MD&A. The section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Preliminary Prospectus included in the Disclosure Materials and the Prospectus accurately and fully describes in all material respects (A) accounting policies that the Company believes are the most important in the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments (“Critical Accounting Policies”); (B) judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of the Critical Accounting Policies; and (C) the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions and an explanation thereof; and the Company’s management have reviewed and agreed with the selection, application and disclosure of the Critical Accounting Policies as described in the Disclosure Materials and the Prospectus and have consulted with its independent accountants with regard to such disclosure.
MD&A. Furnish Agent, upon its request, with respect to the financial statements referred to in Sections 9.7 and 9.8, a management discussion and analysis report relating to the Borrowers.
MD&A. The section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Registration Statement, General Disclosure Package and Final Prospectus is accurate. The Company does not have any off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements, and obligations, including, without limitation, relationships with unconsolidated entities that are contractually limited to narrow activities that facilitate the transfer of or access to assets by the Company, such as structured finance entities and special purpose entities that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on the liquidity of the Company.
MD&A. Concurrently with the delivery of the financial statements referred to in subsections (a) and (b) above, management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, including the Loan Parties’ consolidated liquidity and capital resources; and
MD&A. There are no transactions, arrangements or other relationships, including but not limited to off balance sheet transactions, which would be required to be included in the Offering Memorandum if the Offering Memorandum was a registration statement on Form S-1 by the Commission’s “Statement About Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (January 22, 2002) which are not so described or described as required.
MD&A. An additional 37,119 people were treated in 3 districts of Amuru (8,876), Kitgum (13,361) and Lamwo (14,882).
MD&A. Contemporaneously with the furnishing of a copy of each annual audit report pursuant to Section 6.1.1 and forty-five (45) days after the end of each month which is the last month of a Fiscal Quarter, including the fourth Fiscal Quarter of each Fiscal Year, a written statement of the Companies’ management setting forth a discussion of the Companies’ financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations.
MD&A. Furnish Agent and the Lenders, upon the Required Lenders’ request, with respect to the financial statements referred to in Sections 9.7 and 9.8, a management discussion and analysis report relating to the Borrowers.
MD&A. MDA is an approach that uses Model-based Deviation Analysis [HCW02]. It consists of formally modelling the nominal behaviour of the system and mod- xxxxxx deviations either in parallel with the nominal model or in its input – defined using NuSMV. As it is more concerned about input values, it may not apply to all SoS architectures and system types. In [JHMW06], the authors show how to model deviations directly in Simulink for Model-based Safety Analysis, but sug- gest that a better approach is to insert deviations automatically, which is left as future work.
MD&A. The Agreement between the UK and the USA for Cooperation in the Uses of Atomic Energy for Mutual Defence Purposes 19581 (Mutual Defence Agreement, or MDA) was drawn up in order to allow the UK and the USA to share nuclear technology and knowledge. Under the United States Atomic Energy Xxx 0000, usually known as the XxXxxxx Act, the USA was prohibited from sharing atomic energy information with other states. In 1954 the Act was amended to allow exchanges of information on civil aspects of atomic energy and limited exchanges on defence aspects. In 1958 the Act was amended again to allow greater cooperation in the military field with US allies, and in particular with those which had made “substantial progress” in the development of nuclear weapons. The UK was recognised as the only state fulfilling the substantial progress criterion. The possibility of cooperation with the UK was prominent in the Eisenhower administration’s thinking when it sought to amend the XxXxxxx Act, and the necessary legislation was introduced to Congress shortly after Eisenhower and Macmillan had issued their “declaration of interdependence” in October 1957. The MDA, which had been negotiated in parallel to the US legislation, was signed by the parties on 3 July 1958, three days after the passage of the amendments to the XxXxxxx Act. In its original form the MDA allowed the sharing of classified information relating to the development of defence plans, to training for the use of and defence against atomic weapons, to the atomic capabilities of potential enemies, to the development of delivery systems and to research in, and development and design of, military reactors. It also allowed the sale to the UK of one complete nuclear submarine propulsion plant, plus the uranium needed to fuel it over a ten year period. There were conditions on the use and protection of classified information, and on patenting of designs developed as a result of the transfer of such information. Under Article V of the MDA “there will be no transfer by either Party of atomic weapons.” At the time there was concern in the House of Commons that this would imply duplication of effort, since the UK would have to manufacture its own weapons, rather than being able to purchase them from the USA. The Government argued that the XxXxxxx Act did not allow the transfer by the USA of complete atomic weapons nor manufactured nuclear components of such weapons.2
1 Cmnd. 537. It entered into force on 4 August 1958. 2 HC Xxx ...
