Common use of Participation Criteria Clause in Contracts

Participation Criteria. ‌ The Professional Growth Option (PGO) shall be available and voluntary to non-classroom certificated employees who have successfully completed four (4) years of satisfactory summative evaluations (including year prior to entering PGO) with at least two (2) years in Sultan. Participation in and renewal of PGO Plans are contingent upon mutual agreement between the evaluator and the employee. If no agreement can be reached, the employee will be evaluated using the Summative Evaluation System. If a person transfers between schools or job assignment while working on a PGO Plan, continuation is contingent upon mutual agreement between the employee and the administrator. If an evaluator is new to a building, the evaluator is encouraged, but not required, to support the PGO Plans in the building. Extended timelines, adjusted by mutual agreement, will allow existing and new PGO participants to confer and mutually agree upon PGO participation. If an employee is denied participation in the Professional Growth Option, the evaluator shall state the reason(s) for denial on Form E – Interest to Participate. During the PGO period, the participant must continue to demonstrate satisfactory performance in the evaluative criteria required by state statutes and found in the Collective Bargaining Agreement. If the evaluator cannot verify that these criteria are being met, the employee will be removed from the PGO Plan and be placed on the Summative Evaluation System.

Participation Criteria. ‌ The Professional Growth Option (PGO) shall be available and voluntary to non-classroom certificated employees who have successfully completed four (4) years of satisfactory summative evaluations (including year prior to entering PGO) with at least two (2) years in Sultan. Participation in and renewal of PGO Plans are contingent upon mutual agreement between the evaluator and the employee. If no agreement can be reached, the employee will be evaluated using the Summative Evaluation System. If a person transfers between schools or job assignment while working on a PGO Plan, continuation is contingent upon mutual agreement between the employee and the administrator. If an evaluator is new to a building, the evaluator is encouraged, but not required, to support the PGO Plans in the building. Extended timelines, adjusted by mutual agreement, will allow existing and new PGO participants to confer and mutually agree upon PGO participation. If an employee is denied participation in the Professional Growth Option, the evaluator shall state the reason(s) for denial on Form E – Interest to Participate. During the PGO period, the participant must continue to demonstrate satisfactory performance in the seven evaluative criteria required by state statutes and found in the Collective Bargaining Agreement. If the evaluator cannot verify that these criteria are being met, the employee will be removed from the PGO Plan and be placed on the Summative Evaluation System.