Common use of Merit Score Clause in Contracts

Merit Score. Each faculty member shall receive a merit score, as determined by steps 1 and 2 below. Step 1. The following points will be assigned to the evaluation rating categories for each applicable activity category (e.g., teaching, research/scholarship/creative activity, service). Exemplary 2 Above Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 0 Below Satisfactory -1 Unsatisfactory -2 Where research/scholarship/creative activity is not a requirement for a particular classification, the faculty member in that classification will receive a “0” for that activity. Step 2. The merit score for tenured and tenure-earning faulty members is computed by weighting the points for the teaching component by 60%, the research/scholarship/ creative activity component by 30%, and the service component by 10%. The merit score for instructors, lecturers, curators, and librarians is computed by weighting the points for the faculty member’s primary activity category (e.g., teaching for instructors) by 90% and service by 10%. The sum of these weighted scores is the merit score for an individual faculty member. For example, if faculty member Doe received a rating of “exemplary” in teaching, “above satisfactory” in research/scholarship/creative activity, and “below satisfactory” in service, Doe’s merit score would be .60 (1) + .10(-1) = 1.4.

Merit Score. Each faculty member shall receive a merit score, as determined by steps 1 and 2 below. Step 1. The following points will be assigned to the evaluation rating categories for each applicable activity category (e.g., teaching, research/scholarship/creative activity, service). Exemplary 2 Above Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 0 Below Satisfactory -1 Unsatisfactory -2 Where research/scholarship/creative activity is not a requirement for a particular classification, the faculty member in that classification will receive a “0” for that activity. Step 2. The merit score for tenured and tenure-earning faulty faculty members is computed by weighting the points for the teaching component by 60%, the research/scholarship/ scholarship/creative activity component by 30%, and the service component by 10%. The merit score for instructors, lecturers, curators, and librarians is computed by weighting the points for the faculty member’s primary activity category (e.g., teaching for instructors) by 90% and service by 10%. The sum of these weighted scores is the merit score for an individual faculty member. For example, if faculty member Doe received a rating of “exemplary” in teaching, “above satisfactory” in research/scholarship/creative activity, and “below satisfactory” in service, Doe’s merit score would be .60 (1) + .10(-1) = 1.4.

Merit Score. Each faculty member shall receive a merit score, as determined by steps Steps 1 and 2 below.below.13 Step 1. The following points will be assigned to the evaluation rating categories for each applicable activity category (e.g., teaching, research/scholarship/creative activity, service). Exemplary 2 Above Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 0 Below Satisfactory -1 Unsatisfactory -2 Where research/scholarship/creative activity is not a requirement for a particular classificationclassification or the chair indicates ―not applicable‖, the faculty member in that classification will receive a “0” ―0‖ for that activity. Step 2. The merit score for tenured and tenure-earning faulty faculty members is computed by weighting the points for the teaching component by 60%, the research/scholarship/ scholarship/creative activity component by 30%, and the service component by 10%. The merit score for instructors, lecturers, curators, and librarians is computed by weighting the points for the faculty member’s primary activity category (e.g., teaching for instructorsInstructors) by 90% and service by 10%. The sum of these weighted scores is the merit score for an individual faculty member. For example, if faculty member Doe Xxxxxxxxx Xxx received a rating of “exemplary” ―exemplary‖ in teaching, “above satisfactory” in research/scholarship/creative activity, and “below satisfactory” in service, Doe’s merit score would be .60, (1) + .10(-1) = 1.4.

Merit Score. Each faculty member shall receive a merit score, as determined by steps Steps 1 and 2 below. Step 1. The following points will be assigned to the evaluation rating categories for each applicable activity category (e.g., teaching, research/scholarship/creative activity, service). Exemplary 2 Above Satisfactory 1 Satisfactory 0 Below Satisfactory -1 Unsatisfactory -2 Where research/scholarship/creative activity is not a requirement for a particular classification, the faculty member in that classification will receive a “0” for that activity. Step 2. The merit score for tenured and tenure-earning faulty faculty members is computed by weighting the points for the teaching component by 60%, the research/scholarship/ scholarship/creative activity component by 30%, and the service component by 10%. The merit score for instructors, lecturers, curators, and librarians is computed by weighting the points for the faculty member’s primary activity category (e.g., teaching for instructorsInstructors) by 90% and service by 10%. The sum of these weighted scores is the merit score for an individual faculty member. For example, if faculty member Doe received a rating of “exemplary” in teaching, “above satisfactory” in research/scholarship/creative activity, and “below satisfactory” in service, Doe’s merit score would be .60 (1) + .10(-1) = 1.4.