Common use of Integrative Clause in Contracts

Integrative. Bridging the Gap between Information and Preser- vation Management‌ It is the aim of the ForgetIT approach to preservation to create a smooth transition be- tween active information use and preservation of information, which so far are some quite separate worlds. For this purpose, the PoF Reference Model should be integrative, bring- ing the Active System and the DPS closer together. Further details about foundations of synergetic preservation can be found in deliverable D5.1 [Xxxxxxx et al., 2013] and sub- sequent WP5 deliverables. However, due to the inherent long-term perspective of preservation-related solutions it is not the aim to build a strongly integrated, monolithic system. In the long run, it has to be foreseen that the Active System used as well as the employed DPS will change [Afrasiabi Rad et al., 2014]. Therefore, the idea is a flexible integration, which enables smooth bi-directional transition of information between the Active System and the DPS and, at the same time, is also prepared for major changes in the overall environment [Pa¨ iva¨ xxxxx et al., 2015]. A core part of integration is to enable the smooth transition of content to be preserved into the DPS and the sensible reactivation of content back into the Active System after a, possibly very long, period into the DPS. An integrative solution should also embrace the idea of a joint information space, where the information in the DPS stays conceptually accessible, e.g., visible in search results, even if the content is only available in the DPS. One part of achieving a smooth transition is to act as a pre-ingest system (or pre-access) and prepare information packages for delivery in either way. With highly automated pro- cedures for preparation of these packages according to agreements or requirements, preservation technology becomes easier to use and the quality of the information pack- ages becomes more consistent, which alleviate the burden of information package han- dling on both sides (see [Heutelbeck et al., 2009] and D5.2 [Xxxxxxx et al., 2014]). In ad- dition, an integrative system should also support the decisions on what to preserve for easing the integration of preservation into the information management workflows, finally aiming for an integrated information and preservation management workflow (as pre- sented, e.g., in D9.4 [Xxxx et al., 2015]). The automated selection process (appraisal) will be discussed in more detail in Section 2.4 and in the context of managed forgetting (see Section 3).

Integrative. Bridging the Gap between Information and Preser- vation Management‌ It is the aim of the ForgetIT approach to preservation to create a smooth transition be- tween active information use and preservation of information, which so far are some quite separate worlds. For this purpose, the PoF ForgetIT Reference Model should be integrative, bring- ing bringing the Active System and the DPS closer together. Further details about foundations founda- tions of synergetic preservation can be found in deliverable D5.1 [Xxxxxxx et al.ForgetIT, 20132013b] and sub- sequent following WP5 deliverables. However, due to the inherent long-term perspective of preservation-related solutions it is not the aim to build a strongly integrated, monolithic system. In the long run, it has to be foreseen that the Active System used as well as the employed DPS will change [Afrasiabi Rad et al., 2014]change. Therefore, the idea is a flexible integration, which enables smooth bi-directional transition of information between the Active System and the DPS and, at the same time, is also prepared for major changes in the overall environment environment. [Pa¨ iva¨ xxxxx Afrasiabi Rad et al., 2015]. 2014] A core part of integration is to enable the smooth transition of content to be preserved into the DPS and the sensible senseful reactivation of content back into the Active System after a, possibly a -possibly very long, long - period into the DPS. An integrative solution should also embrace the idea of a joint information space, where the information in the DPS stays conceptually accessible, e.g., visible in search results, even if the content is only available in the DPS. One part of achieving a smooth transition is to act as a pre-ingest system (or pre-access) and prepare information packages for delivery in either way. With highly automated pro- cedures for preparation of these packages according to agreements or requirements, preservation technology becomes easier to use and the quality of the information pack- ages packages becomes more consistent, which alleviate the burden of information package han- dling handling on both sides (see sides. [Heutelbeck et al.ForgetIT, 20092014b] and D5.2 [Xxxxxxx et al., 2014]). In ad- ditionaddition, an integrative system should also support the decisions on what to preserve for easing the integration of preservation into the information management workflows, finally aiming for an integrated information and preservation management workflow (as pre- sented, e.g., in D9.4 [Xxxx et al., 2015])workflow. The automated selection process (appraisal) will be discussed in more detail in Section 2.4 and in the context of managed forgetting (see Section 33.1).

Integrative. Bridging the Gap between Information and Preser- vation Management‌ It is the aim of the ForgetIT approach to preservation to create a smooth transition be- tween active information use and preservation of information, which so far are some quite separate worlds. For this purpose, the PoF Reference Model should be integrative, bring- ing the Active System and the DPS closer together. Further details about foundations of synergetic preservation can be found in deliverable D5.1 [Xxxxxxx Nilsson et al., 2013] and sub- sequent WP5 deliverables. However, due to the inherent long-term perspective of preservation-related solutions it is not the aim to build a strongly integrated, monolithic system. In the long run, it has to be foreseen that the Active System used as well as the employed DPS will change [Afrasiabi Rad et al., 2014]. Therefore, the idea is a flexible integration, which enables smooth bi-directional transition of information between the Active System and the DPS and, at the same time, is also prepared for major changes in the overall environment [Pa¨ iva¨ xxxxx et al., 2015]. A core part of integration is to enable the smooth transition of content to be preserved into the DPS and the sensible reactivation of content back into the Active System after a, possibly very long, period into the DPS. An integrative solution should also embrace the idea of a joint information space, where the information in the DPS stays conceptually accessible, e.g., visible in search results, even if the content is only available in the DPS. One part of achieving a smooth transition is to act as a pre-ingest system (or pre-access) and prepare information packages for delivery in either way. With highly automated pro- cedures for preparation of these packages according to agreements or requirements, preservation technology becomes easier to use and the quality of the information pack- ages becomes more consistent, which alleviate the burden of information package han- dling on both sides (see [Heutelbeck et al., 2009] and D5.2 [Xxxxxxx Nilsson et al., 2014]). In ad- dition, an integrative system should also support the decisions on what to preserve for easing the integration of preservation into the information management workflows, finally aiming for an integrated information and preservation management workflow (as pre- sented, e.g., in D9.4 [Xxxx et al., 2015]). The automated selection process (appraisal) will be discussed in more detail in Section 2.4 and in the context of managed forgetting (see Section 3).

Integrative. Bridging the Gap between Information and Preser- vation Management‌ It is the aim of the ForgetIT approach to preservation to create a smooth transition be- tween active information use and preservation of information, which so far are some quite separate worlds. For this purpose, the PoF ForgetIT Reference Model should be integrative, bring- ing bringing the Active System and the DPS closer together. Further details about foundations founda- tions of synergetic preservation can be found in deliverable D5.1 [Xxxxxxx et al., 2013?] and sub- sequent following WP5 deliverables. However, due to the inherent long-term perspective of preservation-related solutions it is not the aim to build a strongly integrated, monolithic system. In the long run, it has to be foreseen that the Active System used as well as the employed DPS will change [Afrasiabi Rad et al., 2014]change. Therefore, the idea is a flexible integration, which enables smooth bi-directional transition of information between the Active System and the DPS and, at the same time, is also prepared for major changes in the overall environment environment. [Pa¨ iva¨ xxxxx et al., 2015]. ?] A core part of integration is to enable the smooth transition of content to be preserved into the DPS and the sensible senseful reactivation of content back into the Active System after a, possibly a -possibly very long, long - period into the DPS. An integrative solution should also embrace the idea of a joint information space, where the information in the DPS stays conceptually accessible, e.g., visible in search results, even if the content is only available in the DPS. One part of achieving a smooth transition is to act as a pre-ingest system (or pre-access) and prepare information packages for delivery in either way. With highly automated pro- cedures for preparation of these packages according to agreements or requirements, preservation technology becomes easier to use and the quality of the information pack- ages packages becomes more consistent, which alleviate the burden of information package han- dling handling on both sides (see sides. [Heutelbeck et al., 2009ForgetIT(2014a)] and D5.2 [Xxxxxxx et al., 2014]). In ad- ditionaddition, an integrative system should also support the decisions on what to preserve for easing the integration of preservation into the information management workflows, finally aiming for an integrated information and preservation management workflow (as pre- sented, e.g., in D9.4 [Xxxx et al., 2015])workflow. The automated selection process (appraisal) will be discussed in more detail in Section 2.4 and in the context of managed forgetting (see Section 33.1).