Project Alternative Development Sample Clauses

Project Alternative Development. The EIS must evaluate reasonable alternatives that could feasibly attain the proposal’s objective and are within a jurisdictional agency’s authority to control. The City has requested that two (2) Action Alternatives and a No Action Alternative be presented to the public in the Scoping Notice. The City requested the following Alternatives: • No Action Alternative • Action Alternatives: o Alternative 1: Funko Field o Alternative 2: ▇▇▇▇▇ s Wall After Scoping is complete, ESA will consult with the City Team to determine if the Alternatives need to be revised or refined. • Draft Description of Alternatives • Final Description of Alternatives • The EIS should include a discussion of the "affected environment" for each of the alternatives (WAC ▇▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇ (6) and WAC ▇▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇ (2)(e)). The elements of the built and natural environment to be discussed are listed in WAC ▇▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇. • There will be no more than two (2) Action Alternatives and a No Action Alternative. • Alternatives to be evaluated in the ▇▇▇▇ will be refined based on scoping comments. • One (1) round of City Team review. • City consolidates all City staff comments prior to submitting to ESA. • The Alternatives will be finalized within three (3) weeks of Notice to Proceed by the City with input from the ESA. • The scope, budget, and/or schedule will be revised accordingly to match the final Alternatives as per City Team instructions.