Common use of INSTITUTIONAL CAREER SUPPORT/PEER REVIEW Clause in Contracts

INSTITUTIONAL CAREER SUPPORT/PEER REVIEW. Section 1. Nothing in the “Procedures for Post-Tenure Review at Portland State University” shall affect or alter the Association’s ability to file a grievance, as provided in Article 28, that alleges a violation of such guidelines. Section 2. The guidelines must at a minimum: (a) Be in writing and be made available to members; (b) Establish job-relevant evaluation criteria; (c) Provide that the results of the review be in writing and provided to the member; (d) Provide that the member is entitled to meet with the reviewers; (e) Provide that the member is able to respond to the review by submitting a statement or comments, which shall be attached to the review; (f) Provide that the member may submit relevant materials to the reviewers; and (g) Provide that the member may request a review if one has not been provided within the time period provided for by the guidelines. Section 3. Results of any post-tenure review shall not be the basis for just cause for sanctions pursuant to Article 27 or unilateral changes in the faculty member’s letter of offer or supplemental letter of offer.

INSTITUTIONAL CAREER SUPPORT/PEER REVIEW. Section 1. Nothing in In the “Procedures for Postevent that post-Tenure Review at Portland State University” tenure review guidelines are adopted through the Faculty Senate process, nothing therein shall affect or alter the Association’s ability to file a grievance, as provided in Article 28, that alleges a violation of such guidelines. Section 2. The guidelines must at a minimum: (a) Be in writing and be made available to members; (b) Establish job-relevant evaluation criteria; (c) Provide that the results of the review be in writing and provided to the member; (d) Provide that the member is entitled to meet with the reviewers; (e) Provide that the member is able to respond to the review by submitting a statement or comments, which shall be attached to the review; (f) Provide that the member may submit relevant materials to the reviewers; and (g) Provide that the member may request a review if one has not been provided within the time period provided for by the guidelines. Section 3. Results of any post-tenure review shall not be the basis for just cause for sanctions pursuant to Article 27 or unilateral changes in the faculty member’s letter of offer or supplemental letter of offer.

INSTITUTIONAL CAREER SUPPORT/PEER REVIEW. ‌ Section 1. Nothing in the “Procedures for Post-Tenure Review at Portland State University” shall affect or alter the Association’s ability to file a grievance, as provided in Article 28, that alleges a violation of such guidelines. Section 2. The guidelines must at a minimum: (a) Be in writing and be made available to members; (b) Establish job-relevant evaluation criteria; (c) Provide that the results of the review be in writing and provided to the member; (d) Provide that the member is entitled to meet with the reviewers; (e) Provide that the member is able to respond to the review by submitting a statement or comments, which shall be attached to the review; (f) Provide that the member may submit relevant materials to the reviewers; and (g) Provide that the member may request a review if one has not been provided within the time period provided for by the guidelines. Section 3. Results of any post-tenure review shall not be the basis for just cause for sanctions pursuant to Article 27 or unilateral changes in the faculty member’s letter of offer or supplemental letter of offer.