Mitigation Matrix Sample Clauses

Mitigation Matrix. There are no negative impacts associated with the Proposed Action; therefore, there are no mitigation measures. A mitigation matrix is not needed. This page intentionally left blank
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Mitigation Matrix

  • Mitigation Measures Company shall take commercially reasonable measures (except measures causing it to incur out-of-pocket expenses which BNYM does not agree in advance to reimburse) to mitigate losses or potential losses to BNYM, including taking verification, validation and reconciliation measures that are commercially reasonable or standard practice in the Company’s business.

  • Mitigation Executive shall not be required to mitigate the amount of any payment or benefit provided for in this Agreement by seeking other employment or otherwise and there shall be no offset against amounts due Executive under this Agreement on account of any remuneration attributable to any subsequent employment that Executive may obtain.

  • Mitigation Procedures The MCP agrees to coordinate with ODM to determine specific actions that will be required of the Business Associates for mitigation, to the extent practical, of the breach. These actions will include notification to the appropriate individuals, entities, or other authorities. Notification or communication to any media outlet shall be approved, in writing, by ODM prior to any such communication being released. The MCP shall report all of its mitigation activity to ODM and shall preserve all relevant records and evidence.

  • Mitigation of Force Majeure The suspension of a Party’s performance under the Agreement due to a claim of Force Majeure shall be of no greater scope and of no longer duration than is required by the Force Majeure event. A Party suspending performance due to Force Majeure shall take, or cause to be taken, such action as may be necessary to void, or nullify, or otherwise to mitigate, in all material respects, the effects of such event of Force Majeure. The Parties shall take all reasonable steps to resume normal performance under this Agreement after the cessation of any Force Majeure event. If Seller cannot meet the Expected Initial Delivery Date as a result of a Force Majeure event declared by Seller in accordance with Article Two, then Seller shall work diligently to resolve the effect of the Force Majeure and provide evidence of its efforts promptly upon Xxxxx’s written request.

  • Rights Protection Mechanisms and Abuse Mitigation ­‐ Registry Operator commits to implementing and performing the following protections for the TLD:

  • Resource Adequacy Benefits 3.4.1.During the Delivery Term, Seller grants, pledges, assigns and otherwise commits to Buyer all of the Contract Capacity, including Capacity Attributes, if any, from the Project to enable Buyer to meet its Resource Adequacy or successor program requirements, as the CPUC, CAISO or other regional entity may prescribe (“Resource Adequacy Requirements”).

  • Dispute Resolution Mechanisms Registry Operator will comply with the following dispute resolution mechanisms as they may be revised from time to time:

  • Aggravating and Mitigating Factors The penalties in this matter were determined in consideration of all relevant circumstances, including statutory factors as described in CARB’s Enforcement Policy. CARB considered whether the violator came into compliance quickly and cooperated with the investigation; the extent of harm to public health, safety and welfare; nature and persistence of the violation, including the magnitude of the excess emissions; compliance history; preventative efforts taken; innovative nature and the magnitude of the effort required to comply, and the accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of the available test methods; efforts to attain, or provide for, compliance prior to violation; action taken to mitigate the violation; financial burden to the violator; and voluntary disclosure. The penalties are set at levels sufficient to deter violations, to remove any economic benefit or unfair advantage from noncompliance, to obtain swift compliance, and the potential costs, risks, and uncertainty associated with litigation. Penalties in future cases might be smaller or larger depending on the unique circumstances of the case.

  • Mitigating Factors The Contractor had a Trafficking in Persons compliance plan or an awareness program at the time of the violation, was in compliance with the plan, and has taken appropriate remedial actions for the violation, that may include reparation to victims for such violations.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.