Program/Production Reviews. The Production Readiness Review (PRR) will be conducted by the Government to ensure the Contractor has accomplished adequate production planning and preparations to produce LCU and associated components that meet performance requirements in accordance with the contract schedules and without unacceptable risks. During these reviews, the Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, overall comprehensive status of: Production, Procurement and Material Issues Subcontractor and Vendor Procurement Integrated Master Schedule including the Critical Path Make-or-Buy Program Changes Risk Analysis Activities Quality Program Status Defect Reduction Program Status Manufacturing Planning; Manufacturing Schedules; Configuration Management; Quality Assurance; Material Procurement & Supplier Control; Facility and Equipment; Production Processing & Fabrication; Calibration, Tool and Test Equipment; Non-Conforming Material Control Completed Item Inspection and Test; Handling, Storage and Delivery The Contractor shall demonstrate the ability to manufacture and test the LCU and associated components by providing various documents to include, but not be limited to, Manufacturing, Testing, Quality Assurance, Configuration Management, Calibration, and Supplier Management Plans. Policies, procedures, processes & plans demonstrating production processing & fabrication capability, facilities & equipment capacity, production scheduling, manpower resources & training, supplier management, parts & material procurement and shop loading will also be required. On-Site examination of the plans/documents described above, as well as examination of the manufacturing equipment and facility, review of support functions/groups, and interviews with project personnel, are all integral parts of the PRR. Processes must be able to produce repeatable conforming hardware within time constraints of the contract. During the PRR, the Contractor shall be prepared to discuss manufacturing & procurement planning status, issues, problems, risks and schedules associated with the production program, and provide requested supporting objective evidence. A successful review is predicated on the Government’s determination that there are no unacceptable risks, performance & quality requirements are fully met in the production configuration, and production capability demonstrates a satisfactory basis for proceeding into production. The Government in its sole discretion will determine whether the PRRs are successful. The Contractor shall hold quarterly program reviews commencing three (3) months after contract award, and every three months thereafter, which shall cover progress, schedules and problems. These reviews will be used to assess the Contractor’s progress, risk in meeting contractual requirements and status. During these reviews, the Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, overall comprehensive status of: Production, Procurement and Material Issues; Subcontractor and Vendor Procurement; Integrated Master Schedule including the Critical Path; Make-or-Buy Program Changes; Risk Analysis Activities; Quality Program Status; Defect Reduction Program Status; Safety Program Status; Configuration Management Activities; Government Furnished Equipment/Property Status and Issues; Component Procurement Status and Expected Delivery Schedule; Equipment and Data Item Delivery Schedule; Final System Test(s); Cost Saving Initiatives; Other Issues Identified by the Technical POC; The Integrated Master Schedule shall be completed to Tier 1 in accordance with CDRL A006. In the case of any conflict between this SOW and CDRL A006, this SOW takes precedence. Tier 1 is defined as a major subcontractor. For planning purposes, the program review location will be at the Contractor’s facility. The Contractor shall also conduct management meetings regarding delivery on a regular basis (to be mutually agreed upon between the Government and Contractor) between the program reviews. The meetings will be conducted via teleconference or at the Contractor’s facility. Meetings may be held bi-weekly via teleconference; Meeting materials shall be made available 24 hours prior to meeting start and distributed via email; Bi-weekly review shall include updated to schedules for LCU and associated equipment production status with actual start and completion dates for each major step and updated projections with detailed explanation if schedule slips; Bi-weekly review shall include any special topics as mutually agreed upon between the Government and Contractor; The Contractor shall provide presentation material in accordance with CDRL A006. The Government shall reserve and exercise the right to hold additional informal reviews at mutually convenient times to follow progress and problems, which may exist. Attendance at program reviews may include Government personnel, Government support service Contractor personnel, and other Government representatives as appropriate (Contractor personnel are not permitted for all reviews addressing matters pertaining to competitive contracting and actual pricing).
Appears in 2 contracts
Program/Production Reviews. The Production Readiness Review (PRR) will be conducted by the Government to ensure the Contractor has accomplished adequate production planning and preparations to produce LCU and associated components that meet performance requirements in accordance with the contract schedules and without unacceptable risks. During these reviews, the Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, overall comprehensive status of: Production, Procurement and Material Issues Subcontractor and Vendor Procurement Integrated Master Schedule including the Critical Path Make-or-Buy Program Changes Risk Analysis Activities Quality Program Status Defect Reduction Program Status Manufacturing Planning; Manufacturing Schedules; Configuration Management; Quality Assurance; Material Procurement & Supplier Control; Facility and Equipment; Production Processing & Fabrication; Calibration, Tool and Test Equipment; Non-Conforming Material Control Completed Item Inspection and Test; Handling, Storage and Delivery The Contractor shall demonstrate the ability to manufacture and test the LCU and associated components by providing various documents to include, but not be limited to, Manufacturing, Testing, Quality Assurance, Configuration Management, Calibration, and Supplier Management Plans. Policies, procedures, processes & plans demonstrating production processing & fabrication capability, facilities & equipment capacity, production scheduling, manpower resources & training, supplier management, parts & material procurement and shop loading will also be required. On-Site examination of the plans/documents described above, as well as examination of the manufacturing equipment and facility, review of support functions/groups, and interviews with project personnel, are all integral parts of the PRR. Processes must be able to produce repeatable conforming hardware within time constraints of the contract. During the PRR, the Contractor shall be prepared to discuss manufacturing & procurement planning status, issues, problems, risks and schedules associated with the production program, and provide requested supporting objective evidence. A successful review is predicated on the Government’s determination that there are no unacceptable risks, performance & quality requirements are fully met in the production configuration, and production capability demonstrates a satisfactory basis for proceeding into production. The Government in its sole discretion will xxxx determine whether the PRRs are successful. The Contractor shall hold quarterly program reviews commencing three (3) months after contract award, and every three months thereafter, which shall cover progress, schedules and problems. These reviews will be used to assess the Contractor’s progress, risk in meeting contractual requirements and status. During these reviews, the Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, overall comprehensive status of: Production, Procurement and Material Issues; Subcontractor and Vendor Procurement; Integrated Master Schedule including the Critical Path; Make-or-Buy Program Changes; Risk Analysis Activities; Quality Program Status; Defect Reduction Program Status; Safety Program Status; Configuration Management Activities; Government Furnished Equipment/Property Status and Issues; Component Procurement Status and Expected Delivery Schedule; Equipment and Data Item Delivery Schedule; Final System Test(s); Cost Saving Initiatives; Other Issues Identified by the Technical POC; The Integrated Master Schedule shall be completed to Tier 1 in accordance with CDRL A006. In the case of any conflict between this SOW and CDRL A006, this SOW takes precedence. Tier 1 is defined as a major subcontractor. For planning purposes, the program review location will be at the Contractor’s facility. The Contractor shall also conduct management meetings regarding delivery on a regular basis (to be mutually agreed upon between the Government and Contractor) between the program reviews. The meetings will be conducted via teleconference or at the Contractor’s facility. Meetings may be held bi-weekly via teleconference; Meeting materials shall be made available 24 hours prior to meeting start and distributed via email; Bi-weekly review shall include updated to schedules for LCU and associated equipment production status with actual start and completion dates for each major step and updated projections with detailed explanation if schedule slips; Bi-weekly review shall include any special topics as mutually agreed upon between the Government and Contractor; The Contractor shall provide presentation material in accordance with CDRL A006. The Government shall reserve and exercise the right to hold additional informal reviews at mutually convenient times to follow progress and problems, which may exist. Attendance at program reviews may include Government personnel, Government support service Contractor personnel, and other Government representatives as appropriate (Contractor personnel are not permitted for all reviews addressing matters pertaining to competitive contracting and actual pricing).
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract
Program/Production Reviews. The Production Readiness Review (PRR) will be conducted by the Government to ensure the Contractor has accomplished adequate production planning and preparations to produce LCU and associated components that meet performance requirements in accordance with the contract schedules and without unacceptable risks. During these reviews, the Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, overall comprehensive status of: • Production, Procurement and Material Issues • Subcontractor and Vendor Procurement • Integrated Master Schedule including the Critical Path • Make-or-Buy Program Changes • Risk Analysis Activities • Quality Program Status • Defect Reduction Program Status • Manufacturing Planning; • Manufacturing Schedules; • Configuration Management; • Quality Assurance; • Material Procurement & Supplier Control; • Facility and Equipment; • Production Processing & Fabrication; • Calibration, Tool and Test Equipment; • Non-Conforming Material Control • Completed Item Inspection and Test; • Handling, Storage and Delivery The Contractor shall demonstrate the ability to manufacture and test the LCU and associated components by providing various documents to include, but not be limited to, Manufacturing, Testing, Quality Assurance, Configuration Management, Calibration, and Supplier Management Plans. Policies, procedures, processes & plans demonstrating production processing & fabrication capability, facilities & equipment capacity, production scheduling, manpower resources & training, supplier management, parts & material procurement and shop loading will also be required. On-Site examination of the plans/documents described above, as well as examination of the manufacturing equipment and facility, review of support functions/groups, and interviews with project personnel, are all integral parts of the PRR. Processes must be able to produce repeatable conforming hardware within time constraints of the contract. During the PRR, the Contractor shall be prepared to discuss manufacturing & procurement planning status, issues, problems, risks and schedules associated with the production program, and provide requested supporting objective evidence. A successful review is predicated on the Government’s determination that there are no unacceptable risks, performance & quality requirements are fully met in the production configuration, and production capability demonstrates a satisfactory basis for proceeding into production. The Government in its sole discretion will determine whether the PRRs are successful. The Contractor shall hold quarterly program reviews commencing three (3) months after contract award, and every three months thereafter, which shall cover progress, schedules and problems. These reviews will be used to assess the Contractor’s progress, risk in meeting contractual requirements and status. During these reviews, the Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, overall comprehensive status of: • Production, Procurement and Material Issues; • Subcontractor and Vendor Procurement; • Integrated Master Schedule including the Critical Path; • Make-or-Buy Program Changes; • Risk Analysis Activities; • Quality Program Status; • Defect Reduction Program Status; • Safety Program Status; • Configuration Management Activities; • Government Furnished Equipment/Property Status and Issues; • Component Procurement Status and Expected Delivery Schedule; • Equipment and Data Item Delivery Schedule; • Final System Test(s); • Cost Saving Initiatives; • Other Issues Identified by the Technical POC; The Integrated Master Schedule shall be completed to Tier 1 in accordance with CDRL A006. In the case of any conflict between this SOW and CDRL A006, this SOW takes precedence. Tier 1 is defined as a major subcontractor. For planning purposes, the program review location will be at the Contractor’s facility. The Contractor shall also conduct management meetings regarding delivery on a regular basis (to be mutually agreed upon between the Government and Contractor) between the program reviews. The meetings will be conducted via teleconference or at the Contractor’s facility. • Meetings may be held bi-weekly via teleconference; • Meeting materials shall be made available 24 hours prior to meeting start and distributed via email; • Bi-weekly review shall include updated to schedules for LCU and associated equipment production status with actual start and completion dates for each major step and updated projections with detailed explanation if schedule slips; • Bi-weekly review shall include any special topics as mutually agreed upon between the Government and Contractor; The Contractor shall provide presentation material in accordance with CDRL A006. The Government shall reserve and exercise the right to hold additional informal reviews at mutually convenient times to follow progress and problems, which may exist. Attendance at program reviews may include Government personnel, Government support service Contractor personnel, and other Government representatives as appropriate (Contractor personnel are not permitted for all reviews addressing matters pertaining to competitive contracting and actual pricing).
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract
Program/Production Reviews. The Production Readiness Review (PRR) will be conducted by the Government to ensure the Contractor has accomplished adequate production planning and preparations to produce LCU MTP and associated components cables that meet performance requirements in accordance with the contract schedules and without unacceptable risks. During these reviewsPRR, the Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, overall comprehensive status of: Production, Procurement and Material Issues Subcontractor and Vendor Procurement Integrated Master Schedule including the Critical Path Make-or-Buy Program Changes Risk Analysis Activities Quality Program Status Defect Reduction Program Status • Producibility; • Manufacturing Planning; • Manufacturing Schedules; • Configuration Management; • Quality Assurance; • Material Procurement & Supplier Control; • Facility and Equipment; • Production Processing & Fabrication; • Calibration, Tool and Test Equipment; • Non-Conforming Material Control • Completed Item Inspection and Test; • Handling, Storage and Delivery The Contractor shall demonstrate the ability to manufacture and test the LCU MTP and associated components cables by providing various documents to include, but not be limited to, Manufacturing, Testing, Quality Assurance, Configuration Management, Calibration, and Supplier Management Plans. Policies, procedures, processes & plans demonstrating production processing & fabrication capability, facilities & equipment capacity, production scheduling, manpower resources & training, supplier management, parts & material procurement and shop loading will also be required. On-Site examination of the plans/documents described above, as well as examination of the manufacturing equipment and facility, review of support functions/groups, and interviews with project personnel, are all integral parts of the PRR. Processes must be able to produce repeatable conforming hardware within time constraints of the contract. During the PRR, the Contractor shall be prepared to discuss manufacturing & procurement planning status, issues, problems, risks and schedules associated with the production program, and provide requested supporting objective evidence. A successful review is predicated on the Government’s determination that there are no unacceptable risks, performance & quality requirements are fully met in the production configuration, and production capability demonstrates a satisfactory basis for proceeding into production. The Government in its sole discretion will determine whether the PRRs are successful. The Government will provide a report summarizing the proceedings and identifying deficiencies and issues, as applicable. The Contractor shall provide a written response within 30 working days that addresses all identified deficiencies and issues and provides corrective actions. The Contractor shall hold quarterly program reviews commencing three (3) months after contract award, and every three months thereafter, which shall cover progress, schedules and problems. These reviews will be used to assess the Contractor’s progress, risk in meeting contractual requirements and status. During these reviews, the Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, overall comprehensive status of: • Production, Procurement and Material Issues; • Subcontractor and Vendor Procurement; • Integrated Master Schedule including the Critical Path; • Make-or-Buy Program Changes; • Risk Analysis Activities; • Quality Program Status; • Defect Reduction Program Status; • Safety Program Status; • Configuration Management Activities; • Government Furnished Equipment/Property Status and Issues; • Component Procurement Status and Expected Delivery Schedule; • Equipment and Data Item Delivery Schedule; • Final System Test(s); • Cost Saving Initiatives; • Other Issues Identified by the Technical POC; The Integrated Master Schedule shall be completed to Tier 1 in accordance with CDRL A006. In the case of any conflict between this SOW and CDRL A006, this SOW takes precedence. Tier 1 is defined as a major subcontractor. For planning purposes, the program review location will be at the Contractor’s facility. The Contractor shall also conduct management meetings regarding delivery on a regular basis (to be mutually agreed upon between the Government and Contractor) between the program reviews. The meetings will be conducted via teleconference or at the Contractor’s facility. • Meetings may be held bi-weekly via teleconference; • Meeting materials shall be made available 24 hours prior to meeting start and distributed via email; • Bi-weekly review shall include updated to schedules for LCU MTP and associated equipment production status with actual start and completion dates for each major step and updated projections with detailed explanation if schedule slips; • Bi-weekly review shall include any special topics as mutually agreed upon between the Government and Contractor; The Contractor shall provide presentation material in accordance with CDRL A006. The Government shall reserve and exercise the right to hold additional informal reviews at mutually convenient times to follow progress and problems, which may exist. Attendance at program reviews may include Government personnel, Government support service Contractor personnel, and other Government representatives as appropriate (Contractor personnel are not permitted for all reviews addressing matters pertaining to competitive contracting and actual pricing).
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Solicitation, Offer and Award
Program/Production Reviews. The Production Readiness Review (PRR) will be conducted by the Government to ensure the Contractor has accomplished adequate production planning and preparations to produce LCU and associated components that meet performance requirements in accordance with the contract schedules and without unacceptable risks. During these reviews, the Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, overall comprehensive status of: • Production, Procurement and Material Issues • Subcontractor and Vendor Procurement • Integrated Master Schedule including the Critical Path • Make-or-Buy Program Changes • Risk Analysis Activities • Quality Program Status • Defect Reduction Program Status • Manufacturing Planning; • Manufacturing Schedules; • Configuration Management; • Quality Assurance; • Material Procurement & Supplier Control; • Facility and Equipment; • Production Processing & Fabrication; • Calibration, Tool and Test Equipment; • Non-Conforming Material Control • Completed Item Inspection and Test; • Handling, Storage and Delivery The Contractor shall demonstrate the ability to manufacture and test the LCU and associated components by providing various documents to include, but not be limited to, Manufacturing, Testing, Quality Assurance, Configuration Management, Calibration, and Supplier Management Plans. Policies, procedures, processes & plans demonstrating production processing & fabrication capability, facilities & equipment capacity, production scheduling, manpower resources & training, supplier management, parts & material procurement and shop loading will also be required. On-Site examination of the plans/documents described above, as well as examination of the manufacturing equipment and facility, review of support functions/groups, and interviews with project personnel, are all integral parts of the PRR. Processes must be able to produce repeatable conforming hardware within time constraints of the contract. During the PRR, the Contractor shall be prepared to discuss manufacturing & procurement planning status, issues, problems, risks and schedules associated with the production program, and provide requested supporting objective evidence. A successful review is predicated on the Government’s determination that there are no unacceptable risks, performance & quality requirements are fully met in the production configuration, and production capability demonstrates a satisfactory basis for proceeding into production. The Government in its sole discretion will xxxx determine whether the PRRs are successful. The Contractor shall hold quarterly program reviews commencing three (3) months after contract award, and every three months thereafter, which shall cover progress, schedules and problems. These reviews will be used to assess the Contractor’s progress, risk in meeting contractual requirements and status. During these reviews, the Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, overall comprehensive status of: • Production, Procurement and Material Issues; • Subcontractor and Vendor Procurement; • Integrated Master Schedule including the Critical Path; • Make-or-Buy Program Changes; • Risk Analysis Activities; • Quality Program Status; • Defect Reduction Program Status; • Safety Program Status; • Configuration Management Activities; • Government Furnished Equipment/Property Status and Issues; • Component Procurement Status and Expected Delivery Schedule; • Equipment and Data Item Delivery Schedule; • Final System Test(s); • Cost Saving Initiatives; • Other Issues Identified by the Technical POC; The Integrated Master Schedule shall be completed to Tier 1 in accordance with CDRL A006. In the case of any conflict between this SOW and CDRL A006, this SOW takes precedence. Tier 1 is defined as a major subcontractor. For planning purposes, the program review location will be at the Contractor’s facility. The Contractor shall also conduct management meetings regarding delivery on a regular basis (to be mutually agreed upon between the Government and Contractor) between the program reviews. The meetings will be conducted via teleconference or at the Contractor’s facility. • Meetings may be held bi-weekly via teleconference; • Meeting materials shall be made available 24 hours prior to meeting start and distributed via email; • Bi-weekly review shall include updated to schedules for LCU and associated equipment production status with actual start and completion dates for each major step and updated projections with detailed explanation if schedule slips; • Bi-weekly review shall include any special topics as mutually agreed upon between the Government and Contractor; The Contractor shall provide presentation material in accordance with CDRL A006. The Government shall reserve and exercise the right to hold additional informal reviews at mutually convenient times to follow progress and problems, which may exist. Attendance at program reviews may include Government personnel, Government support service Contractor personnel, and other Government representatives as appropriate (Contractor personnel are not permitted for all reviews addressing matters pertaining to competitive contracting and actual pricing).
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract
Program/Production Reviews. The Production Readiness Review (PRR) will be conducted by the Government to ensure the Contractor has accomplished adequate production planning and preparations to produce LCU and associated components cables that meet performance requirements in accordance with the contract schedules and without unacceptable risks. During these reviews, the Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, overall comprehensive status of: • Production, Procurement and Material Issues • Subcontractor and Vendor Procurement • Integrated Master Schedule including the Critical Path • Make-or-Buy Program Changes • Risk Analysis Activities • Quality Program Status • Defect Reduction Program Status • Manufacturing Planning; • Manufacturing Schedules; • Configuration Management; • Quality Assurance; • Material Procurement & Supplier Supplies Control; • Facility and Equipment; • Production Processing & Fabrication; • Calibration, Tool and Test Equipment; • Non-Conforming Material Control • Completed Item Inspection and Test; • Handling, Storage and Delivery The Contractor shall provide production plan to include all pertinent information as called out above. The Contractor shall demonstrate the ability to manufacture and test the LCU and associated components Vertical Launching System cables by providing various documents to include, but not be limited to, Manufacturing, Testing, Quality Assurance, Configuration Management, Calibration, and Supplier Management Plans. Policies, procedures, processes & plans demonstrating production processing & fabrication capability, facilities & equipment capacity, production scheduling, manpower resources & training, supplier management, parts & material procurement and shop loading will also be required. On-Site examination of the plans/documents described above, as well as examination of the manufacturing equipment and facility, review of support functions/groups, and interviews with project personnel, are all integral parts of the PRR. Processes must be able to produce repeatable conforming hardware within time constraints of the contract. During the PRR, the Contractor shall be prepared to discuss manufacturing & procurement planning status, issues, problems, risks and schedules associated with the production program, and provide requested supporting objective evidence. A successful review is predicated on the Government’s determination that there are no unacceptable risks, performance & quality requirements are fully met in the production configuration, and production capability demonstrates a satisfactory basis for proceeding into production. The Government in its sole discretion will determine whether the PRRs are successful. The Contractor shall hold quarterly program reviews commencing three (3) months after contract award, and every three months thereafter, which shall cover progress, schedules and problems. These reviews will be used to assess the Contractor’s progress, risk in meeting contractual requirements and status. During these reviews, the Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, overall comprehensive status of: • Production, Procurement and Material Issues; • Subcontractor and Vendor Procurement; • Integrated Master Schedule including the Critical Path; • Make-or-Buy Program Changes; • Risk Analysis Activities; • Quality Program Status; • Defect Reduction Program Status; • Safety Program Status; • Configuration Management Activities; • Government Furnished Equipment/Property Status and Issues; • Component Procurement Status and Expected Delivery Schedule; • Equipment and Data Item Delivery Schedule; • Final System Test(s); • Cost Saving Initiatives; • Other Issues Identified by the Technical POC; The Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) shall be completed to Tier 1 in accordance with CDRL A006. In the case of any conflict between this SOW and CDRL A006, this SOW takes precedence. Tier 1 is defined as a major subcontractor. For planning purposes, the program review location will be at the Contractor’s facility. The Contractor shall also conduct management meetings regarding delivery on a regular basis (to be mutually agreed upon between the Government and Contractor) between the program reviews. The meetings will be conducted via teleconference or at the Contractor’s facility. • Meetings may be held bi-weekly via teleconference; • Meeting materials shall be made available 24 hours prior to meeting start and distributed via email; • Bi-weekly review shall include updated to schedules for LCU cables and associated equipment production status with actual start and completion dates for each major step and updated projections with detailed explanation if schedule slips; • Bi-weekly review shall include any special topics as mutually agreed upon between the Government and Contractor; The Contractor shall provide presentation material in accordance with CDRL A006. The Government shall reserve and exercise the right to hold additional informal reviews at mutually convenient times to follow progress and problems, which may exist. Attendance at program reviews may include Government personnel, Government support service Contractor personnel, and other Government representatives as appropriate (Contractor personnel are not permitted for all reviews addressing matters pertaining to competitive contracting and actual pricing).
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Contract
