Medical Recommendations Clause Samples

The Medical Recommendations clause sets out the obligations and procedures for providing, considering, or acting upon medical advice within the context of the agreement. Typically, it outlines who is responsible for obtaining medical recommendations, how such recommendations should be communicated, and whether compliance with them is mandatory or discretionary. This clause ensures that parties are clear about their roles and responsibilities regarding medical guidance, thereby reducing disputes and promoting the health and safety of individuals involved.
Medical Recommendations. (a) A medical recommendation is a description of an employee’s functional capabilities (i.e. physical or cognitive abilities) which are limited due to a medical condition. Medical recommendations are issued by the Company Health Care Provider based on a review of relevant information, including information from the employee’s community Health Care Provider when available. (b) An employee who may need a new medical recommendation or the removal of a current medical recommendation, shall have the responsibility to report to the nearest Company medical clinic or dispensary and provide the following information, as applicable:
Medical Recommendations. You should consult with your physician or have a physical examination before using any fitness equipment or program, especially if you are elderly, pregnant, unaccustomed to physical exertion, have physical limitations or a history of high blood pressure, heart problems or other chronic illness.
Medical Recommendations. You should consult with your physician or have a physical examination before using any club facilities, equipment or programs, especially if you are elderly, pregnant, unaccustomed to physical exertion, have physical limitations or a history of high blood pressure, heart problems or other chronic illness.

Related to Medical Recommendations

  • Conclusions and Recommendations Based on our country-by-country analysis, 197 of the AEWA populations are already well-monitored both for population size and trend. Our prioritisation method allowed focusing on the AEWA conservation and management priorities (Priorities 1-2) and to consider cost effectiveness and feasibility (Priorities 3-6). Theoretically, the two- third target of the AEWA Strategic Plan can be just attained by focusing on the development of monitoring activities for Priority 1-5 populations (i.e. leaving out the 168 more widespread Priority 6 populations that would require more species-specific monitoring methods. Most of the Priority 1-5 populations would require improvement of the IWC though regional schemes focusing on the West Asian / East African flyway with possibly three subregional components in the Central Asia, Arabia and Eastern and Southern Africa. In the latter region, improvements in Tanzania and Mozambique are particularly important. In the Black Sea - Mediterranean - Sahelian flyway the focus should be primarily on the Sahel countries and especially on increasing the consistency of annual counts. The quality of monitoring is already better in the Black Sea and Mediterranean regions. In the East Atlantic, the ongoing capacity-building activities should continue and the consistency and representativity of site coverage should be further strengthened in most countries. Angola would require a major capacity improvement but primarily for the intra-African migrants on inland wetlands. It is also clear that the targets of the AEWA Strategic Plan cannot be achieved without complementing the IWC with periodic aerial surveys both in Western Africa as well as in Eastern and Southern Africa, by setting up a periodic offshore waterbird monitoring scheme in the Caspian Sea and by focusing in each country on a relatively small number of breeding bird species strategically selected in this report.