Justification, Commercial Impracticability Sample Clauses

Justification, Commercial Impracticability. The application for modification to the Franchise Agreement shall state the Grantee's justifications for such proposed modification. Grantee shall indicate within such justifications any projected technical, financial and service impacts, which such proposed modifications intend to remedy. Where the Grantee has indicated commercial impracticability as a justification for modification, the Grantee shall show any changes in conditions arising since the execution of the Franchise Agreement; that such change in conditions was not foreseeable at the time of execution of the Franchise Agreement; and, that such change in conditions was beyond the Control of the Grantee. The burden of proof to justify a claim of commercial impracticability shall be borne by the Grantee.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Justification, Commercial Impracticability

  • Rationale/Justification The Cisco Certified Network Associate Security (CCNA® Security) certification represents industry acknowledgement of technical skill attainment of competencies in the IT Security program.

  • Justification For fishing of marine fish, prawn, and other aquatic organism, different treatment is given to Myanmar citizens according to the provisions of the Myanma Marine Fisheries Law (1990).

  • FORCE MAJEURE CIRCUMSTANCES Lithium Hosting, llc CANNOT and WILL NOT be liable for any failure or delay in doing its professional duties resulting from circumstances beyond its physical control. Such circumstances may represent acts of any governmental body, war, rebellion, sabotage, embargo, fire, flood or other natural disaster, strike or other labor disturbances, interruption of or delay in transportation, unavailability of, interruption or delay in telecommunications or third party services (including DNS propagation), failure of third party software or hardware, or inability to obtain raw materials, supplies or power used in or equipment needed for provisioning of the Services.

  • CORRECTIVE MEASURE The contractor shall repair any deficiencies in excess of the performance guideline.

  • Recommended language skills The sending institution, following agreement with the receiving institution, is responsible for providing support to its nominated candidates so that they can have the recommended language skills at the start of the study or teaching period: Receiving institution [Erasmus code] Optional: Subject area Language of instruc­tion 1 Language of instruc­tion 2 Recommended language of instruction level4 Student Mobility for Studies [Minimum recommended level: B1] Staff Mobility for Teaching [Minimum recommended level: B2] I NAPOLI01 Italian English IT-B1 EN-B2; IT-B2 Partner Institution code

  • Corrective Measures If the Participating Generator fails to meet or maintain the requirements set forth in this Agreement and/or the CAISO Tariff, the CAISO shall be permitted to take any of the measures, contained or referenced in the CAISO Tariff, which the CAISO deems to be necessary to correct the situation.

  • Non-Grievability No dispute over a claim for any benefits extended by this Health and Welfare Fund shall be subject to the grievance procedure.

  • Updated Information Submission by Interconnection Customer The updated information submission by the Interconnection Customer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. The Interconnection Customer shall submit a completed copy of the Electric Generating Unit data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the LGIP. It shall also include any additional information provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies. Information in this submission shall be the most current Electric Generating Unit design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with the Participating TO and CAISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Interconnection Customer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information. If the Interconnection Customer's data is materially different from what was originally provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies, then the Participating TO and the CAISO will conduct appropriate studies pursuant to the LGIP to determine the impact on the Participating TO’s Transmission System and affected portions of the CAISO Controlled Grid based on the actual data submitted pursuant to this Article 24.3. The Interconnection Customer shall not begin Trial Operation until such studies are completed and all other requirements of this LGIA are satisfied.

  • Reasonable Suspicion Testing The Employer may, but does not have a legal duty to, request or require an employee to undergo drug and alcohol testing if the Employer or any supervisor of the employee has a reasonable suspicion (a belief based on specific facts and rational inferences drawn from those facts) related to the performance of the job that the employee:

  • CONSULTATIVE MECHANISMS Effective consultation is essential for continuous workplace reform and such consultation can take place at any time during the life of a project. Consultative Committees may be set up on larger projects for this purpose.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.