Project Review. A. Programmatic Allowances
1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification.
2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination.
3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review.
4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments.
B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings
Project Review. All plans, specifications, work write-ups, projected cost estimates, punch lists or other means of outlining work on a particular project will be submitted in writing to HCD for review and approval prior to bidding. HCD Construction and Rehabilitation Inspectors will review these items for compliance with new construction and/or rehabilitation standards and materials use.
Project Review. A. Programmatic Allowances
1. If FEMA determines an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification.
2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the appropriate NPS NHL Program Manager from the Southeast Region that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination.
3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct Section 106 review for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C. Standard Project Review.
4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments.
B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings
Project Review. (a) If during the Project a party (Reviewer) forms the reasonable opinion that some aspects of the Project should be varied, then the Reviewer must promptly send the Governance Committee a notice giving details of the basis for its opinion and a proposal as to how the Project (and including the Project Plan if applicable) should be varied (Review Notice).
(b) At the next meeting of the Governance Committee after receiving a Review Notice, or within 10 days after receiving a Review Notice at a specially convened meeting (whichever is the earliest) the Governance Committee will discuss the proposed variations to the Project to address the concerns raised in the Review Notice.
(c) If the Governance Committee agrees to vary the Project, it may:
(i) approve a variation to the Project Plan to implement the Review Notice; or
(ii) if an amendment to the Agreement is required, recommend that each party execute a written variation in accordance with clause 23.6.
(d) Subject to clause 7(c), the parties must continue working in accordance with the unaltered Project Plan and this Agreement.
Project Review. (a) If during the Project a party (Reviewer) forms the reasonable opinion that some aspects of the Project should be varied, then the Reviewer must promptly send the other party (Receiver) a notice giving details of the basis for its opinion and a proposal as to how the Project (and including the Project Plan if applicable) should be varied (Review Notice).
(b) Within 30 days of receiving a Review Notice, if the Receiver is not prepared to accept the Review Notice, the parties must meet and negotiate in good faith variations to the Project Plan to address the concerns raised in the Review Notice.
(c) If the parties agree to vary the Project Plan, they will execute a written variation in accordance with clause 24.6.
(d) If the parties are unable to agree to a variation to the Project Plan then the parties must continue working in accordance with the unaltered Project Plan and this Agreement.
Project Review. A. Exempted Projects
1. Certain projects have no appreciable potential to affect historic properties, whether or not there may be historic properties in the project area. The signatories to this Agreement agree that minor projects limited to the Tier 1 and Tier 2 activities listed in Appendix A will require no further coordination.
2. The SDDOT may add additional activities to the list in Appendix A upon written notice to, consultation with, and concurrence from all signatories to this Agreement.
3. For projects that are limited to the activities listed in Appendix A, SDDOT EPC will document its finding that the action is exempt from further review and maintain that documentation in its project files so the project can be included in the annual report, as described in Stipulation XI.A.1.
B. Standard Review
1. For projects which are not included in Appendix A or for projects in which an exempted activity is part of a larger undertaking or requires material sources, material processing sites, stockpile sites, storage areas, plant sites, or waste sites that are not designated within the project plans, SDDOT EPC shall submit full documentation of the project consistent with 36 C.F.R. § 800.11 to SHPO for a standard review of the project consistent with 36 C.F.R. § 800.
2. When SDDOT EPC submits documentation for a finding of “No Historic Properties Affected” or “No Adverse Effect” to SHPO for consultation, the Review & Compliance Archaeologist shall have ten (10) business days from the receipt of complete information to review the project and concur with or comment on the determination. For projects where SDDOT EPC submits documentation of a finding of “adverse effect,” the Review & Compliance Archaeologist will comment as soon as practical but not to exceed thirty (30) days.
3. For all undertakings requiring the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under NEPA; or for undertakings in which adverse effects to historic properties cannot be avoided, SDDOT’s environmental program staff will notify FHWA, and FHWA will notify the ACHP of the finding of adverse effect and consult with the SHPO and other consulting parties to resolve the adverse effects and conclude the Section 106 process in accordance with 36 C.F.R. § 800.6.
Project Review. It is the responsibility of County to coordinate with the STATE regarding the progress of the Project as defined in the Scope of Work and related attachments. The STATE may request in writing, at its discretion, written progress updates, which the County shall provide to the STATE within 15 calendar days of the STATE’s request.
Project Review. 11.1 The Project will be reviewed by the CRC Executive and Research Advisory Sub- Committee in accordance with the Participants Agreement.
11.2 The Board may, on the recommendation of the CRC Executive or otherwise:
(a) implement variations to the Project; or
(b) terminate the Project, if following a review, the Board reasonably forms the view that the Project will not achieve its objectives, provided the Board acts in accordance with the Participants Agreement.
Project Review. 1.1 The CM shall meet with the OWNER, the Project Designers and any other design team members to fully understand the Program, the design documents, the Project scope and all other pertinent aspects of the Project.
1.2 The CM shall become an integral part of the Project Team that will coordinate the development and progress of the design and construction processes. During the design phase of the project the CM shall work closely with the Owner, the Project Designers and any other design team members to produce a design that meets the Owner’s program, budget and schedule requirements and minimizes changes during construction. The CM shall develop a Construction Management Plan for the Project. In preparing the Construction Management Plan, the CM shall consider the Owner’s schedule, budget, and design requirements. The CM shall then develop various alternatives for the sequencing and management of the Project and shall make recommendations to the Owner. The plan shall address how the CM will implement procedural and administrative aspects of the project during the design, bidding, construction and close-out phases. The Plan shall be presented to the Owner for review at the conclusion of the Pre-Schematic phase. Items to be addressed in the Plan shall include but are not limited to; processes for design review, value engineering, constructability review, cost estimating, approach to General Condtions work, trade contractor pre-qualification, receipt and opening of trade contractor bids, schedule preparation, schedule and budget management, shop drawings, submittals, RFIs,QA/QC during design and construction phases, turnover documentation, LEED requirements, building commissioning and training on building systems. The CM shall conduct a Construction Market Survey to provide current information regarding the availability of local trade contractors, labor, materials and equipment,bidding climate, M/WBE availibility and other economic factors related to the Project. A report of the Construction Market Survey shall be provided to the Owner at the conclusion of the Pre-Schematic phase. Periodic updates to the survey shall be provided if requested by the Owner.
Project Review. The Borrower, MDF and ADB shall undertake Project review twice a year for the first two (2) years of the Project implementation and once a year thereafter. A mid-term review shall be conducted two (2) years after the commencement of the Project implementation. The mid-term review shall include a detailed evaluation of the Project scope, implementation arrangements and progress in achieving scheduled targets and compliance with Loan covenants.
