Common use of Name of Respondent Clause in Contracts

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT IDIQ Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECT/WO #: RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100% HUB Participation – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Digitally signed by Presson_J Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments:

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants Xxxxxxx Consultants, Inc. Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT ENV IDIQ Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECT/WO #: 2x2x-0x6x2x-x0x0x0 RFQ #: 0003x0x3x-3x-0x0x3x7x3x8303-00000 1-01119 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal 1 GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100% HUB Participation – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Digitally signed by Presson_J Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: Xxxxxxx Environmental Services, Inc. = 15% Revised 6/2021 Page 2 of 2 Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) - HUB Program EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT’S HUB SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP) 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO N/A respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants Xxxxxxx Engineering, LLC. Name of Project: Geotechnical Geotechinical and CMT IDIQ Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECT/WO #: RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal 1 GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100% HUB Participation Solicitation GFE – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs is compliant to requirement of solicitation process to 3 HUBs, 2 Trade Organizations and allowed 7 working days for all determined scopes a response. (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii20.285(d)(D)(i)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/DateDat : Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Digitally signed by Presson_J Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 -05'00' 01/24/2023 Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? YES ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. Compliance; plans to continue to self-perform - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES ■ NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments:: Revised 6/2021 FC HUB Coordinator

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants Xxxxxxx Xxxxx & Xxxxx-Xxxxxxx Joint Venture Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT IDIQ TBW Program Management Services Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECT/WO #: RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100Meet the Goal Other Services - Respondent has met the 26.0 % Meet the Goal with HUB Participation – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii20.285(d)(1)(D)(iii)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Digitally signed by Presson_J Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: Revised 6/2021 TFC Contract No. 00-000-000 Page 2 of 2 Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) - HUB Program EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT’S HUB SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP) 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO N/A ■ respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A ■ (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants Elite Entrances Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT IDIQ Door, Gate, Loading Dock Leveler Installation, Maint. & Repair Svcs Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECT/WO #: RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: 000-0-00000 IFB #: ■ SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100% HUB Participation Self Performing – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes perform entire contract with own employees, material, supplies and equipment (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii20.285(d)(5)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Digitally signed by Presson_J Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 2021.08.06 10:58:29 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? YES ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES ■ NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: YES ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments:: Revised 6/2021

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants Xxxx X. Xxxxxx, Inc. Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT MEP IDIQ Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECT/WO #:_X2X2-X0X15X-X00X0X RFP #: 3x0x3x-x3x-x0x3x7x1x6 RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal 1 GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100Meet the Goal Professional Services – Respondent has met the 23.7 % Meet the Goal with HUB Participation – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii20.285(d)(1)(D)(iii)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Digitally signed by Presson_J Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO ■ N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: Vendor identified subcontractors as: Fuse Architecture Studio, Inc = 14.7% TSEN = 9% Total = 23.7% Revised 6/2021 Page 2 of 2 Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) - HUB Program EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT’S HUB SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP) 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO N/A respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants Central Texas Refuse Name of Project: Geotechnical Single Stream Pickup, Transportation and CMT IDIQ Recycling Services Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECT/WO #: RFQ #: RFP #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100Meet the Goal Building Construction - Respondent has met the 21.1 % Meet the Goal with HUB Participation – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii20.285(d)(1)(D)(iii)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Digitally signed by Presson_J DateXxxxxx' XxxxxxXxxx: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 -05'002021.11.22 11:50:00 -06'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? YES ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES ■ NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: YES ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: DocuSign Envelope ID: 25FE793D-FB1C-4BFC-B330-20FD1CE0778D TFC Contract No. 00-000-000 - EXHIBIT D 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO N/A ■ respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A ■ (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants XX Xxxx Construction Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT IDIQ Cap-Com Cup&Utility Tunnel-Pkg 3 -Addl Work - GMP 6 Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: 000-0-0000 PROJECT/WO #: 17-008A-8040 RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal GMP#: 6 POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100% HUB Participation Solicitation GFE – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs is compliant to requirement of solicitation process to 3 HUBs, 2 Trade Organizations and allowed 7 working days for all determined scopes a response. (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii20.285(d)(D)(i)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Digitally signed by Presson_J Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 2022.09.20 15:55:21 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved GMP 6 - Addition of scopes to support completion of CapCom -1601 Congress - see attached TFC PM justification email see sub justification for non-solicited scopes GFE docs on file in HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp drive Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: Revised 6/2021 DocuSign EnvelopeTFC ID:ContractED31C009-39F2-40EE-9463-DF43440FD49E18-152-000 Am Page 2 of 2 Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) - HUB Program EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT’S HUB SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP) 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES ■ NO N/A respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A ■ (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants TD Industries Inc Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT IDIQ Plumbing Svcs - TFC Various Buildings Statewide Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: PO #: PROJECTIWO #: RFQ #: RFP #: 000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECT/WO #: RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: ■ SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100% HUB Participation Self Performing – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes perform entire contract with own employees, material, supplies and equipment (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii20.285(d)(5)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Digitally signed by Presson_J Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 2021.07.15 11:13:34 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? YES ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES ■ NO N/A ■ NIA be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: Revised 6/2021 DocuSign Envelope ID: D32B5502-860E-4B0E-BADB-822E3CA47ABC Page 2 of 2 Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) - HUB Program EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT’S HUB SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP) 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO NIA respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO NIA (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants Xxxxx Intertec Corporation Name of Project: Laboratory Testing (Geotechnical and CMT IDIQ CMT) Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECT/WO #: RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal 1 GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100% HUB Participation – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Digitally signed by Presson_J Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 -05'00' 03/22/2023 Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments:

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Engineers, LLC Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT IDIQ Prof MEP Eng & Other Related Prof &Technical Svcs Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECT/WO #: RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100Meet the Goal Professional Services – Respondent has met the 23.7 % Meet the Goal with HUB Participation – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii20.285(d)(1)(D)(iii)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Digitally signed by Presson_J Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 2022.10.28 11:00:44 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO N/A ■ respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A ■ (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Terracon Consultants Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT IDIQ on site for the Cap Com Mall&Garage(on going) Assign7 Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: 000-0-0000 PROJECT/WO #: 00-000-0000 Assignment No. 8 RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: 7 Amendment #: Renewal GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100% HUB Participation Self Performing – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes perform entire contract with own employees, material, supplies and equipment (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii20.285(d)(5)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Digitally signed by Presson_J Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: Revised 6/2021 TFC IDIQ Contract 00-000-000 - Assignment No. 8 - EXHIBIT B Page 2 of 2 Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) - HUB Program EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT’S HUB SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP) 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO N/A respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants HMG and Associates Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT IDIQ Prof MEP Eng & Other Related Prof &Technical Svcs Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECT/WO #: RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100Meet the Goal Professional Services – Respondent has met the 23.7 % Meet the Goal with HUB Participation – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii20.285(d)(1)(D)(iii)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Digitally signed by Presson_J Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 2022.10.28 10:44:46 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO N/A ■ respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A ■ (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants Weston Solutions, Inc. Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT ENV IDIQ Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECT/WO #: RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal 1 GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100% HUB Participation – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Digitally signed by Presson_J Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 -05'00' 02/08/2023 Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached HSP is the approved HSP that reflects this requeston file. - jcp -jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments:

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants The Robins & Xxxxxx Group Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT IDIQ CMR for Permian Basin Behavioral Health Center Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECT/WO #: 00-000-00000 RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100% HUB Participation Self Performing – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes perform entire contract with own employees, material, supplies and equipment (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii20.285(d)(5)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Digitally signed by Presson_J Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? YES ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. Compliance; plans to self-perform - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES ■ NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments:: Revised 6/2021

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants Xxxxx Integrated Systems Name of Project: Geotechnical HVAC Maintenance and CMT IDIQ Repair Services Contract # 00-000-000 0000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECT/WO #: RFQ #: RFP #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100% HUB Participation Self Performing – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes perform entire contract with own employees, material, supplies and equipment (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii20.285(d)(5)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Digitally signed by Presson_J Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 2021.07.30 08:38:23 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? YES ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES ■ NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: YES ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: Revised 6/2021 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1CADE46F-055A-43AD-86A1-ED110EF84D42 Page 2 of 2 Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) - HUB Program EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT’S HUB SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP) 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO N/A ■ respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A ■ (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants Xxxxxxx Management Solutions, Inc Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT IDIQ ManagePath - Leasing Portfolio Database Service Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: 000-0-0000 PROJECT/WO #: RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: ■ SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100% HUB Participation Self Performing – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes perform entire contract with own employees, material, supplies and equipment (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii20.285(d)(5)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Digitally signed by Presson_J Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: Revised 6/2021 TFC IT Contract 00-000-000 Page 2 of 2 Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) - HUB Program EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT’S HUB SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP) 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO N/A respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants Xxxxxxxxx Civil Inc. Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT IDIQ Design-Build Services for Texas Border Infrastructure (TBI) Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECT/WO #: 783383 RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal 1 GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100Meet the Goal Building Construction - Respondent has met the 21.1 % Meet the Goal with HUB Participation – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii20.285(d)(1)(D)(iii)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Digitally signed by Presson_J Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved Amendment to increase contract: The total compensation for HUB Compliance- attached this Agreement is One Hundred Sixty-Two Million, Two Hundred Sixty-Five Thousand and NO/100 ($162,265,000.00) which includes the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Stipulated Sum of Nine Hundred Ninety-Five Thousand and NO/100 Dollars ($995,000.00) for design and preconstruction services for alignment RGV09A-1 and the TFC controlled allowance of One Hundred Sixty-One Million Two Hundred Seventy Thousand and NO/100 Dollars ($161,270,000.00) to be applied at TFC’s sole discretion to DB’s Stipulated Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO ■ N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments:: Revised 6/2021

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants ERC Environmental & Construction Service Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT ENV IDIQ Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000Req.000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECTProject/WO #: 2X2-X0X61X-X00X0X RFQ #: 0003x0303-01-00000 01119 N/A N/A x3x-x3x-x0x3x7x3x9x RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal 1 GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100Meet the Goal Professional Services – Respondent has met the 23.7 % Meet the Goal with HUB Participation – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii20.285(d)(1)(D)(iii)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Digitally signed by Presson_J Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: Abatement/Remediation Services = 10% Laboratory Services = 5% Site Assessments = 10% Revised 6/2021 Page 2 of 2 Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) - HUB Program EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT’S HUB SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP) 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO N/A respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants X. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Jr. & Associates, Inc. (dba Gensler) Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT IDIQ fArchitectural Services Amendment 1 Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: 000-0-0000 PROJECT/WO #: RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal 1 GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100% HUB Participation Self Performing – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes perform entire contract with own employees, material, supplies and equipment (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii20.285(d)(5)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Digitally signed by Presson_J Xxxxx_X Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 -05'002022.12.19 22:32:05 -06'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. Amendment 1 - jcp will continue to self perform until opportunity ($100k) Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments:: Revised 6/2021

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants Xxxxx-Xxxxxxx Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT MEP IDIQ Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECT/WO #:_X2X2-X0X11X-X00X0X RFP #: 3x0x3x-x3x-0x3x7x1x8x RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal 1 GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100% HUB Participation – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Digitally signed by Presson_J Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached HSP is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - on file-jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments:

Name of Respondent. Atlas Technical Consultants X. X. Xxxxxx Construction, LLC Name of Project: Geotechnical and CMT IDIQ CMR Elevator Repair/Replacement at Parking Garages ABFGJ&M Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: PROJECT/WO #: 00-000-0000 RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: 000-0-00000 IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: Amendment #: Renewal GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – 100% HUB Participation Self Performing – Respondent will utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes perform entire contract with own employees, material, supplies and equipment (per TAC Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii20.285(d)(5)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Presson_J Digitally signed by Presson_J Date: 2023.04.04 10:14:38 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: