Common use of Mitigation of Impacts Clause in Contracts

Mitigation of Impacts. Goal E12: Use an approach to mitigation that emphasizes avoidance of impacts through project design. Strategy E12-1: Adhere to mitigation sequencing🕈. Strategy E12-2: Application of mitigation sequencing should achieve no net loss of ecological functions for each new development and should not result in mitigation in excess of that necessary to assure development will result in no net loss of shoreline ecological functions and will not have a significant adverse impact on other shoreline functions fostered by the policy of the SMA. Strategy E12-3: When compensatory measures are appropriate pursuant to the mitigation sequence above, preferential consideration shall be given to measures that replace impacted functions directly and in the immediate vicinity of the impact. However, alternative compensatory mitigation within the watershed that addresses limiting factors or identified critical needs for shoreline resource conservation based on watershed or comprehensive resource management plans applicable to the area of impact may be authorized. Authorization of compensatory mitigation measures may require safeguards, terms, or conditions to ensure no net loss of ecological functions.

Mitigation of Impacts. Goal E12: Use an approach to mitigation that emphasizes avoidance of impacts through project design. Strategy E12-1: Adhere to mitigation sequencing🕈. Strategy E12-2: Application of mitigation sequencing should achieve no net loss of ecological functions for each new development and should not result in mitigation in excess of that necessary to assure development will result in no net loss of shoreline ecological functions and will not have a significant adverse impact on other shoreline functions fostered by the policy of the SMA. Strategy E12-3: When compensatory measures are appropriate pursuant to the mitigation sequence above, preferential consideration shall be given to measures that replace impacted functions directly and in the immediate vicinity of the impact. However, alternative compensatory mitigation within the watershed that addresses limiting factors or identified critical needs for shoreline resource conservation based on watershed or comprehensive resource management plans applicable to the area of impact may be authorized. Authorization of compensatory mitigation measures may require safeguards, terms, or conditions to ensure no net loss of ecological function. Strategy E12-4: Consistent with LBMC 13-4-9, credits form a certified mitigation bank may be used to compensate unavoidable impactss.

Mitigation of Impacts. Goal E12: Use an approach to mitigation that emphasizes avoidance of impacts through project design. Strategy E12-1: Adhere to mitigation sequencing🕈.sequencing. Strategy E12-2: Application of mitigation sequencing should achieve no net loss of ecological functions for each new development and should not result in mitigation in excess of that necessary to assure development will result in no net loss of shoreline ecological functions and will not have a significant adverse impact on other shoreline functions fostered by the policy of the SMA. Strategy E12-3: When compensatory measures are appropriate pursuant to the mitigation sequence above, preferential consideration shall be given to measures that replace impacted functions directly and in the immediate vicinity of the impact. However, alternative compensatory mitigation within the watershed that addresses limiting factors or identified critical needs for shoreline resource conservation based on watershed or comprehensive resource management plans applicable to the area of impact may be authorized. Authorization of compensatory mitigation measures may require safeguards, terms, or conditions to ensure no net loss of ecological functions.