx. 00, X-00000 Xxxxxxxx, ALEMANIA (DE); (LAW of the Republic of Moldova on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, Art. 26 (1) b)) (1) An individual industrial design shall be considered novel to have individual character if no identical the overall impression that it presents to an informed user is different from the overall impression that would be presented to such a user by any other industrial design has become already publicly known within the meaning of Article 10: a) in the case of a registered industrial design – before the filing date of the application for registration or, if priority is being claimed, before the date of priority of the industrial design for which protection is requestedpriority; or b) in the case of an unregistered industrial design – before the date of first disclosure of the industrial design for which protection is requested. (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)In assessing individuality, industrial designs account shall be deemed identical if their significant features differ only taken of the degree of the author’s freedom in non-essential detailscreating the industrial design, given the nature of the article and the specifics of the industrial or craft sector in question. Art. Art. 26. (1) A design shall be refused registration, or, if the design has been registered, the design right shall be declared invalid: b) if it does not fulfil the requirements of Articles 7-11.

Grounds for refusal. The industrial designs design applied for registration does not meet the provisions of the Article 7 of the Law on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, because theirs its significant features are identical with differ only in non-essential details from the features of the industrial designs design from: No. 1 - EUIPOUA, (11) 008266308-000235402, deposit date (00) 0000.00.00, publication date (00) 0000.00.00, owner: Xxxxx XxxxxxТОВАРИСТВО З ОБМЕЖНОЮ ВIДПОВIДАЛЬНIСТЮ «АКАМА» xxx.Xxxxxxxxx, Richard-Xxxxxx-Xxx0. 00м. Днiпро, X-00000 Xxxxxxxx, ALEMANIA 49022 (DE); No. 2 - EUIPO, (11UA) 008266308-0001, deposit date (00) 0000.00.00, publication date (00) 0000.00.00, owner: Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Richard-Xxxxxx-Xxx. 00, X-00000 Xxxxxxxx, ALEMANIA (DE); (LAW of the Republic of Moldova on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, Art. 26 (1) b)) (1) An individual design shall be considered novel if no identical industrial design has become publicly known within the meaning of Article 10: a) in the case of a registered industrial design – before the filing date of the application for registration or, if priority is being claimed, before the date of priority of the industrial design for which protection is requested; or b) in the case of an unregistered industrial design – before the date of first disclosure of the industrial design for which protection is requested. (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1), industrial designs shall be deemed identical if their significant features differ only in non-essential details. Art. Art. 26. (1) A design shall be refused registration, or, if the design has been registered, the design right shall be declared invalid: b) if it does not fulfil the requirements of Articles 7-11.

Grounds for refusal. The industrial designs applied for registration does not meet the provisions of the Article 7 of the Law on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, because theirs significant features are identical with the features of the industrial designs from: No. 1 - EUIPO, (11) 008266308-0002from WIPO registration number DM/207823, deposit date (00) 0000.00.002019.12.13, publication date (00) 0000.00.002020.06.19, owner: Xxxxx XxxxxxRENAULT s.a.s. 00/00 xxxx xx Xxxxx, Richard92100 BOULOGNE-Xxxxxx-Xxx. 00, X-00000 Xxxxxxxx, ALEMANIA BILLANCOURT (DE); No. 2 - EUIPO, (11FR) 008266308-0001, deposit date (00) 0000.00.00, publication date (00) 0000.00.00, owner: Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Richard-Xxxxxx-Xxx. 00, X-00000 Xxxxxxxx, ALEMANIA (DE); (LAW of the Republic of Moldova on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, Art. 26 (1) b)) (1) An individual design shall be considered novel if no identical industrial design has become publicly known within the meaning of Article 10: a) in the case of a registered industrial design – before the filing date of the application for registration or, if priority is being claimed, before the date of priority of the industrial design for which protection is requested; or b) in the case of an unregistered industrial design – before the date of first disclosure of the industrial design for which protection is requested. (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1), industrial designs shall be deemed identical if their significant features differ only in non-essential details. Art. 26. (1) A design shall be refused registration, or, if the design has been registered, the design right shall be declared invalid: b) if it does not fulfil the requirements of Articles 7-11.

Grounds for refusal. The industrial designs design applied for registration does not meet the provisions of the Article 7 of the Law on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, because theirs its significant features are identical with differ only in non-essential details from the features of the industrial designs from: No. 1 - EUIPO, design from EUIPO (11) 008266308-0002, deposit date (00) 0000.00.00, publication date (00) 0000.00.00, owner: Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Richard-Xxxxxx-Xxx. 00, X-00000 Xxxxxxxx, ALEMANIA (DE); No. 2 - EUIPO, (11) 008266308002815399-0001, deposit date (00) 0000.00.0000.00.0000, publication date (00) 0000.00.0000.00.0000, owner: Xxxxx XxxxxxLoxtop kft., Richard-Xxxxxx-XxxXxxxxx Xxxx xx 75. 002/2, X-00000 Xxxxxxxx1114, ALEMANIA Budapest (DE); HU) (LAW of the Republic of Moldova on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, Art. 26 (1) b)) (1) An individual design shall be considered novel if no identical industrial design has become publicly known within the meaning of Article 10: a) in the case of a registered industrial design – before the filing date of the application for registration or, if priority is being claimed, before the date of priority of the industrial design for which protection is requested; or b) in the case of an unregistered industrial design – before the date of first disclosure of the industrial design for which protection is requested. (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1), industrial designs shall be deemed identical if their significant features differ only in non-essential details. Art. Art. 26. (1) A design shall be refused registration, or, if the design has been registered, the design right shall be declared invalid: b) if it does not fulfil the requirements of Articles 7-11.

Grounds for refusal. The industrial designs no. 1, 2, 3, applied for registration does do not meet the provisions of the Article 7 8 of the Law on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, because theirs significant features are identical with the features of overall impression it produces on the informed user is not differs from the overall impression produced on such a user by the industrial designs from: No. 1 - EUIPOfrom WIPO, (11) 008266308-0002DM/081890, designs no. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, deposit date (00) 0000.00.0000.00.0000, publication date (00) 0000.00.0000.00.0000, owner: Xxxxx XxxxxxIntersnack Group GmbH & Co. KG, Richard-XxxxxxXxxxx-Xxx. 00-xXxxxxxx 0, X-00000 Xxxxxxxx, ALEMANIA 00000 Xxxxxxxxxx (DE); No. 2 - EUIPO, (11) 008266308-0001, deposit date (00) 0000.00.00, publication date (00) 0000.00.00, owner: Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Richard-Xxxxxx-Xxx. 00, X-00000 Xxxxxxxx, ALEMANIA (DE); D (LAW of the Republic of Moldova on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, Art. 26 (1) b)) (1) An individual industrial design shall be considered novel to have individual character if no identical the overall impression that it presents to an informed user is different from the overall impression that would be presented to such a user by any other industrial design has become already publicly known within the meaning of Article 10: a) in the case of a registered industrial design – –before the filing date of the application for registration or, if priority is being claimed, before the date of priority of the industrial design for which protection is requestedpriority; or b) in the case of an unregistered industrial design – –before the date of first disclosure of the industrial design for which protection is requested. (2) For In assessing individuality, account in creating the purposes industrial design, given the nature of paragraph (1), the article and the specifics of the industrial designs shall be deemed identical if their significant features differ only or craft sector in non-essential detailsquestion. Art. Art. 26. (1) A design shall be refused registration, or, if the design has been registered, the design right shall be declared invalid: b) if it does not fulfil the requirements of Articles 7-11.