Optimal MKA Security with FS and Eventual PCS for the Group Manager Sample Clauses

Optimal MKA Security with FS and Eventual PCS for the Group Manager. To obtain security with respect to group manager corruptions, in addition to the security captured by user-mult, we create a new security game mgr-mult, in which we add to the user-mult game an additional oracle mgr-corrupt, which simply returns the secret state of the group manager to the adversary. Observe that there are now more trivial attacks which the adversary can use to win mgr-mult (e.g., corrupting the group manager and then challenging before every user has been updated or removed from the group). We therefore check a new mgr-safe predicate at the end of the game on the queries q1, . . . , qq in order to determine if the execution had any trivial attacks. In addition to that which ∈ user-safe checks for, mgr-safe also checks for every challenge epoch t∗ if the group manager was corrupted in some epoch t < t∗, and there was any ID G[t] that did not have its secrets updated by the group manager (in an operation for which the oob to ID is not corrupted), and was not removed by the group manager, after the corruption, but before t∗. Figure 5 denotes both of these changes. The predicate mgr-safe uses q2e() to additionally return the epoch corresponding to a query to q = mgr-corrupt(). In this case, q2e(q) corresponds to the epoch t that the group manager is in when the query is made (i.e., the epoch defined by the most recent group manager operation create-group, add-user, remove-user, update-user). mgr-mult
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Optimal MKA Security with FS and Eventual PCS for the Group Manager. Now we introduce another security notion for MKA which, in addition to ensuring optimal security for the users, also ensures forward secrecy and eventual PCS for the group manager. If the secret state of the group manager is leaked at some point, all previous group secrets remain hidden from the attacker. Furthermore, once every user has their secrets updated by the group manager or has been removed from the group after her corruption, all future group secrets remain hidden from the attacker. To obtain these properties in addition to those captured by user-mult, we create a new security game mgr-mult, in which we add to the user-mult game an additional oracle mgr-corrupt, which simply returns the secret state of the group manager to the adversary. Observe that there are now more trivial attacks which the adversary can use to win mgr-mult (e.g., corrupting the group manager and then challenging before every user has been updated or removed from the group). We therefore check a new mgr-safe predicate at the end of the game on the queries q1, . . . , qq in order to determine if the execution had any trivial attacks. In addition to that which user-safe checks for, mgr-safe also checks for every challenge epoch t∗ if the group manager was corrupted in some epoch t t∗, and there was any ID G[t] that did not have its secrets updated by the group manager, and was not removed by the group manager, after the corruption, but before t∗. Figure 7 denotes both of these changes. The predicate mgr-safe uses q2e() to additionally return the epoch corresponding to a query to q = mgr-corrupt(). In this case, q2e(q) corresponds to the epoch defined by the most recent group manager operation (create-group, add-user, remove-user, update-user). mgr-corrupt(): return Γsec mgr-safe(q1, . . . , qq ): if ∃(i, j) s.t. qi = mgr-corrupt(), qj = chall(t∗) for some t∗, q2e(qi) ≤ t∗ and ∃IDi ∈ G[q2e(qi)] s.t. $qmi ∈ {update- return 0 return user-safe(q1, . . . , qq ) user(IDi), remove-user(IDi)} s.t. q2e(qi) < q2e(qmi ) ≤ t∗

Related to Optimal MKA Security with FS and Eventual PCS for the Group Manager

  • Procurement from UN Agencies Goods estimated to cost less than $50,000 equivalent per contract may be procured directly from Inter-Agency Procurement Services Agency in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.1 and 3.9 of the Procurement Guidelines.

  • Information and Services Required of the Owner § 3.1.1 The Owner shall provide information with reasonable promptness, regarding requirements for and limitations on the Project, including a written program which shall set forth the Owner’s objectives, constraints, and criteria, including schedule, space requirements and relationships, flexibility and expandability, special equipment, systems, sustainability and site requirements.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Required Procurement Procedures for Obtaining Goods and Services The Grantee shall provide maximum open competition when procuring goods and services related to the grant-assisted project in accordance with Section 287.057, Florida Statutes.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation (c) The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation A. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of its activities under the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Bank. Each such report shall cover the period of one

  • Financial Management System Subrecipient shall establish and maintain a sound financial management system, based upon generally accepted accounting principles. Contractor’s system shall provide fiscal control and accounting procedures that will include the following:

  • Technical Security Controls 35 a. Workstation/Laptop encryption. All workstations and laptops that store PHI COUNTY 36 discloses to CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of 37 COUNTY either directly or temporarily must be encrypted using a FIPS 140-2 certified algorithm which 1 is 128bit or higher, such as AES. The encryption solution must be full disk unless approved by the 2 COUNTY.

  • Financial Institution with a Local Client Base A Financial Institution satisfying the following requirements:

  • Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Capability The wind plant shall provide SCADA capability to transmit data and receive instructions from the ISO and/or the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, as applicable, to protect system reliability. The Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected and the wind plant Developer shall determine what SCADA information is essential for the proposed wind plant, taking into account the size of the plant and its characteristics, location, and importance in maintaining generation resource adequacy and transmission system reliability in its area.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!