Common use of Person-level Weight Clause in Contracts

Person-level Weight. The person-level weight variable (WGTSP13) was constructed as a composite of separate panel specific weights. A positive person-level weight was assigned to all key members of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population for whom MEPS data were collected, representing the corresponding U.S. population in early 2013. For the Panel 18 Round 1 participants, this weight reflects the original household probability of selection for the NHIS, a factor representing the proportion of the 16 NHIS panel-quarter combinations eligible for MEPS, the oversampling of the subgroups described earlier, ratio-adjustment to NHIS national population estimates at the household level, adjustment for non-participation in MEPS at the household or dwelling unit level, and poststratification to U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population estimates obtained from March 2013 CPS data at the family and person levels. For both Panels 17 and 18 separately person-level poststratification reflected population distributions across census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity (Hispanic, Black/non-Hispanic, Asian, other), sex, and age. Finally, a composite weight was assigned to each responding person and a final poststratification was undertaken across the variables of census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity, sex, and age. Table 3-2 shows the number of persons with person weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all persons with person-level weights. In terms of numbers of persons, there are 18,726 for Panel 17, Round 3 and 19,697 for Panel 18, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 38,423 sample persons in the file with positive person-level weights (WGTSP13>0). The corresponding estimate for the civilian, noninstitutionalized population based on summing the weights found in the variable WGTSP13 for these 38,423 persons is 310,197,480. Table 3-2. Persons with a person weight for the 2013 Point-in-Time file Panel 17 Panel 18 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 18,726 19,697 38,423 310,197,480

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Person-level Weight. The person-level weight variable (WGTSP13) was constructed as a composite of separate panel specific weights. A positive person-level weight was assigned to all key members of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population for whom MEPS data were collected, representing the corresponding U.S. population in early 20132014. For the Panel 18 19 Round 1 participants, this weight reflects the original household probability of selection for the NHIS, a factor representing the proportion of the 16 NHIS panel-quarter combinations eligible for MEPS, the oversampling of the subgroups described earlier, ratio-adjustment to NHIS national population estimates at the household level, adjustment for non-participation in MEPS at the household or dwelling unit level, and poststratification to U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population estimates obtained from March 2013 2014 CPS data at the family and person levels. For both Panels 17 18 and 18 19 separately person-level poststratification reflected population distributions across census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity (Hispanic, Black/non-Hispanic, Asian, other), sex, and age. Finally, a composite weight was assigned to each responding person and a final poststratification was undertaken across the variables of census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity, sex, and age. Table 3-2 shows the number of persons with person weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all persons with person-level weights. In terms of numbers of persons, there are 18,726 17,234 for Panel 1718, Round 3 and 19,697 18,700 for Panel 1819, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 38,423 35,934 sample persons in the file with positive person-level weights (WGTSP13>0). The corresponding estimate for the civilian, noninstitutionalized population based on summing the weights found in the variable WGTSP13 for these 38,423 35,934 persons is 310,197,480312,416,305. Table 3-2. Persons with a person weight for the 2013 2014 Point-in-Time file Panel 17 18 Panel 18 19 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 18,726 19,697 38,423 310,197,48017,234 18,700 35,934 312,416,305

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Person-level Weight. The person-level weight variable (WGTSP13) was constructed as a composite of separate panel specific weights. A positive person-level weight was assigned to all key members of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population for whom MEPS data were collected, representing the corresponding U.S. population in early 20132006. For the Panel 18 11 Round 1 participants, this weight reflects the original household probability of selection for the NHIS, a factor representing the proportion of the 16 NHIS panel-quarter combinations eligible for MEPS, the oversampling of the subgroups described earlier, ratio-adjustment to NHIS national population estimates at the household level, adjustment for non-participation in MEPS at the household or dwelling unit level, and poststratification to U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population estimates obtained from March 2013 CPS 2006 Current Population Survey (CPS) data at the family and person levels. For both Panels 17 and 18 separately The person-level poststratification reflected population distributions across census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity (Hispanic, Blackblack/non-Hispanic, Asian, other), sex, and age. Finally, a composite weight was assigned to each responding person and a final poststratification was undertaken across the variables of census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity, sex, and age. Table 3-2 3.2 shows the number of persons with person weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all persons with person-level weights. In terms of numbers of persons, there are 18,726 16,242 for Panel 1710, Round 3 and 19,697 19,357 for Panel 1811, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 38,423 35,599 sample persons in the file with positive person-level weights (WGTSP13>0). The corresponding estimate for the civilian, noninstitutionalized population based on summing the weights found in the variable WGTSP13 for these 38,423 35,599 persons is 310,197,480292,947,439. Table 3-2. 3.2 Persons with a person weight for the 2013 2006 Point-in-Time file Panel 17 10 Panel 18 11 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 18,726 19,697 38,423 310,197,48016,242 19,357 35,599 292,947,439 Beginning with the 2001 Full Year data, MEPS transitioned to 2000 census-based population estimates for poststratification and raking. In addition, MEPS population estimates underwent some “discontinuities” due to adjustments made to the CPS estimates as of 2003 (CPS being the source of the control figures used for raking and poststratification in MEPS). Those who wish to learn about these recent changes in CPS population estimates may consult the report "Revisions to the Current Population Survey Effective in January 2003" from the January 2003 issue of the monthly Labor Review. This report was authored by Xxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx X. Xxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xx Xxxxxxx, and Xxxx Xxxxxxx, all at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Differences in the way racial categories are defined are also noted in this report.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Person-level Weight. The person-level weight variable (WGTSP13) was constructed as a composite of separate panel specific weights. A positive person-level weight was assigned to all key members of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population for whom MEPS data were collected, representing the corresponding U.S. population in early 20132011. For the Panel 18 16 Round 1 participants, this weight reflects the original household probability of selection for the NHIS, a factor representing the proportion of the 16 NHIS panel-quarter combinations eligible for MEPS, the oversampling of the subgroups described earlier, ratio-adjustment to NHIS national population estimates at the household level, adjustment for non-participation in MEPS at the household or dwelling unit level, and poststratification to U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population estimates obtained from March 2013 2011 CPS data at the family and person levels. For both Panels 17 15 and 18 16 separately person-level poststratification reflected population distributions across census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity (Hispanic, Blackblack/non-Hispanic, Asian, other), sex, and age. Finally, a composite weight was assigned to each responding person and a final poststratification was undertaken across the variables of census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity, sex, and age. Table 3-2 shows the number of persons with person weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all persons with person-level weights. In terms of numbers of persons, there are 18,726 15,043 for Panel 1715, Round 3 and 19,697 20,956 for Panel 1816, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 38,423 35,999 sample persons in the file with positive person-level weights (WGTSP13>0). The corresponding estimate for the civilian, noninstitutionalized population based on summing the weights found in the variable WGTSP13 for these 38,423 35,999 persons is 310,197,480305,191,076. Table 3-2. Persons with a person weight for the 2013 2011 Point-in-Time file Panel 17 15 Panel 18 16 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 18,726 19,697 38,423 310,197,48015,043 20,956 35,999 305,191,076 Beginning with the 2001 Full Year data, MEPS transitioned to 2000 census-based population estimates for poststratification and raking. In addition, MEPS population estimates underwent some “discontinuities” due to adjustments made to the CPS estimates as of 2003 (CPS being the source of the control figures used for raking and poststratification in MEPS). Those who wish to learn about these changes in CPS population estimates may consult the report “Revisions to the Current Population Survey Effective in January 2003” from the January 2003 issue of the monthly Labor Review. This report was authored by Xxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx X. Xxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xx Xxxxxxx, and Xxxx Xxxxxxx, all at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Differences in the way racial categories are defined are also noted in this report.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Person-level Weight. The person-level weight variable (WGTSP13) was constructed as a composite of separate panel specific weights. A positive person-level weight was assigned to all key members of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population for whom MEPS data were collected, representing the corresponding U.S. population in early 20132015. For the Panel 18 20 Round 1 participants, this weight reflects the original household probability of selection for the NHIS, a factor representing the proportion of the 16 NHIS panel-quarter combinations eligible for MEPS, the oversampling of the subgroups described earlier, ratio-adjustment to NHIS national population estimates at the household level, adjustment for non-participation in MEPS at the household or dwelling unit level, and poststratification to U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized non-institutionalized population estimates obtained from March 2013 2015 CPS data at the family and person levels. For both Panels 17 19 and 18 20 separately person-level poststratification reflected population distributions across census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity (Hispanic, Black/non-Hispanic, Asian, other), sex, and age. Finally, a composite weight was assigned to each responding person and a final poststratification was undertaken across the variables of census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity, sex, and age. Table 3-2 shows the number of persons with person weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all persons with person-level weights. In terms of numbers of persons, there are 18,726 16,448 for Panel 1719, Round 3 and 19,697 20,562 for Panel 1820, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 38,423 37,010 sample persons in the file with positive person-level weights (WGTSP13>0). The corresponding estimate for the civilian, noninstitutionalized non-institutionalized population based on summing the weights found in the variable WGTSP13 for these 38,423 37,010 persons is 310,197,480315,246,811. Table 3-2. Persons with a person weight for the 2013 2015 Point-in-Time file Panel 17 19 Panel 18 20 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 18,726 19,697 38,423 310,197,48016,448 20,562 37,010 315,246,811

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Person-level Weight. The person-level weight variable (WGTSP13) was constructed as a composite of separate panel specific weights. A positive person-level weight was assigned to all key members of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population for whom MEPS data were collected, representing the corresponding U.S. population in early 20132009. For the Panel 18 14 Round 1 participants, this weight reflects the original household probability of selection for the NHIS, a factor representing the proportion of the 16 NHIS panel-quarter combinations eligible for MEPS, the oversampling of the subgroups described earlier, ratio-adjustment to NHIS national population estimates at the household level, adjustment for non-participation in MEPS at the household or dwelling unit level, and poststratification to U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population estimates obtained from March 2013 2009 CPS data at the family and person levels. For both Panels 17 panels 13 and 18 14 separately person-level poststratification reflected population distributions across census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity (Hispanic, Blackblack/non-Hispanic, Asian, other), sex, and age. Finally, a composite weight was assigned to each responding person and a final poststratification was undertaken across the variables of census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity, sex, and age. Table 3-2 shows the number of persons with person weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all persons with person-level weights. In terms of numbers of persons, there are 18,726 18,779 for Panel 1713, Round 3 and 19,697 19,191 for Panel 1814, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 38,423 37,970 sample persons in the file with positive person-level weights (WGTSP13>0). The corresponding estimate for the civilian, noninstitutionalized population based on summing the weights found in the variable WGTSP13 for these 38,423 37,970 persons is 310,197,480300,544,183. Table 3-2. Persons with a person weight for the 2013 2009 Point-in-Time file Panel 17 13 Panel 18 14 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 18,726 19,697 38,423 310,197,48018,779 19,191 37,970 300,544,183 Beginning with the 2001 Full Year data, MEPS transitioned to 2000 census-based population estimates for poststratification and raking. In addition, MEPS population estimates underwent some “discontinuities” due to adjustments made to the CPS estimates as of 2003 (CPS being the source of the control figures used for raking and poststratification in MEPS). Those who wish to learn about these changes in CPS population estimates may consult the report “Revisions to the Current Population Survey Effective in January 2003” from the January 2003 issue of the monthly Labor Review. This report was authored by Xxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx X. Xxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xx Xxxxxxx, and Xxxx Xxxxxxx, all at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Differences in the way racial categories are defined are also noted in this report.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Person-level Weight. The person-level weight variable (WGTSP13) was constructed as a composite of separate panel specific weights. A positive person-level weight was assigned to all key members of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population for whom MEPS data were collected, representing the corresponding U.S. population in early 20132008. For the Panel 18 13 Round 1 participants, this weight reflects the original household probability of selection for the NHIS, a factor representing the proportion of the 16 NHIS panel-quarter combinations eligible for MEPS, the oversampling of the subgroups described earlier, ratio-adjustment to NHIS national population estimates at the household level, adjustment for non-participation in MEPS at the household or dwelling unit level, and poststratification to U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population estimates obtained from March 2013 2008 CPS data at the family and person levels. For both Panels 17 panels 12 and 18 13 separately person-level poststratification reflected population distributions across census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity (Hispanic, Blackblack/non-Hispanic, Asian, other), sex, and age. (As mentioned above, the initial weight used in the Panel 12, Round 3 weighting incorporated a poststratification of the Panel 12, Round 1 weights to March 2007 CPS population control figures reflecting the 2006 NHIS population distribution on insurance status (private, other) and age (<65, 65+), possible since Panel 12 MEPS respondents are associated with a 2006 NHIS responding household.) Finally, a composite weight was assigned to each responding person and a final poststratification was undertaken across the variables of census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity, sex, and age. Table 3-2 shows the number of persons with person weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all persons with person-level weights. In terms of numbers of persons, there are 18,726 12,917 for Panel 1712, Round 3 and 19,697 20,609 for Panel 1813, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 38,423 33,526 sample persons in the file with positive person-level weights (WGTSP13>0). The corresponding estimate for the civilian, noninstitutionalized population based on summing the weights found in the variable WGTSP13 for these 38,423 33,526 persons is 310,197,480298,215,355. Table 3-2. Persons with a person weight for the 2013 2008 Point-in-Time file Panel 17 12 Panel 18 13 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 18,726 19,697 38,423 310,197,48012,917 20,609 33,526 298,215,355 Beginning with the 2001 Full Year data, MEPS transitioned to 2000 census-based population estimates for poststratification and raking. In addition, MEPS population estimates underwent some “discontinuities” due to adjustments made to the CPS estimates as of 2003 (CPS being the source of the control figures used for raking and poststratification in MEPS). Those who wish to learn about these changes in CPS population estimates may consult the report “Revisions to the Current Population Survey Effective in January 2003” from the January 2003 issue of the monthly Labor Review. This report was authored by Xxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx X. Xxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xx Xxxxxxx, and Xxxx Xxxxxxx, all at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Differences in the way racial categories are defined are also noted in this report.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Person-level Weight. The person-level weight variable (WGTSP13) was constructed as a composite of separate panel specific weights. A positive person-level weight was assigned to all key members of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population for whom MEPS data were collected, representing the corresponding U.S. population in early 20132010. For the Panel 18 15 Round 1 participants, this weight reflects the original household probability of selection for the NHIS, a factor representing the proportion of the 16 NHIS panel-quarter combinations eligible for MEPS, the oversampling of the subgroups described earlier, ratio-adjustment to NHIS national population estimates at the household level, adjustment for non-participation in MEPS at the household or dwelling unit level, and poststratification to U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population estimates obtained from March 2013 2010 CPS data at the family and person levels. For both Panels 17 panels 14 and 18 15 separately person-level poststratification reflected population distributions across census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity (Hispanic, Blackblack/non-Hispanic, Asian, other), sex, and age. Finally, a composite weight was assigned to each responding person and a final poststratification was undertaken across the variables of census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity, sex, and age. Table 3-2 shows the number of persons with person weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all persons with person-level weights. In terms of numbers of persons, there are 18,726 16,725 for Panel 1714, Round 3 and 19,697 17,246 for Panel 1815, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 38,423 33,971 sample persons in the file with positive person-level weights (WGTSP13>0). The corresponding estimate for the civilian, noninstitutionalized population based on summing the weights found in the variable WGTSP13 for these 38,423 33,971 persons is 310,197,480303,343,255. Table 3-2. Persons with a person weight for the 2013 2010 Point-in-Time file Panel 17 14 Panel 18 15 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 18,726 19,697 38,423 310,197,48016,725 17,246 33,971 303,343,255 Beginning with the 2001 Full Year data, MEPS transitioned to 2000 census-based population estimates for poststratification and raking. In addition, MEPS population estimates underwent some “discontinuities” due to adjustments made to the CPS estimates as of 2003 (CPS being the source of the control figures used for raking and poststratification in MEPS). Those who wish to learn about these changes in CPS population estimates may consult the report “Revisions to the Current Population Survey Effective in January 2003” from the January 2003 issue of the monthly Labor Review. This report was authored by Xxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx X. Xxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xx Xxxxxxx, and Xxxx Xxxxxxx, all at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Differences in the way racial categories are defined are also noted in this report.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Person-level Weight. The person-level weight variable (WGTSP13) was constructed as a composite of separate panel specific weights. A positive person-level weight was assigned to all key members of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population for whom MEPS data were collected, representing the corresponding U.S. population in early 20132012. For the Panel 18 17 Round 1 participants, this weight reflects the original household probability of selection for the NHIS, a factor representing the proportion of the 16 NHIS panel-quarter combinations eligible for MEPS, the oversampling of the subgroups described earlier, ratio-adjustment to NHIS national population estimates at the household level, adjustment for non-participation in MEPS at the household or dwelling unit level, and poststratification to U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population estimates obtained from March 2013 2012 CPS data at the family and person levels. For both Panels 16 and 17 and 18 separately person-level poststratification reflected population distributions across census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity (Hispanic, Black/non-Hispanic, Asian, other), sex, and age. Finally, a composite weight was assigned to each responding person and a final poststratification was undertaken across the variables of census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity, sex, and age. Table 3-2 shows the number of persons with person weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all persons with person-level weights. In terms of numbers of persons, there are 18,726 19,091 for Panel 1716, Round 3 and 19,697 20,818 for Panel 1817, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 38,423 39,909 sample persons in the file with positive person-level weights (WGTSP13>0). The corresponding estimate for the civilian, noninstitutionalized population based on summing the weights found in the variable WGTSP13 for these 38,423 39,909 persons is 310,197,480307,891,519. Table 3-2. Persons with a person weight for the 2013 2012 Point-in-Time file Panel 16 Panel 17 Panel 18 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 18,726 19,697 38,423 310,197,48019,091 20,818 39,909 307,891,519 The 2012 Point in Time (PIT) PUF is the first PIT PUF to incorporate 2010 census-based population estimates from the CPS into the poststratification component of PIT weighting. CPS estimates began reflecting 2010 census based data in 2012, and the March 2012 CPS data serves as the basis for the 2011 MEPS weight calibration efforts. An article discussing the impact of this transition on CPS estimates can be found at xxx.xxx.xxx/xxx/xxx00xxx.xxx. Use of the updated population controls will have a noticeable effect on estimated totals for some population subgroups. The article compares some 2011 CPS estimates for those aged 16 and older “as published” with those that would have been generated had the updated population controls been used. Among the more notable increases were for the following subgroups: those aged 55 or older (about 1.3 million more, a 1.7 percent increase); those aged 16-24 (about a half million more, a 1.4 percent increase); Blacks (400 thousand more, a 1.4 percent increase); Hispanics (1.3 million more, a 3.8 percent increase); and Asians (1.2 million more, a 10 percent increase). Corresponding changes can be anticipated for MEPS estimates as a result.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!