Participants included in the analyses Sample Clauses

Participants included in the analyses. ‌ Of the total cohort of 706 women enrolled at M0 539 (76.3%) and 495 (70.1%) were followed up to twelve (M12) or 18 months (M18). M12 prediction models-Mental Health. A total of 376 women met the criteria for inclusion into one of the two groups of interest (Stable-Good and Deteriorated Mental Health between M0 and M12): 326 maintained low HADS scores throughout the first year after diagnosis (Stable- Good Mental Health group), while the remaining 50 patients had clinically significant symptomatology at M12 (Deteriorated Mental Health group). Cases who missed two or more measurement waves and patients who displayed substantial fluctuation across the five available measurement waves (e.g., low-high-low-low-high scores or low-low-high-low-high) were not included in any group (n=46; unclassified cases). Among the remaining patients, 60 reported reduced symptoms between M0 and M12, 55 women displayed significant symptoms at both M0 and M12. M12 prediction models-QoL. A total of 270 women met the criteria for inclusion into one of the two groups of interest (Stable-Good and Deteriorated QoL between M0 and M12): 216 maintained high EORTC scores throughout the first year after diagnosis (Stable-Good QoL group), while the remaining 54 patients reported poor QoL at M12 (Deteriorated QoL group). Among the remaining patients, 84 reported improved QoL between M0 and M18, 44 patients reported stable poor QoL, and 51 were unclassified. M18 prediction models-Mental Health. A total of 311 women met the criteria for inclusion into one of the two groups of interest (Stable-Good and Deteriorated Mental Health between M0 and M18): 268 maintained low HADS scores throughout the first 18 months after diagnosis (Stable-Good Mental Health group), while the remaining 43 patients had clinically significant symptomatology at M18 (Deteriorated Mental Health group). Among the remaining patients, 62 reported reduced symptoms between M0 and M18, 56 women displayed significant symptoms at both M0 and M18, and 14 were unclassified. M18 prediction models-QoL. A total of 241 women met the criteria for inclusion into one of the two groups of interest (Stable-Good and Deteriorated QoL between M0 and M18): 182 maintained high EORTC scores throughout the first 18 months diagnosis (Stable-Good QoL group), while the remaining 59 patients rated their QoL as significantly poorer at M18 (Deteriorated QoL group). Among the remaining patients, 84 reported improved QoL between M0 and M18, 29 women disp...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Participants included in the analyses

  • Participation in the SRS 15. Parents who choose not to participate in the SRS are responsible for providing their student with all items that would otherwise be provided by the SRS to enable their student to engage with the curriculum.

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

  • Eligibility for Group Participation This section describes eligibility to participate in the Group Insurance Program.

  • DETERMINATION OF DBE PARTICIPATION A firm must be an eligible DBE and perform a professional or technical function relating to the project. Once a firm is determined to be an eligible DBE, the total amount paid to the DBE for work performed with his/her own forces is counted toward the DBE goal. When a DBE subcontracts part of the work of its contract to another firm, the value of the subcontracted work may be counted toward DBE goals only if the subprovider is itself a DBE. Work that a DBE subcontracts to a non-DBE firm does not count toward DBE goals. A DBE subprovider may subcontract no more than 70% of a federal aid contract. The DBE subprovider shall perform not less than 30% of the value of the contract work with assistance of employees employed and paid directly by the DBE; and equipment owned or rented directly by the DBE. DBE subproviders must perform a commercially useful function required in the contract in order for payments to be credited toward meeting the contract goal. A DBE performs a commercially useful function when it is responsible for executing the work of the contract and is carrying out its responsibilities by actually performing, managing, and supervising the work involved. To perform a commercially useful function, the DBE must also be responsible, with respect to materials and supplies used on the contract, for negotiating price, determining quality and quantity, ordering the material, and installing (where applicable) and paying for the material itself . When a DBE is presumed not to be performing a commercially useful function, the DBE may present evidence to rebut this presumption. A Provider may count toward its DBE goal a portion of the total value of the contract amount paid to a DBE joint venture equal to the distinct, clearly defined portion of the work of the contract performed by the DBE. Proof of payment, such as copies of canceled checks, properly identifying the Department’s contract number or project number may be required to substantiate the payment, as deemed necessary by the Department.

  • Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Participation Pursuant to Education Code section 71028 and Public Contract Code section 10115, the District may have a participation goal for disabled veteran business enterprises (DVBEs) of at least three (3) percent per year of funds expended each year by the District on projects that use funds from the California Community College Chancellor’s Office. This Project may use funds allocated under the Act. Therefore, to the extent feasible and pertaining to future hirings, the Consultant, before it executes the Agreement, shall provide to the District certification of compliance with the procedures for implementation of DVBE contracting goals, appropriate documentation identifying the amount(s) intended to be paid to DVBEs in conjunction with the contract, and documentation demonstrating the Consultant’s good faith efforts to meet these goals.

  • PROFESSIONAL DUES OR FEES AND PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 5.1 Any unit member who is a member of the Association, or who has applied for membership, may sign and deliver to the District an assignment authorizing deduction of unified membership dues, initiation fees, and general assessments of the Association. Pursuant to such authorization, the District shall deduct one-tenth of such dues from the regular salary check of the bargaining unit member each month for ten (10) months. Deductions for bargaining unit members who sign such authorization after the commencement of the school year shall be appropriately pro-rated to complete payments by the end of the school year.

  • Oregon Public Service Retirement Plan Pension Program Members For purposes of this Section 2, “employee” means an employee who is employed by the State on or after August 29, 2003 and who is not eligible to receive benefits under ORS Chapter 238 for service with the State pursuant to Section 2 of Chapter 733, Oregon Laws 2003.

  • Program Participation By participating in the CRF Program, Grantee agrees to:

  • Terms and Conditions Pertaining to Individual Account Service Title Title to Firm Full-Requirements Power Supply will transfer from Competitive Supplier to Participating Customers at the Point of Sale. In accordance with the Distribution Utility's Terms and Conditions for Competitive Suppliers, the Competitive Supplier will be responsible for any and all losses incurred on the local network transmission systems and distribution systems, as determined by the Distribution Utility. Billing and Payment Unless otherwise specified in an Exhibit to this ESA, all billing under this ESA shall be based on the meter readings of each Participating Customer's meter(s) performed by the Distribution Utility. Competitive Supplier shall cause the Distribution Utility to prepare and mail bills to Participating Customers monthly. The Competitive Supplier shall adopt the billing and payment terms offered by the Distribution Utility to its Eligible Customers on Default Service. If actual meter date is unavailable, the Competitive Supplier may cause the Distribution Utility to xxxx based on its good faith estimates of usage. Any overcharge or under-charge will be accounted for in the next billing period for which actual meter data is available. Regional and Local Transmission The prices quoted in Exhibit A do not include current and future charges for distribution service costs collected by the Distribution Utility under its distribution service tariff or local transmission costs as may be imposed by NYISO or individual electric utilities that have FERC transmission tariffs. The Competitive Supplier understands that these costs will be collected by the Distribution Utility. If, in the future, Competitive Supplier becomes responsible for such distribution or transmission costs, Competitive Supplier shall be entitled to collect such costs from Participating Customers to the extent permitted by any Governmental Rules. These costs are "pass through" costs as determined by the appropriate regulatory agencies.

  • Broad Participation Retirement Fund A fund established in The Bahamas to provide retirement, disability, or death benefits, or any combination thereof, to beneficiaries that are current or former employees (or persons designated by such employees) of one or more employers in consideration for services rendered, provided that the fund:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.