Input from Students Sample Clauses

Input from Students. VII.6.1.1 In the case of Tenure/Permanency and Promotion applications, input shall be sought from the candidate’s former students. The Chair of the Committee shall contact individuals (including graduate students, as appropriate) whom the candidate has taught while at Trent, requesting comments on the candidate’s teaching. Approximately half of the individuals to be contacted should be named by the candidate, and approximately half by the Committee. The individuals contacted shall not be registered in any course taught by the candidate during the current academic year. Individuals shall be given at least ten (10) working days to provide a response. Written and signed views received from former students will be added to the candidate’s file. VII.6.1.2 In the case of consideration for Tenure/Permanency, input shall be sought from between forty and sixty students of the candidate in accordance with Article VII.6.1.1. In cases where the candidate has taught fewer than fifty students, the Chair of the Committee shall contact as many students that the candidate has taught as possible. VII.6.1.3 In the case of consideration for Promotion to Full Professor where the candidate wishes to be considered under the criteria of being entirely satisfactory in research and very highly regarded in teaching, input shall be sought from at least eighty former students of the candidate in accordance with Article VII.6. VII.6.1.4 In the case of consideration for Promotion to Full Professor where the candidate wishes to be considered under the criteria of being entirely satisfactory in teaching and very highly regarded in research, input shall be sought from between forty and sixty former students of the candidate in accordance with VII.6.1.1.
Input from Students. VII.6.1.1 In the case of Tenure and Promotion applications, input shall be sought from the candidate’s former students. The Chair of the Committee shall contact individuals (including graduate students, as appropriate) whom the candidate has taught while at Trent, requesting comments on the candidate’s teaching. Approximately half of the individuals to be contacted should be named by the candidate, and approximately half by the Committee. The individuals contacted shall not be registered in any course taught by the candidate during the current academic year. Individuals shall be given at least ten

Related to Input from Students

  • Deductions from Sick Leave A deduction shall be made from accumulated sick leave of all normal working days (exclusive of holidays) absent for sick leave.

  • Pilot Project – One Employer Two Homes Employment Opportunities Where the local parties enter into these agreements, the agreement shall include the following principles:

  • Distributions on Account of Separation from Service If and to the extent required to comply with Section 409A, no payment or benefit required to be paid under this Agreement on account of termination of the Executive’s employment shall be made unless and until the Executive incurs a “separation from service” within the meaning of Section 409A.

  • Performance Improvement Plan timely and accurate completion of key actions due within the reporting period 100 percent The Supplier will design and develop an improvement plan and agree milestones and deliverables with the Authority 3.2 The Authority may from time to time make changes to the KPIs measured as set out in paragraph 3.1 above and shall issue a replacement version to the Supplier. The Authority shall give notice In Writing of any such change to the KPIs measured and shall specify the date from which the replacement KPIs must be used for future reports. Such date shall be at least thirty (30) calendar days following the date of the notice to the Supplier.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. ▇▇▇ shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by ▇▇▇.