We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Figure 5 definition

Figure 5. Percent of adult population (ages 15+) without a financial account by gender, 2017
Figure 5. Infant mortality rate per 1,000 live births: Bulgaria and comparators; 1980-2012 Figure 6: Maternal mortality ratio per 100,000 live births: Bulgaria and comparators; 1990-2010
Figure 5. Conditional inference tree, predicting the empirical log-odds ratios; accuracy with subject-verb agreement in 2SG and 3SG contexts in main clauses with inversion (AdvVS) and without inversion (SVO). HomeLanguage L2Proficiency VerbForm Child Figure 6: Variable importance plot of predictors (random forest); accuracy with subject-verb agreement in 2SG and 3SG contexts in main clauses with inversion (AdvVS) and without inversion (SVO).

Examples of Figure 5 in a sentence

  • The management board of each METRO GROUP company should ensure that a stand- ard tender procedure is pursued before entering into a binding business relationship with a Business Partner.For the tender procedure, an electronic auction system can be used.

  • Upon completion of construction, testing and acceptance of the Big Hill site by Transmission Owner, Developer will convey the fee interest of the property (depicted in DHL Survey Map Drawing No. 07034, attached to this Appendix A as Figure 5) to Transmission Owner by warranty deed and will transfer to Transmission Owner title to the facilities constructed thereon, free and clear of any liens or encumbrances.

  • Figure 5 at the end of this document, shows a typical inverter interconnection.

  • All in all, RWPs participated in government in 14 European countries until 2014.3 Figure 5 shows all European right-wing populist parties in government between 1990 and 2014 that lasted for more than six months (Spittler 2018).

  • With Ro installed, the voltage (U1') between the negative side of the high voltage bus and the electrical chassis is measured (see Figure 5).


More Definitions of Figure 5

Figure 5. Vehicle Licence without Licence Disc and Roadworthy Certificate
Figure 5 antiSMASH report on prediction of gene clusters in the “positive” fosmid clone (indicated as query sequence).
Figure 5. Persistent Poverty Parishes in Louisiana Source: USDA, Economic Research Service, 2015
Figure 5. By using Second Life, users may visit Xxxxxxxx’x pendulum at the OSR area in Ellinogermaniki Agogi’s island and learn about Xxxxxxxx’x experiment, watch related videos as well as observe various images illustrating pendulums around the world.
Figure 5. Human capital and distributional data in the WITCH model, base year (2015)
Figure 5. The SAR scene is tiled into N quadratic non-overlapping tiles S+. µ+ is the mean backscatter value of one tile S+. Each tile S+ is further divided into 4 sub tiles S-. µ- is the mean backscatter value of one sub tile S-.‌ In rare cases, a parent tile intersects with the edge of a SAR scene, which results in dimensions that are smaller than the pre-defined size c². Consequently, these tiles are excluded from the threshold computation ( Figure 6). Furthermore, due to the near-cross polar orbits of Sentinel-1, the along track direction forms an angle of ~10° with respect to the north-south direction, which can result in parent tiles with variable amounts of no-data content. If no-data comprises of > 50 % of the overall data content, the tile is also excluded from the threshold computation ( Figure 6).
Figure 5. Top: Illustration of a ratchet tree and its associated set system t. Vertices contain key-pairs (above) and the associated set (below). Keys already present in the system at time t 1 are depicted in black and keys added by user 5 in round t in blue with shaded background. Edges indicate that knowledge secret key of the source implies knowledge of the one of the sink. Dashed, blue edges correspond to cipher- texts Encpksource (xx xxxx) sent by user 5 in round t, solid edges either to keys derived using a PRF in round t (depicted in blue) or to keys communicated in a previous round (depicted in black). Accordingly, user 5 gen- erated key-pairs (pk 5, sk 5) and (pkd, skd) using fresh randomness, and (pkc, skc) and (pke, ske) using a PRF. Bottom: Depiction of the sets required to exist by property (iii) using the examples S = {1, . . . , 7} = Sk Si and S′ = {5, 6, 7} = Sk′ S′ with k = 4 and k′ = 1 corresponding to the secret keys ske and skd respectively. { } { } { } { } { } We have S0 = 5 = S0′ , S1 = 1, 2 , S2 = 3 , S3 = 4 , and S4 = 6, 7 = S1′ . Note that the number of ciphertexts sent to communicate the secret keys corresponding to S and S′ to their members are 5 > k and 1 = k′ respectively, thus satisfying the inequality on the user’s cost function required by property (iii). - the user u ∈ G performing the update operation, - the round t with 1 ≤ t ≤ tmax, and - the history Mt = (n, k, (Ut′ )1≤t′<t) of sets of users performing updates in the previous rounds. Its output is an integer Cost(u, t, Mt). For better legibility, we will simply write Cost(u, t) whenever the third input is clear from context. Note that while the cost of a user’s update in a given round depends on the operations performed in previous rounds, it does not depend on the sets Ct′ of users corrupted in previous rounds. The latter is justified, since, looking ahead, in the security game in the symbolic model that we aim to capture users are not aware whether they are corrupted or not. However, if they are asked to update by the adversary, they may decide to create particular ciphertexts depending on the the history of operations performed so far as these may have had an impact on their internal state.