Project Size Sample Clauses
Project Size. FTM: Nameplate capacity: ________MW BTM: Aggregate nameplate capacity: ________MW
Project Size. The Issuer shall target land parcels of 10-30 acres with an expected development tenure of a maximum of 7 years;
Project Size. One of projects (grant scheme) will be greater than € 2 million. The total allocation of programme totals € 3 million.
Project Size. All projects will be greater than € 2 million, except those for
Project Size. None of projects will be greater than € 2 million due to the fact that the total allocation of programme totals € 2 million.
Project Size. The projects concerning people to people actions (2005/017-453.02.01) and technical assistance (2005/017-453.03.01) will be lower than € 2 million due to the fact that these projects can not utilise such amount of allocation.
Project Size. The Hungarian and Slovak side agreed in the JPD to use for JSPF purposes € 400,000 (€ 200,000 for each country). The Grant Scheme “Development and support of business sites and infrastructure, innovation activities and human resources in border areas” will be supported by the remaining available budget of € 3.6 million (€ 1.8 million for each country).
Project Size. All projects will be greater than €2 million, except those in the following areas:
a) Cross-Border Employment Initiative
b) Water quality management of Arda River
c) Project Preparation Facility for the CBC Bulgaria – Greece
d) People to people where the Bulgarian Ministries concerned cannot utilise as much as €2 million. 1 Taking into consideration the rules set down in the annex of Council Regulation 1266/1999 2 The Practical Guide has replaced section F (“Procurement”) of the DIS Manual
Project Size. The Grant Scheme “Business related Infrastructure Grant Scheme" will be supported by a financial allocation of €3.6 million per country. The minimum/maximum Phare contribution per project will be €100,000 / €300,000 respectively.
Project Size. The market consultation carried out in 2021 indicated a market preference for D&B contracts of a value lower than the values of any one of Projects 2, 3 and 4. While some contractors may consider entering Joint Ventures to bid for these contracts, others would not be likely to do so, and it is expected that this would lead to a reduction in competitive tension. An alternative would be to further sub-divide Projects 2, 3 and 4, however this would be expected to extend the overall programme for construction of these projects and result in cost increases due to reduced economies of scale.