Mailing Activity Review. Mailing activity by participants will be reviewed in the calendar months preceding and following the end of the program. The qualifying volume recorded for participants may be adjusted in accordance with the following:
Mailing Activity Review Sample Clauses
Related to Mailing Activity Review
CONTRACT SALES ACTIVITY REPORT Each calendar quarter, Vendor must provide a contract sales activity report (Report) to the Sourcewell Contract Administrator assigned to this Contract. A Report must be provided regardless of the number or amount of sales during that quarter (i.e., if there are no sales, Vendor must submit a report indicating no sales were made). The Report must contain the following fields: • Customer Name (e.g., City of Staples Highway Department); • Customer Physical Street Address; • Customer City; • Customer State/Province; • Customer Zip Code; • Customer Contact Name; • Customer Contact Email Address; • Customer Contact Telephone Number; • Sourcewell Assigned Entity/Participating Entity Number; • Item Purchased Description; • Item Purchased Price; • Sourcewell Administrative Fee Applied; and • Date Purchase was invoiced/sale was recognized as revenue by Vendor.
Independence from Material Breach Determination Except as set forth in Section X.D.1.c, these provisions for payment of Stipulated Penalties shall not affect or otherwise set a standard for OIG’s decision that CHSI has materially breached this CIA, which decision shall be made at OIG’s discretion and shall be governed by the provisions in Section X.D, below.
Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).
Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.
Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.
Professional Development Reimbursement Management will provide reimbursement for approved professional development expenses for Lieutenants and Sergeants. Funds may be used for the purpose of improving job performance, maintaining and increasing proficiency, preparing Lieutenants and Sergeants for greater responsibility, or increasing promotional opportunities. Management must approve of the specific professional development request in advance. Denial will require written notification to the requesting Lieutenant or Sergeant.
Registry Functions Activity Report This report shall be compiled in a comma separated-value formatted file as specified in RFC 4180. The file shall be named “gTLD-activity-yyyymm.csv”, where “gTLD” is the gTLD name; in case of an IDN-TLD, the A-label shall be used; “yyyymm” is the year and month being reported. The file shall contain the following fields: Field # Field Name Description 01 operational-registrars number of operational registrars at the end of the reporting period 02 ramp-up-registrars number of registrars that have received a password for access to OT&E at the end of the reporting period 03 pre-ramp-up-registrars number of registrars that have requested access, but have not yet entered the ramp-up period at the end of the reporting period 06 web-whois-queries number of Web-based Whois queries responded during the reporting period, not including searchable Whois 09 dns-udp-queries-responded number of DNS queries received over UDP transport that were responded during the reporting period 10 dns-tcp-queries-received number of DNS queries received over TCP transport during the reporting period 11 dns-tcp-queries-responded number of DNS queries received over TCP transport that were responded during the reporting period 12 srs-dom-check number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “check” requests responded during the reporting period 13 srs-dom-create number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “create” requests responded during the reporting period 14 srs-dom-delete number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “delete” requests responded during the reporting period 15 srs-dom-info number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “info” requests responded during the reporting period 16 srs-dom-renew number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “renew” requests responded during the reporting period 17 srs-dom-rgp-restore-report number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name RGP “restore” requests delivering a restore report responded during the reporting period 18 srs-dom-rgp-restore-request number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name RGP “restore” requests responded during the reporting period 19 srs-dom-transfer-approve number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “transfer” requests to approve transfers responded during the reporting period 20 srs-dom-transfer-cancel number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “transfer” requests to cancel transfers responded during the reporting period 21 srs-dom-transfer-query number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “transfer” requests to query about a transfer responded during the reporting period 22 srs-dom-transfer-reject number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “transfer” requests to reject transfers responded during the reporting period 23 srs-dom-transfer-request number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “transfer” requests to request transfers responded during the reporting period 24 srs-dom-update number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “update” requests (not including RGP restore requests) responded during the reporting period 25 srs-host-check number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) host “check” requests responded during the reporting period 26 srs-host-create number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) host “create” requests responded during the reporting period 27 srs-host-delete number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) host “delete” requests responded during the reporting period 28 srs-host-info number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) host “info” requests responded during the reporting period 29 srs-host-update number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) host “update” requests responded during the reporting period 30 srs-cont-check number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “check” requests responded during the reporting period 32 srs-cont-delete number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “delete” requests responded during the reporting period 33 srs-cont-info number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “info” requests responded during the reporting period 34 srs-cont-transfer-approve number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “transfer” requests to approve transfers responded during the reporting period 35 srs-cont-transfer-cancel number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “transfer” requests to cancel transfers responded during the reporting period 36 srs-cont-transfer-query number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “transfer” requests to query about a transfer responded during the reporting period 37 srs-cont-transfer-reject number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “transfer” requests to reject transfers responded during the reporting period 38 srs-cont-transfer-request number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “transfer” requests to request transfers responded during the reporting period 39 srs-cont-update number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “update” requests responded during the reporting period The first line shall include the field names exactly as described in the table above as a “header line” as described in section 2 of RFC 4180. No other lines besides the ones described above shall be included. Line breaks shall be <U+000D, U+000A> as described in RFC 4180. For gTLDs that are part of a single-instance Shared Registry System, the Registry Functions Activity Report may include the total contact or host transactions for all the gTLDs in the system. REGISTRATION DATA PUBLICATION SERVICES
Professional Development Activities Professional development activities are activities initiated by individual faculty members or groups of faculty members and may include attendance at conferences, workshops or seminars which facilitate the following:
Professional Development Program (a) The parties agree to continue a Professional Development Program for the maintenance and development of the faculty members' professional competence and effectiveness. It is agreed that maintenance of currency of subject knowledge, the improvement of performance of faculty duties, and the maintenance and improvement of professional competence, including instructional skills, are the primary professional development activities of faculty members.
Co-Curricular Activities G. The enrollment of the student of employees who reside outside the District shall be subject to School Board Policy 3.02(3)f, Out-of-County Students.
