Dist Sample Clauses

Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish, 554 U.S. 527 (2008).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (65)
Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish, 554 U.S. 527, 128 S. Ct. 2733 (2008) and further refined by NRG Power Marketing v. Maine Public Utilities Commission, 558 U.S. 165 (2010) (the “Mobile-Sierra” doctrine). The Parties acknowledge that this agreement constitutes a contract rate, and all future proposed changes or challenges will be reviewed pursuant to the public interest application of the just and reasonable standard of review.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (39)
Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish, 000 X.X. 000 (2008).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (19)
Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington, 554 U.S. 527 (2008) and refined in NRG Power Mktg. v.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (19)
Dist. 2 It is recommended that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (19)
Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish, 000 X.X. 000, 128 S. Ct. 2733 (2008).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (17)
Dist. Xx. 0 xx Xxxxxxxxx, 000 X.X. 000 (2008) and further refined in NRG Power Marketing v. Maine Public Utilities Commission, 000 X.X. 000 (2010) ( the “Mobile-Sierra” doctrine). The Parties acknowledge that this agreement constitutes a contract rate, and all future proposed changes or challenges will be reviewed pursuant to the public interest application of the just and reasonable standard of review.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (17)
Dist. 201, 329 Ill.App.3d 1156 (5th Dist. 2002), appeal denied. Adopted: July 17, 2018
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (16)
Dist. Xx. 0 xx Xxxxxxxxx, 000 X.X. 000 (2008).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (15)
Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish, 554 U.S. 527 (2008), and NRG Power Marketing LLC v. Maine Public Utility Commission, 558 U.S. 527 (2010).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (14)