Evaluation Criteria. 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)
Evaluation Criteria. The Department shall evaluate eligible responsive bids. Responses that do not meet all requirements of the solicitation or fail to provide all required information, documents, or materials may be rejected as non-responsive. Bidders whose Responses, past performance, or current status do not reflect the capability, integrity, or reliability to fully and in good faith perform the requirements of a Contract may be rejected as non-responsible. The Department reserves the right to determine which Responses meets the requirements, specifications, terms, and conditions of the solicitation, and which Bidders are responsive and responsible.
Evaluation Criteria. Develop, or if a Program Manager is engaged, coordinate for approval by Owner and Using Agency the criteria that will be used to evaluate the short listed candidates for the CM/GC; arrange site visit and interview schedules, and coordinate as necessary to assure a successful interview process.
Evaluation Criteria. The following elements represent the evaluation criteria that will be considered during the evaluation process: MAXIMUM EVALUATION POINTS
A. Responsiveness to the RFP. 1. Requested information included and thoroughness of response. 2. Understanding of the project and ability to deliver as exhibited in the Executive Summary and under Exhibit B. 3. Technical Aspects 20
Evaluation Criteria. Award shall be made to the responsible vendor whose proposal is determined to be the best evaluated offer resulting from negotiations and taking into consideration all aspects of proposal impact items and the Evaluation Criteria as stated in Appendix “B”. • Professional qualifications and experience of vendor and its staff with a minimum of predetermined number of years of relevant experience and demonstrated success in providing the services requested in this solicitation; • Ability to commit resources and turnaround time for services requested; • Pricing; • Experience with other clients of similar size to Xxxxxxx County and government entities; • Vendor’s professional reputation for integrity and compliance with state and federal law, including having the appropriate license to do business in Texas; • Past performance history with Xxxxxxx County (if applicable); • Experience based on references submitted with the vendor’s proposal;and • Overall quality of vendor’s proposal. Submission of a proposal implies the vendor's acceptance of the evaluation criteria and vendor’s recognition that subjective judgments must be made by the Evaluation Committee.
Evaluation Criteria. 12.2.1 Evaluation and assessment of unit members shall include, but not be limited to, consideration of: • California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP’s) • District Continuous Improvement Efforts • School or program improvement “targets” • Unit member annual goals and objectives • Performance of other duties normally required as an adjunct to the regular assignment as prescribed in the Education Code
Evaluation Criteria. 8.1.4.1 Primary criteria used for the ranking of sabbatical applications shall include the merits of the proposal and the benefits of the proposed activity to the faculty member, the department, the University and the profession. Length of service since the previous sabbatical may also be considered. No applicant shall be disadvantaged by their respective academic disciplines. Completeness of the application (See Appendix G) will also be taken into account.
Evaluation Criteria. All employees will be provided the criteria/standards to be used in the evaluation of their job performance. If the criteria/standards for evaluation change, the employee will be so advised. Evaluations shall be based on the job duties assigned and conduct during the evaluation period.
Evaluation Criteria. For the purposes of determining the lowest evaluated bid, facts other than price such as previous performances, inspection of premises, previous experience, financial soundness and such other details as the Procuring Agency at its discretion, may consider appropriate shall be taken into consideration. The following merit point system for weighing evaluation factors/ criteria can be applied for the TECHNICAL PROPOSALS. The number of points allocated to each factor shall be specified in the Evaluation Report. 1 Original receipt for purchase of tender 2 Minimum one year business history from initial date of issuance of DSL 3 Acceptance of terms and condition, tender documents duly signed and stamped
Evaluation Criteria. 9.1 Evaluation of bids will consist of the following:
9.1.1 Total price of contract and other pricing factors that will amount to the best value to the Owners.
9.2 The Owners reserves the right to award contract(s) to more than one Vendor if it is deemed in the best interest of the Owners to do so as to avoid supply shortages and delivery delays.
