Problem Deficiencies and Justification Clause Samples
Problem Deficiencies and Justification. Some of the issues identified within the proposed project limits are as follows: • The performance measure identified in TAMP for the mainline existing asphalt pavement is, 5.1 miles in fair condition and 0.90 miles in poor condition, see Attachment K. _____ • The 2019 Deflection Study Report (Attachment J) indicates a maximum International Roughness Index (IRI) of 220 inches/mile in the EB direction and 273 inches/mile in the WB direction. As per Highway Design Manual (HDM), the maximum allowable value of IRI that does not require special consideration for design is 170 inches/mile. • The Automated Pavement Condition Survey (APCS) data for year 2016, collected for the most recent surface distresses showed signs of alligator, longitudinal and transverse cracks throughout the project limits. • The average 80th percentile deflection measurements at various test sections along EB and WB traveled way lanes, are greater than the tolerable deflections at the surface (TDS). • Shoulder widths along SR 119 within the project limits are nonstandard. The typical shoulder width is 2’ wide, except at the new subdivisions and new developments. • Pedestrian and bicycling facilities currently exist in segments around new subdivisions/developments only. • Fixed objects such as utility poles, large and small diameter trees are within the CRZ of the highway facility. • There are numerous flooding issues reported by Caltrans Maintenance at several locations along SR 119. Within the community of Pumpkin Center there is severe flooding and standing storm water issues.
Problem Deficiencies and Justification
