Common use of POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES Clause in Contracts

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that the Agreement is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated that the Agreement meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. There are no contested issues in this docket. Staff recommended that the Commission approve the Agreement for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxxxx. Staff also recommended that the Commission require Illinois Bell to file with the Office of the Chief Clerk, within five (5) days from the date upon which the Agreement is approved, a verified statement that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this Docket with the Verified Petition, as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulation.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that the Agreement Amendment is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement Amendment in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated that the Agreement Amendment meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. There are no contested issues in this docket. Staff recommended that the Commission approve the Agreement Amendment for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxxxx. Staff also recommended that the Commission require Illinois Bell to file with the Office of the Chief Clerk, within five (5) days from the date upon which the Agreement Amendment is approved, a verified statement that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement Amendment filed in this Docket with the Verified Petition, as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulation.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that the Agreement is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated that the Agreement meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. There are no contested issues in this docket. Staff recommended that the Commission approve the Agreement for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxxxx. Staff also recommended that the Commission require AT&T Illinois Bell to file with the Office of the Chief Clerk, within five (5) days from the date upon which the Agreement is approved, a verified statement that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this Docket with the Verified Petition, as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulation.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that the Agreement Amendment is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated that the Agreement Amendment meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. There are no contested issues in this docket. Staff recommended that the Commission approve the Agreement Amendment for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxxxx. Staff also recommended that in order to ensure that the Commission require Amendment is in the public interest, SBC Illinois Bell to file with should implement the Office of the Chief ClerkAmendment by filing, within five (5) days from of approval by the date upon which the Agreement is approvedCommission, a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission that the approved Agreement Amendment is the same as the Agreement Amendment filed in this Docket docket with the Verified Petition, as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulationverified petition.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that the Agreement is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated that the Agreement meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. There are no contested issues in this docket. Staff recommended that the Commission approve the Agreement for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxxxx. Staff also recommended that the Commission require Illinois Bell IBTC to file with the Office of the Chief Clerk, within five (5) days from the date upon which the Agreement is approved, a verified statement that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this Docket with the Verified Petition, as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulation.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that the Agreement Amendment is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement Amendment in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx stated that the Agreement Amendment meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. There are no contested issues in this docket. Staff recommended that the Commission approve the Agreement Amendment for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. XxxxxxxXxxxxxxxx. Staff also recommended that the Commission require SBC Illinois Bell to file with the Office of the Chief Clerk, within five (5) days from the date upon which the Agreement Amendment is approved, a verified statement that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement Amendment filed in this Docket with the Verified Petition, as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulation.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that the Agreement Amendment is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement Amendment in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated that the Agreement Amendment meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. There are no contested issues in this docket. Staff recommended that the Commission approve the Agreement Amendment for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxxxx. Staff also recommended that the Commission require SBC Illinois Bell to file with the Office of the Chief Clerk, within five (5) days from the date upon which the Agreement Amendment is approved, a verified statement that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement Amendment filed in this Docket with the Verified Petition, as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulation.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that the Agreement is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated that the Agreement meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. There are no contested issues in this docket. Staff recommended that the Commission approve the Agreement for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxxxx. Staff also recommended that the Commission require Illinois Bell to file with the Office of the Chief Clerk, within five (5) days from the date upon which the Agreement is approved, a verified statement that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this Docket with the Verified Petition, as amended by verified petition. The Chief Clerk should place the Joint Petitioners’ stipulationAgreement on the Commission’s web site under Interconnection Agreements.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that the Agreement Amendment is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement Amendment in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Telecommunications Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience convenience, and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated that the Agreement Amendment meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience convenience, and necessity. There are no contested issues in this docket. Staff recommended that the Commission approve the Agreement Amendment for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxxxx. Staff also recommended that the Commission require Illinois Bell Verizon to file with the Office Chief Clerk of the Chief ClerkCommission, within five (5) days from the date upon which the Agreement Amendment is approved, a verified statement that the approved Agreement Amendment is the same as the Agreement Amendment filed in this Docket docket with the Verified Petition, as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulationpetition.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that the Agreement is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated that the Agreement meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. There are no contested issues in this docket. Staff recommended that the Commission approve the Agreement for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxxxx. Staff also recommended that the Commission require AT&T Illinois Bell to file with the Office of the Chief Clerk, within five (5) days from the date upon which the Agreement is approved, a verified statement that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this Docket with the Verified Petition, as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulation.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that the Agreement Amendment is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement Amendment in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated that the Agreement Amendment meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. There are no contested issues in this docket. Staff recommended that the Commission approve the Agreement Amendment for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxxxx. Staff also recommended that the Commission require AT&T Illinois Bell to file with the Office of the Chief Clerk, within five (5) days from the date upon which the Agreement Amendment is approved, a verified statement that the approved Agreement Amendment is the same as the Agreement Amendment filed in this Docket with the Verified Petition, as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulation.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that the Agreement Amendment is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated that the Agreement meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. There are no contested issues in this docket. Staff recommended that the Commission approve the Agreement for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxxxx. Staff also recommended that in order to ensure that the Commission require Amendment is in the public interest, SBC Illinois Bell to file with should implement the Office of the Chief ClerkAmendment by filing, within five (5) days from of approval by the date upon which the Agreement is approvedCommission, a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission that the approved Agreement Amendment is the same as the Agreement Amendment filed in this Docket docket with the Verified verified Petition, as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulation.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that the Agreement is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated that the Agreement meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. There are no contested issues in this docket. Staff recommended that the Commission approve the Agreement for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxxxx. Staff also recommended that the Commission require Illinois Bell Frontier to file with the Office of the Chief Clerk, within five (5) days from the date upon which the Agreement is approved, a verified statement that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this Docket with the Verified Petition, as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulation.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that the Agreement Amendment is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement Amendment in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated that the Agreement Amendment meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. There are no contested issues in this docket. Staff recommended that the Commission approve the Agreement Amendment for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxxxx. Staff also recommended that the Commission require Illinois Bell Xxxx to file with the Office of the Chief Clerk, within five (5) days from the date upon which the Agreement Amendment is approved, a verified statement that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement Amendment filed in this Docket with the Verified Petition, as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulation.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that the Agreement is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated that the Agreement meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. There are no contested issues in this docket. Staff recommended that the Commission approve the Agreement for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxxxx. Staff also recommended that the Commission require AT&T Illinois Bell to file with the Office of the Chief Clerk, within five (5) days from the date upon which the Agreement is approved, a verified statement that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this Docket docket with the Verified Petition, as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulation.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that the Agreement Amendment is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated that the Agreement meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. There are no contested issues in this docket. Staff recommended that the Commission approve the Agreement for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxxxx. Staff also recommended that in order to ensure that the Commission require Amendment is in the public interest, SBC Illinois Bell to file with should implement the Office of the Chief ClerkAmendment by filing, within five (5) days from of approval by the date upon which the Agreement is approvedCommission, a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission that the approved Agreement Amendment is the same as the Agreement Amendment filed in this Docket docket with the Verified Petition, as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulationverified petition.