Common use of Parachute Payment Limitation Clause in Contracts

Parachute Payment Limitation. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, if it shall be determined that any amount, right or benefit payable by the Company or any other person or entity to or for the Executive’s benefit in connection with the Change in Control, whether pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or otherwise (a “Payment”), would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and if it shall be determined that a reduction of the Payments to a present value that is one dollar less than the minimum present value that would result in the imposition of such excise tax would result in a larger after-tax benefit to Executive than if such reduction had not occurred, then the Payments shall be reduced so as to have a present value that is one dollar less than the minimum present value that would result in the imposition of such excise tax. If the foregoing should result in a reduction in the Payments, the reduction shall be applied first against all cash Payments and then, if necessary, against non-cash Payments in order to satisfy the requirements of this Section 5. All determinations concerning the application of this Section 5 shall be made by a nationally recognized accounting firm to be appointed by the Company. The determinations of the accounting firm shall be conclusive and binding on the parties hereto for all purposes. All fees and expenses of the accounting firm shall be paid by Company.

Appears in 10 contracts

Samples: Change in Control Severance Agreement (Illumina Inc), Change in Control Severance Agreement (Illumina Inc), Change in Control Severance Agreement (Illumina Inc)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.