Mitigation sequence analysis. An applicant required to complete a mitigation sequence analysis pursuant to regulation 6.3(2) must describe how the proposal will follow the below mitigation sequence. Application of the mitigation sequence must achieve no net loss of ecological functions for each new development and not have a significant adverse impact on other shoreline functions fostered by the policy of the Shoreline Management Act. Mitigation measures are listed in descending order of priority. Lower priority measures shall be applied only where higher priority measures are determined to be infeasible or inapplicable. Mitigation in excess of that necessary to ensure that development will result in no net loss of ecological functions will not be required, but may be voluntarily performed.
Appears in 10 contracts
Samples: cdn.townweb.com, cityofelma.com, www.ci.goldendale.wa.us
Mitigation sequence analysis. An applicant required to complete a mitigation sequence analysis pursuant to regulation 6.3(2) must describe how the proposal will follow the below mitigation sequence. Application of the mitigation sequence must achieve no net loss of ecological functions for each new development and not have a significant adverse impact on other shoreline functions fostered by the policy of the Shoreline Management Act. Mitigation measures are listed in descending order of priority. Lower priority measures shall be applied only where higher priority measures are determined to be infeasible or inapplicableinapplicable by a technical analysis or qualified professional. Mitigation in excess of that necessary to ensure that development will result in no net loss of ecological functions will not be required, but may be voluntarily performed.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: fortress.wa.gov