Appears in 57 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

Appears in 50 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Incoming Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the sending institution (in table B) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad. Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. Additional columns can also be added, for example, to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS* credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits. In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits must also be listed in the study programme outlined in table A. When mobility windows are embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B with a single line as described below: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* credits Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the group of components will be included in Table B as follows: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* credits Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10 Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* credits contained in table A if there are no changes to the study programme abroad and the student successfully completes it. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits required for his/her degree and does not need some of the credits gained abroad. Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply if the student does not successfully complete some of the educational components from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should be provided in the Learning Agreement. In all cases, the student will report via the on-line EU survey on the full recognition by the sending institution of his/her credits achieved abroad based on what has been agreed in Table B (or table D in case of changes during the mobility) and its possiblel annexes. The student will commit to reach a certain level of language competence in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in the inter-institutional agreement. In case the student would not already have this level when he/she signs the Learning Agreement, he/she commits to reach it with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the organisational support grant or with the Erasmus+ online tutored courses). All parties must sign the document; however, it is not compulsory to circulate papers with original signatures, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures may be accepted, depending on the national legislation. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added. The section to be completed during the mobility is needed only if changes have to be introduced into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept unchanged and changes should be described in this section. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a group of educational components that will be taken abroad, in the light of the course catalogue that the receiving institution has committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE holder. However, introducing changes might be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable conflicts. Other reasons for a change can be the request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date. These changes to the mobility study programme should be agreed by all parties within four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester). Any party can request changes within the first two to five-week period after regular classes/educational components have started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period following the request. In case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as timely as possible as well. Changes to the study programme abroad should be listed in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution commits to fully recognise the number of ECTS credits as presented in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Only if the changes described in table C affect the group of educational components in the student's degree (table B) that will be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion of the study programme abroad, a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: Revised group of educational components in the student's degree that will be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows and columns can be added as needed to tables C and D. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory and an approval by email may be enough. The procedure has to be decided by the sending institution, depending on the national legislation.

Appears in 17 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the sending institution (in table B) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad. It is necessary to fill in tables A and B thoroughly before the mobility. Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. Additional columns can also be added, for example, to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence (neither in terms of content nor in terms of credits) between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS* ECTS credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits. In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits must also be listed in the study programme outlined in table A. Where all credits in Table A are recognised as forming part of the programme at the sending institution without any further conditions being applied, Table B may be completed with a reference to the mobility window11. When mobility windows are embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B with a single line as described below: Table C Before the mobility Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the ~~sending~~ receiving institution Semester [e.g. autumn / ~~spring] [or~~ spring / term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) for the group of educational components in the student's degree that would normally be completed at the sending institution and which will be replaced by the study abroad Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the group of components will be included in Table B as follows: Table C Before the mobility Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the ~~sending~~ receiving institution Semester [e.g. autumn / ~~spring] [or~~ spring / term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits ~~Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10~~ (or equivalent) for the group of educational components in the student's degree that would normally be completed at the sending institution and which will be replaced by the study abroad Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) contained in table A if there are no changes to the study programme abroad and the student successfully completes it. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits required for his/her degree and does not need some of the credits gained abroad. Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply if the student does not successfully complete some of the educational components from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should be provided in the Learning Agreement. ~~The~~ In all cases, the student will ~~commit to reach a certain~~ report via the on-line EU survey on the full recognition by the sending institution of his/her credits achieved abroad based on what has been agreed in Table B (or table B bis in case of changes during the mobility) and its possible annexes. A recommended level ~~of language competence~~ in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in ~~the~~ their inter-institutional agreement. In The sending HEI is responsible for providing support to its nominated candidates so that they can have the recommended language skills at the start of the study period. For mobility between Programme Countries, and for the languages covered by the Erasmus+ Online Linguistic Support (OLS), the student must carry out the OLS language assessment before and at the end of the mobility period, except for native speakers. The completion of the online assessment before departure is a pre-requisite for the mobility, except in duly justified cases. This assessment will be taken after the student is selected, but before signing the Learning Agreement or, alternatively, the grant agreement, whenever agreed with the sending institution. The OLS has been designed to assist Erasmus+ students in improving their knowledge of the language in which they will study before and during their stay abroad, to ensure a better quality of learning mobility. For all mobilities, in case the level of the student ~~would not already have this level when~~ before the mobility is below the recommended one, the sending HEI and the student commit that he/she ~~signs~~ will reach the ~~Learning Agreement~~recommended level by the start of the mobility, ~~he/she commits to reach it~~ with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the ~~organisational support~~ Organisational Support grant or with the Erasmus+ ~~online tutored~~ OLS language courses, where applicable). The level of language competence that the student already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the study period has to be reported in the Learning Agreement in the box indicated below or, alternatively, in the grant agreement. The student commits to reach this reported level in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of language competence in __________ [the main language of instruction] that the student already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the study period is: A1 □ A2 □ B1 □ B2 □ C1 □ C2 □ Native speaker □ All the students who took the assessment with the Erasmus+ OLS before the mobility will also take a final assessment at the end of the mobility. More opportunities are available with OLS. Please visit xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx All parties must sign the ~~document~~Learning Agreement; however, it is not compulsory to circulate papers with original signatures, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures may be accepted, depending on the national legislation. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added. The section to be completed during the mobility is needed only if changes have to be introduced into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept unchanged and changes should be described in this section. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a group of educational components that will be taken abroad, in the light of the course catalogue that the receiving institution has committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE holder. However, introducing changes might be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable conflicts. Other reasons for a change can be the request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date. These changes to the mobility study programme should be agreed by all parties within four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester). Any party can request changes within the first two to five-week period after regular classes/educational components have started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period following the request. In case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as timely as possible as well. Changes to the study programme abroad should be listed in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution commits to fully recognise the number of ECTS credits as presented in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Only if the changes described in table C affect the group of educational components in the student's degree (table B) that will be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion of the study programme abroad, a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: Revised group of educational components in the student's degree that will be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows and columns can be added as needed to tables C and D. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory and an approval by email may be enough. The procedure has to be decided by the sending institution, depending on the national legislation.

Appears in 15 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

Appears in 9 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the sending institution (in table B) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad. It is necessary to fill in tables A and B thoroughly before the mobility. Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. Additional columns can also be added, for example, to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence (neither in terms of content nor in terms of credits) between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS* ECTS credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits. In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits must also be listed in the study programme outlined in table A. Where all credits in Table A are recognised as forming part of the programme at the sending institution without any further conditions being applied, Table B may be completed with a reference to the mobility window11. When mobility windows are embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B with a single line as described below: Recognition at Sending Institution Table C Before the mobility Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the ~~sending~~ receiving institution Semester [e.g. autumn / ~~spring] [or~~ spring / term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) for the group of educational components in the student's degree that would normally be completed at the sending institution and which will be replaced by the study abroad Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the group of components will be included in Table B as follows: Recognition at Sending Institution Table C Before the mobility Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the ~~sending~~ receiving institution Semester [e.g. autumn / ~~spring] [or~~ spring / term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) for the group of educational components in the student's degree that would normally be completed at the sending institution and which will be replaced by the study abroad Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10 Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) contained in table A if there are no changes to the study programme abroad and the student successfully completes it. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits required for his/her degree and does not need some of the credits gained abroad. Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply if the student does not successfully complete some of the educational components from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should be provided in the Learning Agreement. ~~The~~ In all cases, the student will ~~commit to reach a certain~~ report via the on-line EU survey on the full recognition by the sending institution of his/her credits achieved abroad based on what has been agreed in Table B (or table B bis in case of changes during the mobility) and its possible annexes. A recommended level ~~of language competence~~ in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in ~~the~~ their inter-institutional agreement. In The sending HEI is responsible for providing support to its nominated candidates so that they can have the recommended language skills at the start of the study period. For mobility between Programme Countries, and for the languages covered by the Erasmus+ Online Linguistic Support (OLS), the student must carry out the OLS language assessment before and at the end of the mobility period, except for native speakers. The completion of the online assessment before departure is a pre-requisite for the mobility, except in duly justified cases. This assessment will be taken after the student is selected, but before signing the Learning Agreement or, alternatively, the grant agreement, whenever agreed with the sending institution. The OLS has been designed to assist Erasmus+ students in improving their knowledge of the language in which they will study before and during their stay abroad, to ensure a better quality of learning mobility. For all mobilities, in case the level of the student ~~would not already have this level when~~ before the mobility is below the recommended one, the sending HEI and the student commit that he/she ~~signs~~ will reach the ~~Learning Agreement~~recommended level by the start of the mobility, ~~he/she commits to reach it~~ with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the ~~organisational support~~ Organisational Support grant or with the Erasmus+ ~~online tutored~~ OLS language courses, where applicable). The level of language competence that the student already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the study period has to be reported in the Learning Agreement in the box indicated below or, alternatively, in the grant agreement. The student commits to reach this reported level in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of language competence in __________ [the main language of instruction] that the student already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the study period is: A1 □ A2 □ B1 □ B2 □ C1 □ C2 □ Native speaker □ All the students who took the assessment with the Erasmus+ OLS before the mobility will also take a final assessment at the end of the mobility. More opportunities are available with OLS. Please visit xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx All parties must sign the ~~document~~Learning Agreement; however, it is not compulsory to circulate papers with original signatures, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures may be accepted, depending on the national legislation. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added. The section to be completed during the mobility is needed only if changes have to be introduced into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept unchanged and changes should be described in this section. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a group of educational components that will be taken abroad, in the light of the course catalogue that the receiving institution has committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE holder. However, introducing changes might be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable conflicts. Other reasons for a change can be the request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date. These changes to the mobility study programme should be agreed by all parties within four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester). Any party can request changes within the first two to five-week period after regular classes/educational components have started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period following the request. In case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as timely as possible as well. Changes to the study programme abroad should be listed in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution commits to fully recognise the number of ECTS credits as presented in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Only if the changes described in table C affect the group of educational components in the student's degree (table B) that will be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion of the study programme abroad, a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: Revised group of educational components in the student's degree that will be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows and columns can be added as needed to tables C and D. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory and an approval by email may be enough. The procedure has to be decided by the sending institution, depending on the national legislation.

Appears in 9 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the sending institution (in table B) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad. Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. Additional columns can also be added, for example, to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS* credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits. In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits must also be listed in the study programme outlined in table A. When mobility windows are embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B with a single line as described below: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* credits Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the group of components will be included in Table B as follows: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* credits Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10 Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* credits contained in table A if there are no changes to the study programme abroad and the student successfully completes it. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits required for his/her degree and does not need some of the credits gained abroad. Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply if the student does not successfully complete some of the educational components from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should be provided in the Learning Agreement. In all cases, the student will report via the on-line EU survey on the full recognition by the sending institution of his/her credits achieved abroad based on what has been agreed in Table B (or table D in case of changes during the mobility) and its possible annexes. The student will commit to reach a certain level of language competence in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in the inter-institutional agreement. In case the student would not already have this level when he/she signs the Learning Agreement, he/she commits to reach it with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the organisational support grant or with the Erasmus+ online tutored courses). All parties must sign the document; however, it is not compulsory to circulate papers with original signatures, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures may be accepted, depending on the national legislation. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added. The section to be completed during the mobility is needed only if changes have to be introduced into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept unchanged and changes should be described in this section. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a group of educational components that will be taken abroad, in the light of the course catalogue that the receiving institution has committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE holder. However, introducing changes might be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable conflicts. Other reasons for a change can be the request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date. These changes to the mobility study programme should be agreed by all parties within four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester). Any party can request changes within the first two to five-week period after regular classes/educational components have started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period following the request. In case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as timely as possible as well. Changes to the study programme abroad should be listed in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution commits to fully recognise the number of ECTS credits as presented in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Only if the changes described in table C affect the group of educational components in the student's degree (table B) that will be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion of the study programme abroad, a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: Revised group of educational components in the student's degree that will be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows and columns can be added as needed to tables C and D. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory and an approval by email may be enough. The procedure has to be decided by the sending institution, depending on the national legislation.D.

Appears in 8 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the sending institution (in table B) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad. Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. Additional columns can also be added, for example, to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS* credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits. In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits must also be listed in the study programme outlined in table A. When mobility windows are embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B with a single line as described below: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* credits Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the group of components will be included in Table B as follows: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* credits Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10 Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* credits contained in table A if there are no changes to the study programme abroad and the student successfully completes it. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits required for his/her degree and does not need some of the credits gained abroad. Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply if the student does not successfully complete some of the educational components from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should be provided in the Learning Agreement. In all cases, the student will report via the on-line EU survey on the full recognition by the sending institution of his/her credits achieved abroad based on what has been agreed in Table B (or table D in case of changes during the mobility) and its possible annexes. The student will commit to reach a certain level of language competence in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in the inter-institutional agreement. In case the student would not already have this level when he/she signs the Learning Agreement, he/she commits to reach it with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the organisational support grant or with the Erasmus+ online tutored courses). All parties must sign the document; however, it is not compulsory to circulate papers with original signatures, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures may be accepted, depending on the national legislation. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added. The section to be completed during the mobility is needed only if changes have to be introduced into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept unchanged and changes should be described in this section. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a group of educational components that will be taken abroad, in the light of the course catalogue that the receiving institution has committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE holder. However, introducing changes might be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable conflicts. Other reasons for a change can be the request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date. These changes to the mobility study programme should be agreed by all parties within four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester). Any party can request changes within the first two to five-week period after regular classes/educational components have started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period following the request. In case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as timely as possible as well. Changes to the study programme abroad should be listed in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution commits to fully recognise the number of ECTS credits as presented in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Only if the changes described in table C affect the group of educational components in the student's degree (table B) that will be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion of the study programme abroad, a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: Revised group of educational components in the student's degree that will be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows and columns can be added as needed to tables C and D. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory and an approval by email may be enough. The procedure has to be decided by the sending institution, depending on the national legislation.

Appears in 7 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the sending institution (in table B) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad. It is necessary to fill in tables A and B thoroughly before the mobility. Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. Additional columns can also be added, for example, to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence (neither in terms of content nor in terms of credits) between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS* ECTS credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits. In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits must also be listed in the study programme outlined in table A. Where all credits in Table A are recognised as forming part of the programme at the sending institution without any further conditions being applied, Table B may be completed with a reference to the mobility window12. When mobility windows are embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B with a single line as described below: Table C Before the mobility Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the ~~sending~~ receiving institution Semester [e.g. autumn / ~~spring] [or~~ spring / term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) for the group of educational components in the student's degree that would normally be completed at the sending institution and which will be replaced by the study abroad Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the group of components will be included in Table B as follows: Table C Before the mobility Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the ~~sending~~ receiving institution Semester [e.g. autumn / ~~spring] [or~~ spring / term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits ~~Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10~~ (or equivalent) for the group of educational components in the student's degree that would normally be completed at the sending institution and which will be replaced by the study abroad Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) contained in table A if there are no changes to the study programme abroad and the student successfully completes it. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits required for his/her degree and does not need some of the credits gained abroad. Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply if the student does not successfully complete some of the educational components from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should be provided in the Learning Agreement. ~~The~~ In all cases, the student will ~~commit to reach a certain~~ report via the on-line EU survey on the full recognition by the sending institution of his/her credits achieved abroad based on what has been agreed in Table B (or table B bis in case of changes during the mobility) and its possible annexes. A recommended level ~~of language competence~~ in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in ~~the~~ their inter-institutional agreement. In The sending HEI is responsible for providing support to its nominated candidates so that they can have the recommended language skills at the start of the study period. For mobility between Programme Countries, and for the languages covered by the Erasmus+ Online Linguistic Support (OLS), the student must carry out the OLS language assessment before and at the end of the mobility period, except for native speakers. The completion of the online assessment before departure is a pre-requisite for the mobility, except in duly justified cases. This assessment will be taken after the student is selected, but before signing the Learning Agreement or, alternatively, the grant agreement, whenever agreed with the sending institution. The OLS has been designed to assist Erasmus+ students in improving their knowledge of the language in which they will study before and during their stay abroad, to ensure a better quality of learning mobility. For all mobilities, in case the level of the student ~~would not already have this level when~~ before the mobility is below the recommended one, the sending HEI and the student commit that he/she ~~signs~~ will reach the ~~Learning Agreement~~recommended level by the start of the mobility, ~~he/she commits to reach it~~ with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the ~~organisational support~~ Organisational Support grant or with the Erasmus+ ~~online tutored~~ OLS language courses, where applicable). The level of language competence that the student already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the study period has to be reported in the Learning Agreement in the box indicated below or, alternatively, in the grant agreement. The student commits to reach this reported level in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of language competence in __________ [the main language of instruction] that the student already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the study period is: A1 □ A2 □ B1 □ B2 □ C1 □ C2 □ Native speaker □ All the students who took the assessment with the Erasmus+ OLS before the mobility will also take a final assessment at the end of the mobility. More opportunities are available with OLS. Please visit xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx All parties must sign the ~~document~~Learning Agreement; however, it is not compulsory to circulate papers with original signatures, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures may be accepted, depending on the national legislation. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added. The section to be completed during the mobility is needed only if changes have to be introduced into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept unchanged and changes should be described in this section. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a group of educational components that will be taken abroad, in the light of the course catalogue that the receiving institution has committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE holder. However, introducing changes might be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable conflicts. Other reasons for a change can be the request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date. These changes to the mobility study programme should be agreed by all parties within four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester). Any party can request changes within the first two to five-week period after regular classes/educational components have started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period following the request. In case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as timely as possible as well. Changes to the study programme abroad should be listed in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution commits to fully recognise the number of ECTS credits as presented in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Only if the changes described in table C affect the group of educational components in the student's degree (table B) that will be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion of the study programme abroad, a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: Revised group of educational components in the student's degree that will be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows and columns can be added as needed to tables C and D. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory and an approval by email may be enough. The procedure has to be decided by the sending institution, depending on the national legislation.

Appears in 5 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of and the agreed study programme that the student will carry out ~~abroad~~during his mobility period and which the sending institution commits to give recognition upon successful completion by the student. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the ~~group~~ set of ~~educational~~ components ~~that will~~ to be replaced ~~in his/her degree~~ at sending institution upon successful completion by the ~~sending institution~~ student (in table B~~) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad~~). Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. ~~Additional columns can also be added, for example,~~ The student is recommended to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of take educational components totalling ~~60 ECTS* credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than~~ a ~~full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number~~ minimum of ~~credits~~30 ECTS credits per semester or 15 ECTS credits per trimester. In case the student ~~follows~~ would follow additional educational components ~~beyond those~~ above the required number of ECTS credits needed for his/her degree ~~programme~~curriculum, these additional credits must also be ~~listed~~ contained in the study programme outlined in table A. When there are mobility windows ~~are~~ embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B ~~with a single line as described below~~in the following way: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the ~~group~~ set of components will be included ~~in Table B~~ as follows: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10 Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* ECTS credits contained in table A ~~if there are no changes to the study programme abroad~~ and ~~the student successfully completes it. Any~~ any exception to this rule should be ~~clearly stated~~ documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all ~~parties. Example~~ parties (i.e. in case of ~~justification for non-recognition:~~ additional educational components above the ~~student has already accumulated the~~ required number of ECTS credits ~~required~~ needed for ~~his/her~~ the degree ~~and does not need some of the credits gained abroad~~curriculum). ~~Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the~~ The sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply ~~if the student does not successfully complete~~ in case some ~~of the~~ educational components ~~from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should~~ would not be ~~provided in the Learning Agreement. The student will commit to reach a certain level of language competence in the main language of instruction~~ successfully completed by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in the inter-institutional agreement. In case the student would not already have this level when he/she signs the Learning Agreement, he/she commits to reach it with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the organisational support grant or with the Erasmus+ online tutored courses)student. All parties must sign the document; however, it there is ~~not compulsory~~ no need to circulate papers with original ~~signatures,~~ signatures because scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures ~~may be accepted, depending on the national legislation~~are recognised. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is ~~used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added~~used. The section to be completed during the mobility is only needed ~~only~~ if it is necessary to introduce changes ~~have to be introduced~~ into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept ~~unchanged and~~ unchanged, changes should be described in this ~~section~~section and both parts should remain together in a single document. Requests for extension of the duration of the mobility programme should be made up to one month before the foreseen end date. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a ~~group~~ set of educational components ~~that will~~ to be taken ~~abroad, in~~ abroad and how to recognise them on the light of the course ~~catalogue~~ catalogues that the sending and receiving ~~institution has~~ institutions have committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE ~~holder~~holders. However, introducing changes ~~might~~ may be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable ~~conflicts. Other reasons for~~ conflicts or because the previously selected educational component is not available at receiving institution or it is in a ~~change can be~~ different language than previously specified in the ~~request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date~~course catalogue. These exceptional changes to the mobility study programme should be ~~agreed by all parties~~ made within ~~four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester)~~a month. Any party can request changes within the first ~~two to five~~two-week period after regular classes/educational components have ~~started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes~~started. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period ~~following~~ after the request. In the case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as well as timely as ~~possible as well~~possible. Changes to the study programme abroad should be ~~listed~~ added in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution ~~commits to~~ should fully recognise the number of ECTS credits ~~as presented~~ present in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all ~~parties~~parties as in the section before mobility. Only if the changes described in table C affect the ~~group~~ set of ~~educational~~ components ~~in the student's degree (table B) that will~~ to be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion by the student of the study programme ~~abroad~~abroad (table B), a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: ~~Revised group~~ Exceptional changes to set of ~~educational~~ components ~~in the student's degree that will~~ to be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows ~~and columns~~ can be added as needed to tables C and D. ~~All parties must confirm that~~ For the ~~proposed amendments~~ Programme purposes, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures are recognised as well to issue the Transcript of Records and the Recognition Document. The receiving institution commits to provide the sending institution and the student with a Transcript of Records according to table E and containing all the educational components agreed in the table A (and table C in case there were changes to the ~~Learning Agreement are approved~~study programme abroad). ~~For~~ In addition, grading distribution information should be attached to the Transcript of Records (or a web link where this information can be found) in case it is different or more specific ~~section~~or it has been updated compared to the information provided in the Inter-institutional Agreement. This should be done within a period stipulated in the inter-institutional agreement and normally not longer than five weeks after publication/proclamation of the student’s results at the receiving institution. Following the receipt of the Transcript of Records from the receiving institution, ~~original or scanned signatures are not mandatory~~ the sending institution commits to provide to the student a Recognition Document including table E and ~~an approval by email may be enough~~the completed table F with the recognition outcomes, without further requirements from the student, and within five weeks. The ~~procedure has to be decided~~ sending institution will translate the grades received by the student (when applicable) taking into account the grading distribution information from the receiving institution. In addition, all the educational components will appear as well in the student's Diploma Supplement with also the exact title that they had in the receiving institution. The Recognition Document includes the actual start and end date of the study period, the transcript of records from the receiving institution and the recognition outcomes from the sending institution. The start date of the study period is the first day the student has been present at the receiving institution, ~~depending~~ for example, for the first course, for a welcoming event organised by the host institution or for language and intercultural courses. The end date of the study period is the last day the student has been present at the receiving institution and not his actual date of departure. This is, for example, the end of exams period, courses or mandatory sitting period. The Recognition Document must be issued together with the section before mobility (and the section during mobility if there were changes to the original Learning Agreement) and it can additionally be issued independently. Provide mobility programme Identify responsible persons Page 1 – Information on the ~~national legislation~~student and the sending and receiving institution Additional educational components above the number of ECTS credits required in his/her curriculum are listed in the LA and if the sending institution will not recognise them as counting towards their degree this is agreed by all parties and annexed to the LA Provisions for recognition in case some educational components are not successfully completed are included Pages 1-3 Exceptional changes to mobility programme should be made within one month after the start date of the studies (request for extension of the duration to be made up to one month before the foreseen end date) Modifications ARE needed Modifications are NOT needed A party requests changes in the first two- week period after the start of regular classes/educational components Agreement by email by the three parties within a two-week period after the request Receiving institution provides Transcript of Records to student and sending institution in period stipulated in IIA (normally max. 5 weeks after results). Sending institution provides the Recognition Document to the student within 5 weeks. 1 Nationality: Country to which the person belongs administratively and that issues the ID card and/or passport.

Appears in 5 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

Appears in 5 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

Appears in 4 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of and the agreed study programme that the student will carry out ~~abroad~~during his mobility period and which the sending institution commits to give recognition upon successful completion by the student. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the ~~group~~ set of ~~educational~~ components ~~that will~~ to be replaced ~~in his/her degree~~ at sending institution upon successful completion by the ~~sending institution~~ student (in table B~~) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad~~). Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. ~~Additional columns can also be added, for example,~~ The student is recommended to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of take educational components totalling ~~60 ECTS* credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than~~ a ~~full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number~~ minimum of ~~credits~~30 ECTS credits per semester or 15 ECTS credits per trimester. In case the student ~~follows~~ would follow additional educational components ~~beyond those~~ above the required number of ECTS credits needed for his/her degree ~~programme~~curriculum, these additional credits must also be ~~listed~~ contained in the study programme outlined in table A. When there are mobility windows ~~are~~ embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B ~~with a single line as described below~~in the following way: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the ~~group~~ set of components will be included ~~in Table B~~ as follows: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10 Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* ECTS credits contained in table A ~~if there are no changes to the study programme abroad~~ and ~~the student successfully completes it. Any~~ any exception to this rule should be ~~clearly stated~~ documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all ~~parties. Example~~ parties (i.e. in case of ~~justification for non-recognition:~~ additional educational components above the ~~student has already accumulated the~~ required number of ECTS credits ~~required~~ needed for ~~his/her~~ the degree ~~and does not need some of the credits gained abroad~~curriculum). ~~Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the~~ The sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply ~~if the student does not successfully complete~~ in case some ~~of the~~ educational components ~~from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should~~ would not be ~~provided in the Learning Agreement. The student will commit to reach a certain level of language competence in the main language of instruction~~ successfully completed by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in the inter-institutional agreement. In case the student would not already have this level when he/she signs the Learning Agreement, he/she commits to reach it with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the organisational support grant or with the Erasmus+ online tutored courses)student. All parties must sign the document; however, it there is ~~not compulsory~~ no need to circulate papers with original ~~signatures,~~ signatures because scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures ~~may be accepted, depending on the national legislation~~are recognised. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is ~~used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added~~used. The section to be completed during the mobility is only needed ~~only~~ if it is necessary to introduce changes ~~have to be introduced~~ into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept ~~unchanged and~~ unchanged, changes should be described in this ~~section~~section and both parts should remain together in a single document. Requests for extension of the duration of the mobility programme should be made up to one month before the foreseen end date. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a ~~group~~ set of educational components ~~that will~~ to be taken ~~abroad, in~~ abroad and how to recognise them on the light of the course ~~catalogue~~ catalogues that the sending and receiving ~~institution has~~ institutions have committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE ~~holder~~holders. However, introducing changes ~~might~~ may be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable ~~conflicts. Other reasons for~~ conflicts or because the previously selected educational component is not available at receiving institution or it is in a ~~change can be~~ different language than previously specified in the ~~request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date~~course catalogue. These exceptional changes to the mobility study programme should be ~~agreed by all parties~~ made within ~~four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester)~~a month. Any party can request changes within the first ~~two to five~~two-week period after regular classes/educational components have ~~started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes~~started. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period ~~following~~ after the request. In the case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as well as timely as ~~possible as well~~possible. Changes to the study programme abroad should be ~~listed~~ added in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution ~~commits to~~ should fully recognise the number of ECTS credits ~~as presented~~ present in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all ~~parties~~parties as in the section before mobility. Only if the changes described in table C affect the ~~group~~ set of ~~educational~~ components ~~in the student's degree (table B) that will~~ to be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion by the student of the study programme ~~abroad~~abroad (table B), a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: ~~Revised group~~ Exceptional changes to set of ~~educational~~ components ~~in the student's degree that will~~ to be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows ~~and columns~~ can be added as needed to tables C and D. ~~All parties must confirm that~~ For the ~~proposed amendments~~ Programme purposes, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures are recognised as well to issue the Transcript of Records and the Recognition Document. The receiving institution commits to provide the sending institution and the student with a Transcript of Records according to table E and containing all the educational components agreed in the table A (and table C in case there were changes to the ~~Learning Agreement are approved~~study programme abroad). ~~For~~ In addition, grading distribution information should be attached to the Transcript of Records (or a web link where this information can be found) in case it is different or more specific ~~section~~or it has been updated compared to the information provided in the Inter-institutional Agreement. This should be done within a period stipulated in the inter-institutional agreement and normally not longer than five weeks after publication/proclamation of the student’s results at the receiving institution. Following the receipt of the Transcript of Records from the receiving institution, ~~original or scanned signatures are not mandatory~~ the sending institution commits to provide to the student a Recognition Document including table E and ~~an approval by email may be enough~~the completed table F with the recognition outcomes, without further requirements from the student, and within five weeks. The ~~procedure has to be decided~~ sending institution will translate the grades received by the student (when applicable) taking into account the grading distribution information from the receiving institution. In addition, all the educational components will appear as well in the student's Diploma Supplement with also the exact title that they had in the receiving institution. The Recognition Document includes the actual start and end date of the study period, the transcript of records from the receiving institution and the recognition outcomes from the sending institution. The start date of the study period is the first day the student has been present at the receiving institution, ~~depending~~ for example, for the first course, for a welcoming event organised by the host institution or for language and intercultural courses. The end date of the study period is the last day the student has been present at the receiving institution and not his actual date of departure. This is, for example, the end of exams period, courses or mandatory sitting period. The Recognition Document must be issued together with the section before mobility (and the section during mobility if there were changes to the original Learning Agreement) and it can additionally be issued independently. Provisions for recognition in case some educational components are not successfully completed are included Provide mobility programme Identify responsible persons Commitment of the three parties with original / scanned/ digital signatures. Additional educational components above the number of ECTS credits required in his/her curriculum are listed in the LA and if the sending institution will not recognise them as counting towards their degree this is agreed by all parties and annexed to the LA Page 1 – Information on the ~~national legislation~~student and the sending and receiving institution Modifications are NOT needed Modifications ARE needed Receiving institution provides Transcript of Records to student and sending institution in period stipulated in IIA (normally max. 5 weeks after results). Sending institution provides the Recognition Document to the student within 5 weeks. 1 Nationality: Country to which the person belongs administratively and that issues the ID card and/or passport.

Appears in 4 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

Appears in 4 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the sending institution (in table B) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad. It is necessary to fill in tables A and B thoroughly before the mobility. Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. Additional columns can also be added, for example, to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence (neither in terms of content nor in terms of credits) between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS* ECTS credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits. In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits must also be listed in the study programme outlined in table A. Where all credits in Table A are recognised as forming part of the programme at the sending institution without any further conditions being applied, Table B may be completed with a reference to the mobility window13. When mobility windows are embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B with a single line as described below: Table C Before the mobility Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the ~~sending~~ receiving institution Semester [e.g. autumn / ~~spring] [or~~ spring / term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) for the group of educational components in the student's degree that would normally be completed at the sending institution and which will be replaced by the study abroad Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the group of components will be included in Table B as follows: Table C Before the mobility Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the ~~sending~~ receiving institution Semester [e.g. autumn / ~~spring] [or~~ spring / term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits ~~Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10~~ (or equivalent) for the group of educational components in the student's degree that would normally be completed at the sending institution and which will be replaced by the study abroad Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) contained in table A if there are no changes to the study programme abroad and the student successfully completes it. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits required for his/her degree and does not need some of the credits gained abroad. Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply if the student does not successfully complete some of the educational components from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should be provided in the Learning Agreement. ~~The~~ In all cases, the student will ~~commit to reach a certain~~ report via the on-line EU survey on the full recognition by the sending institution of his/her credits achieved abroad based on what has been agreed in Table B (or table B bis in case of changes during the mobility) and its possible annexes. A recommended level ~~of language competence~~ in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in ~~the~~ their inter-institutional agreement. In The sending HEI is responsible for providing support to its nominated candidates so that they can have the recommended language skills at the start of the study period. For mobility between Programme Countries, and for the languages covered by the Erasmus+ Online Linguistic Support (OLS), the student must carry out the OLS language assessment before and at the end of the mobility period, except for native speakers. The completion of the online assessment before departure is a pre-requisite for the mobility, except in duly justified cases. This assessment will be taken after the student is selected, but before signing the Learning Agreement or, alternatively, the grant agreement, whenever agreed with the sending institution. The OLS has been designed to assist Erasmus+ students in improving their knowledge of the language in which they will study before and during their stay abroad, to ensure a better quality of learning mobility. For all mobilities, in case the level of the student ~~would not already have this level when~~ before the mobility is below the recommended one, the sending HEI and the student commit that he/she ~~signs~~ will reach the ~~Learning Agreement~~recommended level by the start of the mobility, ~~he/she commits to reach it~~ with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the ~~organisational support~~ Organisational Support grant or with the Erasmus+ ~~online tutored~~ OLS language courses, where applicable). The level of language competence that the student already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the study period has to be reported in the Learning Agreement in the box indicated below or, alternatively, in the grant agreement. The student commits to reach this reported level in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of language competence in __________ [the main language of instruction] that the student already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the study period is: A1 □ A2 □ B1 □ B2 □ C1 □ C2 □ Native speaker □ All the students who took the assessment with the Erasmus+ OLS before the mobility will also take a final assessment at the end of the mobility. More opportunities are available with OLS. Please visit xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx All parties must sign the ~~document~~Learning Agreement; however, it is not compulsory to circulate papers with original signatures, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures may be accepted, depending on the national legislation. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added. The section to be completed during the mobility is needed only if changes have to be introduced into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept unchanged and changes should be described in this section. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a group of educational components that will be taken abroad, in the light of the course catalogue that the receiving institution has committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE holder. However, introducing changes might be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable conflicts. Other reasons for a change can be the request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date. These changes to the mobility study programme should be agreed by all parties within four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester). Any party can request changes within the first two to five-week period after regular classes/educational components have started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period following the request. In case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as timely as possible as well. Changes to the study programme abroad should be listed in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution commits to fully recognise the number of ECTS credits as presented in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Only if the changes described in table C affect the group of educational components in the student's degree (table B) that will be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion of the study programme abroad, a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: Revised group of educational components in the student's degree that will be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows and columns can be added as needed to tables C and D. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory and an approval by email may be enough. The procedure has to be decided by the sending institution, depending on the national legislation.

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Student Mobility Learning Agreement, Learning Agreement for Studies

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the sending institution (in table B) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad. Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. Additional columns can also be added, for example, to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS* credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits. In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits must also be listed in the study programme outlined in table A. When mobility windows are embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B with a single line as described below: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* credits Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the group of components will be included in Table B as follows: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* credits Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10 Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* credits contained in table A if there are no changes to the study programme abroad and the student successfully completes it. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits required for his/her degree and does not need some of the credits gained abroad. Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply if the student does not successfully complete some of the educational components from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should be provided in the Learning Agreement. In all cases, the student will report via the on-line EU survey on the full recognition by the sending institution of his/her credits achieved abroad based on what has been agreed in Table B (or table D in case of changes during the mobility) and its possible annexes. The student will commit to reach a certain level of language competence in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in the inter-institutional agreement. In case the student would not already have this level when he/she signs the Learning Agreement, he/she commits to reach it with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the organisational support grant or with the Erasmus+ online tutored courses). All parties must sign the document; however, it is not compulsory to circulate papers with original signatures, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures may be accepted, depending on the national legislation. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added. The section to be completed during the mobility is needed only if changes have to be introduced into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept unchanged and changes should be described in this section. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a group of educational components that will be taken abroad, in the light of the course catalogue that the receiving institution has committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE holder. However, introducing changes might be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable conflicts. Other reasons for a change can be the request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date. These changes to the mobility study programme should be agreed by all parties within four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester). Any party can request changes within the first two to five-week period after regular classes/educational components have started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period following the request. In case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as timely as possible as well. Changes to the study programme abroad should be listed in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution commits to fully recognise the number of ECTS credits as presented in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Only if the changes described in table C affect the group of educational components in the student's degree (table B) that will be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion of the study programme abroad, a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: Revised group of educational components in the student's degree that will be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows and columns can be added as needed to tables C and D. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory and an approval by email may be enough. The procedure has to be decided by the sending institution, depending on the national legislation.

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the sending institution (in table B) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad. Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. Additional columns can also be added, for example, to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS* credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits. In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits must also be listed in the study programme outlined in table A. When mobility windows are embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B with a single line as described below: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* credits Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the group of components will be included in Table B as follows: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* credits Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10 Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* credits contained in table A if there are no changes to the study programme abroad and the student successfully completes it. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits required for his/her degree and does not need some of the credits gained abroad. Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply if the student does not successfully complete some of the educational components from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should be provided in the Learning Agreement. The student will commit to reach a certain level of language competence in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in the inter-institutional agreement. In case the student would not already have this level when he/she signs the Learning Agreement, he/she commits to reach it with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the organisational support grant or with the Erasmus+ online tutored courses). All parties must sign the document; however, it is not compulsory to circulate papers with original signatures, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures may be accepted, depending on the national legislation. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added. The section to be completed during the mobility is needed only if changes have to be introduced into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept unchanged and changes should be described in this section. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a group of educational components that will be taken abroad, in the light of the course catalogue that the receiving institution has committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE holder. However, introducing changes might be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable conflicts. Other reasons for a change can be the request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date. These changes to the mobility study programme should be agreed by all parties within four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester). Any party can request changes within the first two to five-week period after regular classes/educational components have started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period following the request. In case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as timely as possible as well. Changes to the study programme abroad should be listed in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution commits to fully recognise the number of ECTS credits as presented in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Only if the changes described in table C affect the group of educational components in the student's degree (table B) that will be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion of the study programme abroad, a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: Revised group of educational components in the student's degree that will be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows and columns can be added as needed to tables C and D. ~~All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures~~ Provisions for recognition in case some educational components are not ~~mandatory~~ successfully completed are included Provide mobility programme Identify responsible persons Commitment of the three parties with original / scanned/ digital signatures. Additional educational components above the number of ECTS credits required in his/her curriculum are listed in the LA and ~~an approval by email may be enough. The procedure~~ if the sending institution will not recognise them as counting towards their degree, this has to be ~~decided~~ agreed by all parties concerned and annexed to the LA Page 1 – Information on the student and the sending ~~institution, depending on~~ and receiving institution Modifications are NOT needed Modifications ARE needed Receiving institution provides Transcript of Records to student and sending institution in period stipulated in IIA (normally max. 5 weeks after results). This section will be provided at a later date. Sending institution provides the ~~national legislation~~Recognition Document to the student within 5 weeks. 1 Country code: ISO 3166-2 country codes available at: xxxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/obp/ui/#search.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the sending institution (in table B) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad. It is necessary to fill in tables A and B thoroughly before the mobility. Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. Additional columns can also be added, for example, to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence (neither in terms of content nor in terms of credits) between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS* ECTS credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits. In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits must also be listed in the study programme outlined in table A. Where all credits in Table A are recognised as forming part of the programme at the sending institution without any further conditions being applied, Table B may be completed with a reference to the mobility window1. When mobility windows are embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B with a single line as described below: Table C Before the mobility Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the ~~sending~~ receiving institution Semester [e.g. autumn / ~~spring] [or~~ spring / term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) for the group of educational components in the student's degree that would normally be completed at the sending institution and which will be replaced by the study abroad Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the group of components will be included in Table B as follows: Table C Before the mobility Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the ~~sending~~ receiving institution Semester [e.g. autumn / ~~spring] [or~~ spring / term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits ~~Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10~~ (or equivalent) for the group of educational components in the student's degree that would normally be completed at the sending institution and which will be replaced by the study abroad Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) contained in table A if there are no changes to the study programme abroad and the student successfully completes it. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits required for his/her degree and does not need some of the credits gained abroad. Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply if the student does not successfully complete some of the educational components from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should be provided in the Learning Agreement. ~~The~~ In all cases, the student will ~~commit to reach a certain~~ report via the on-line EU survey on the full recognition by the sending institution of his/her credits achieved abroad based on what has been agreed in Table B (or table B bis in case of changes during the mobility) and its possible annexes. A recommended level ~~of language competence~~ in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in ~~the~~ their inter-institutional agreement. In The sending HEI is responsible for providing support to its nominated candidates so that they can have the recommended language skills at the start of the study period. For mobility between Programme Countries, and for the languages covered by the Erasmus+ Online Linguistic Support (OLS), the student must carry out the OLS language assessment before and at the end of the mobility period, except for native speakers. The completion of the online assessment before departure is a pre-requisite for the mobility, except in duly justified cases. This assessment will be taken after the student is selected, but before signing the Learning Agreement or, alternatively, the grant agreement, whenever agreed with the sending institution. The OLS has been designed to assist Erasmus+ students in improving their knowledge of the language in which they will study before and during their stay abroad, to ensure a better quality of learning mobility. For all mobilities, in case the level of the student ~~would not already have this level when~~ before the mobility is below the recommended one, the sending HEI and the student commit that he/she ~~signs~~ will reach the ~~Learning Agreement~~recommended level by the start of the mobility, ~~he/she commits to reach it~~ with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the ~~organisational support~~ Organisational Support grant or with the Erasmus+ ~~online tutored~~ OLS language courses, where applicable). The level of language competence that the student already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the study period has to be reported in the Learning Agreement in the box indicated below or, alternatively, in the grant agreement. The student commits to reach this reported level in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of language competence in __________ [the main language of instruction] that the student already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the study period is: A1 □ A2 □ B1 □ B2 □ C1 □ C2 □ Native speaker □ All the students who took the assessment with the Erasmus+ OLS before the mobility will also take a final assessment at the end of the mobility. More opportunities are available with OLS. Please visit xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx All parties must sign the ~~document~~Learning Agreement; however, it is not compulsory to circulate papers with original signatures, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures may be accepted, depending on the national legislation. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added. The section to be completed during the mobility is needed only if changes have to be introduced into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept unchanged and changes should be described in this section. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a group of educational components that will be taken abroad, in the light of the course catalogue that the receiving institution has committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE holder. However, introducing changes might be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable conflicts. Other reasons for a change can be the request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date. These changes to the mobility study programme should be agreed by all parties within four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester). Any party can request changes within the first two to five-week period after regular classes/educational components have started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period following the request. In case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as timely as possible as well. Changes to the study programme abroad should be listed in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution commits to fully recognise the number of ECTS credits as presented in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Only if the changes described in table C affect the group of educational components in the student's degree (table B) that will be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion of the study programme abroad, a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: Revised group of educational components in the student's degree that will be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows and columns can be added as needed to tables C and D. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory and an approval by email may be enough. The procedure has to be decided by the sending institution, depending on the national legislation.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the sending institution (in table B) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad. Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. Additional columns can also be added, for example, to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS* credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits. In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits must also be listed in the study programme outlined in ~~table~~ Table A. When mobility windows are embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B with a single line as described below: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* credits Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the group of components will be included in Table B as follows: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the ~~sending institution Semester~~ University of Art and Design | Linz Semester/ term [autumn / spring] ~~[or term]~~ Number of ~~ECTS* credits Course x~~ ECTS Bachelor-, Master- or Diploma program in:…….. Painting / industrial design/ …… ~~10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10~~ for example - Selectable courses Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* credits contained in table A if there are no changes to the study programme abroad and the student successfully completes it. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits required for his/her degree and does not need some of the credits gained abroad. Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply if the student does not successfully complete some of the educational components from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should be provided in the Learning Agreement. In all cases, the student will report via the on-line EU survey on the full recognition by the sending institution of his/her credits achieved abroad based on what has been agreed in Table B (or table D in case of changes during the mobility) and its possible annexes. The student will commit to reach a certain level of language competence in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool ~~when available~~ OLS (the results will be sent to the sending institution) ~~or else by any other mean~~ to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and the receiving institutions in the inter-institutional agreement. In case the student would not already have this level when he/she signs the Learning Agreement, he/she commits to reach it with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the organisational support grant or with the Erasmus+ online tutored ~~courses~~courses OLS). All parties must sign the document; however, it is not compulsory to circulate papers with original signatures, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures may be accepted, depending on the national legislation. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added. The section to be completed during the mobility is needed only if changes have to be introduced into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept unchanged and changes should be described in this section. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a group of educational components that will be taken abroad, in the light of the course catalogue that the receiving institution has committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE holder. However, introducing changes might be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable conflicts. Other reasons for a change can be the request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date. These changes to the mobility study programme should be agreed by all parties within four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester). Any party can request changes within the first two to five-week period after regular classes/educational components have started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period following the request. In case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as timely as possible as well. Changes to the study programme abroad should be listed in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution commits to fully recognise the number of ECTS credits as presented in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Only if the changes described in table C affect the group of educational components in the student's degree (table B) that will be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion of the study programme abroad, a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: Revised group of educational components in the student's degree that will be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows and columns can be added as needed to tables C and D. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory and an approval by email may be enough. The procedure has to be decided by the sending institution, depending on the national legislation.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of and the agreed study programme that the student will carry out ~~abroad~~during his mobility period and which the sending institution commits to give recognition upon successful completion by the student. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the ~~group~~ set of ~~educational~~ components ~~that will~~ to be replaced ~~in his/her degree~~ at sending institution upon successful completion by the ~~sending institution~~ student (in table B~~) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad~~). Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. ~~Additional columns can also be added, for example,~~ The student is recommended to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of take educational components totalling ~~60 ECTS* credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than~~ a ~~full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number~~ minimum of ~~credits~~30 ECTS credits per semester or 15 ECTS credits per trimester. In case the student ~~follows~~ would follow additional educational components ~~beyond those~~ above the required number of ECTS credits needed for his/her degree ~~programme~~curriculum, these additional credits must also be ~~listed~~ contained in the study programme outlined in table A. When there are mobility windows ~~are~~ embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B ~~with a single line as described below~~in the following way: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the ~~group~~ set of components will be included ~~in Table B~~ as follows: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10 Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* ECTS credits contained in table A ~~if there are no changes to the study programme abroad~~ and ~~the student successfully completes it. Any~~ any exception to this rule should be ~~clearly stated~~ documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all ~~parties. Example~~ parties (i.e. in case of ~~justification for non-recognition:~~ additional educational components above the ~~student has already accumulated the~~ required number of ECTS credits ~~required~~ needed for ~~his/her~~ the degree ~~and does not need some of the credits gained abroad~~curriculum). ~~Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the~~ The sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply ~~if the student does not successfully complete~~ in case some ~~of the~~ educational components ~~from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should~~ would not be ~~provided in the Learning Agreement. The student will commit to reach a certain level of language competence in the main language of instruction~~ successfully completed by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in the inter-institutional agreement. In case the student would not already have this level when he/she signs the Learning Agreement, he/she commits to reach it with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the organisational support grant or with the Erasmus+ online tutored courses)student. All parties must sign the document; however, it there is ~~not compulsory~~ no need to circulate papers with original ~~signatures,~~ signatures because scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures ~~may be accepted, depending on the national legislation~~are recognised. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is ~~used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added~~used. The section to be completed during the mobility is only needed ~~only~~ if it is necessary to introduce changes ~~have to be introduced~~ into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept ~~unchanged and~~ unchanged, changes should be described in this ~~section~~section and both parts should remain together in a single document. Requests for extension of the duration of the mobility programme should be made up to one month before the foreseen end date. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a ~~group~~ set of educational components ~~that will~~ to be taken ~~abroad, in~~ abroad and how to recognise them on the light of the course ~~catalogue~~ catalogues that the sending and receiving ~~institution has~~ institutions have committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE ~~holder~~holders. However, introducing changes ~~might~~ may be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable ~~conflicts. Other reasons for~~ conflicts or because the previously selected educational component is not available at receiving institution or it is in a ~~change can be~~ different language than previously specified in the ~~request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date~~course catalogue. These exceptional changes to the mobility study programme should be ~~agreed by all parties~~ made within ~~four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester)~~a month. Any party can request changes within the first ~~two to five~~two-week period after regular classes/educational components have ~~started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes~~started. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period ~~following~~ after the request. In the case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as well as timely as ~~possible as well~~possible. Changes to the study programme abroad should be ~~listed~~ added in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution ~~commits to~~ should fully recognise the number of ECTS credits ~~as presented~~ present in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all ~~parties~~parties as in the section before mobility. Only if the changes described in table C affect the ~~group~~ set of ~~educational~~ components ~~in the student's degree (table B) that will~~ to be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion by the student of the study programme ~~abroad~~abroad (table B), a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: ~~Revised group~~ Exceptional changes to set of ~~educational~~ components ~~in the student's degree that will~~ to be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows ~~and columns~~ can be added as needed to tables C and D. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory ~~and an approval~~ as agreement of the proposed amendments by email ~~may be enough~~is accepted. For the Programme purposes, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures are recognised as well to issue the Transcript of Records and the Recognition Document. The ~~procedure~~ receiving institution commits to provide the sending institution and the student with a Transcript of Records according to table E and containing all the educational components agreed in the table A (and table C in case there were changes to the study programme abroad). In addition, grading distribution information should be attached to the Transcript of Records (or a web link where this information can be found) in case it is different or more specific or it has been updated compared to the information provided in the Inter-institutional Agreement. This should be ~~decided~~ done within a period stipulated in the inter-institutional agreement and normally not longer than five weeks after publication/proclamation of the student’s results at the receiving institution. Following the receipt of the Transcript of Records from the receiving institution, the sending institution commits to provide to the student a Recognition Document including table E and the completed table F with the recognition outcomes, without further requirements from the student, and within five weeks. The sending institution will translate the grades received by the student (when applicable) taking into account the grading distribution information from the receiving institution. In addition, all the educational components will appear as well in the student's Diploma Supplement with also the exact title that they had in the receiving institution. The Recognition Document includes the actual start and end date of the study period, the transcript of records from the receiving institution and the recognition outcomes from the sending institution. The start date of the study period is the first day the student has been present at the receiving institution, ~~depending~~ for example, for the first course, for a welcoming event organised by the host institution or for language and intercultural courses. The end date of the study period is the last day the student has been present at the receiving institution and not his actual date of departure. This is, for example, the end of exams period, courses or mandatory sitting period. The Recognition Document must be issued together with the section before mobility (and the section during mobility if there were changes to the original Learning Agreement) and it can additionally be issued independently. P Additional educational components above the number of ECTS credits required in his/her curriculum are listed in the LA and if the sending institution will not recognise them as counting towards their degree this is agreed by all parties and annexed to the LA age 1 – Information on the ~~national legislation~~student and the sending and receiving institution Provide mobility programme Identify responsible persons Commitment of the three parties with original / scanned/ digital signatures. Provisions for recognition in case some educational components are not successfully completed are included efore mobility Pages 1-3 Modifications are NOT needed Modifications ARE needed P age 4 Receiving institution provides Transcript of Records to student and sending institution in period stipulated in IIA (normally max. 5 weeks after results). Sending institution provides the Recognition Document to the student within 5 weeks. 1 Nationality: Country to which the person belongs administratively and that issues the ID card and/or passport.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the sending institution (in table B) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad. It is necessary to fill in tables A and B thoroughly before the mobility. Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. Additional columns can also be added, for example, to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence (neither in terms of content nor in terms of credits) between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS* ECTS credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits. In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits must also be listed in the study programme outlined in table A. Where all credits in Table A are recognised as forming part of the programme at the sending institution without any further conditions being applied, Table B may be completed with a reference to the mobility window. When mobility windows are embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B with a single line as described below: Recognition at Sending Institution Table C Before the mobility Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the ~~sending~~ receiving institution Semester [e.g. autumn / ~~spring] [or~~ spring / term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) for the group of educational components in the student's degree that would normally be completed at the sending institution and which will be replaced by the study abroad Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the group of components will be included in Table B as follows: Recognition at Sending Institution Table C Before the mobility Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the ~~sending~~ receiving institution Semester [e.g. autumn / ~~spring] [or~~ spring / term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) for the group of educational components in the student's degree that would normally be completed at the sending institution and which will be replaced by the study abroad Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10 Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) contained in table A if there are no changes to the study programme abroad and the student successfully completes it. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits required for his/her degree and does not need some of the credits gained abroad. Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply if the student does not successfully complete some of the educational components from his study programme abroad. A ~~web link towards these provisions should~~ recommended level in the main language of instruction has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in their inter-institutional agreement. The sending HEI is responsible for providing support to its nominated candidates so that they can have the recommended language skills at the start of the study period. For all mobilities, in case the level of the student before the mobility is below the recommended one, the sending HEI and the student commit that he/she will reach the recommended level by the start of the mobility, with the support to be provided in by the ~~Learning Agreement~~sending or receiving institution. The ~~student will commit to reach a certain~~ level of language competence that the student already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the study period has to be reported in the Learning Agreement in the box indicated below. The student commits to reach this reported level in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of language competence in __________ [the main language of instruction] that the student ~~will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent~~ already has or agrees to ~~the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided~~ acquire by the ~~sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between~~ start of the sending and receiving institutions in the inter-institutional agreement. In case the student would not already have this level when he/she signs the Learning Agreement, he/she commits to reach it with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the organisational support grant or with the Erasmus+ online tutored courses). study period is: A1 □ A2 □ B1 □ B2 □ C1 □ C2 □ Native speaker □ All parties must sign the ~~document~~Learning Agreement; however, it is not compulsory to circulate papers with original signatures, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures may be accepted, depending on the national legislation. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added. The section to be completed during the mobility is needed only if changes have to be introduced into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept unchanged and changes should be described in this section. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a group of educational components that will be taken abroad, in the light of the course catalogue that the receiving institution has committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE holder. However, introducing changes might be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable conflicts. Other reasons for a change can be the request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date. These changes to the mobility study programme should be agreed by all parties within four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester). Any party can request changes within the first two to five-week period after regular classes/educational components have started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period following the request. In case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as timely as possible as well. Changes to the study programme abroad should be listed in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution commits to fully recognise the number of ECTS credits as presented in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Only if the changes described in table C affect the group of educational components in the student's degree (table B) that will be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion of the study programme abroad, a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: Revised group of educational components in the student's degree that will be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows and columns can be added as needed to tables C and D. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory and an approval by email may be enough. The procedure has to be decided by the sending institution, depending on the national legislation.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement, Learning Agreement

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of and the agreed study programme that the student will carry out ~~abroad~~during his mobility period and which the sending institution commits to give recognition upon successful completion by the student. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the ~~group~~ set of ~~educational~~ components ~~that will~~ to be replaced ~~in his/her degree~~ at sending institution upon successful completion by the ~~sending institution~~ student (in table B~~) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad~~). Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. ~~Additional columns can also be added, for example,~~ The student is recommended to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of take educational components totalling ~~60 ECTS* credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than~~ a ~~full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number~~ minimum of ~~credits~~30 ECTS credits per semester or 15 ECTS credits per trimester. In case the student ~~follows~~ would follow additional educational components ~~beyond those~~ above the required number of ECTS credits needed for his/her degree ~~programme~~curriculum, these additional credits must also be ~~listed~~ contained in the study programme outlined in table A. When there are mobility windows ~~are~~ embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B ~~with a single line as described below~~in the following way: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the ~~group~~ set of components will be included ~~in Table B~~ as follows: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10 Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* ECTS credits contained in table A ~~if there are no changes to the study programme abroad~~ and ~~the student successfully completes it. Any~~ any exception to this rule should be ~~clearly stated~~ documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all ~~parties. Example~~ parties (i.e. in case of ~~justification for non-recognition:~~ additional educational components above the ~~student has already accumulated the~~ required number of ECTS credits ~~required~~ needed for ~~his/her~~ the degree ~~and does not need some of the credits gained abroad~~curriculum). ~~Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the~~ The sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply ~~if the student does not successfully complete~~ in case some ~~of the~~ educational components ~~from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should~~ would not be ~~provided in the Learning Agreement. The student will commit to reach a certain level of language competence in the main language of instruction~~ successfully completed by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in the inter-institutional agreement. In case the student would not already have this level when he/she signs the Learning Agreement, he/she commits to reach it with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the organisational support grant or with the Erasmus+ online tutored courses)student. All parties must sign the document; however, it there is ~~not compulsory~~ no need to circulate papers with original ~~signatures,~~ signatures because scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures ~~may be accepted, depending on the national legislation~~are recognised. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is ~~used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added~~used. CHANGES TO THE ORIGINAL LEARNING AGREEMENT The section to be completed during the mobility is only needed ~~only~~ if it is necessary to introduce changes ~~have to be introduced~~ into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept ~~unchanged and~~ unchanged, changes should be described in this ~~section~~section and both parts should remain together in a single document. Requests for extension of the duration of the mobility programme should be made up to one month before the foreseen end date. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a ~~group~~ set of educational components ~~that will~~ to be taken ~~abroad, in~~ abroad and how to recognise them on the light of the course ~~catalogue~~ catalogues that the sending and receiving ~~institution has~~ institutions have committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE ~~holder~~holders. However, introducing changes ~~might~~ may be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable ~~conflicts. Other reasons for~~ conflicts or because the previously selected educational component is not available at receiving institution or it is in a ~~change can be~~ different language than previously specified in the ~~request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date~~course catalogue. These exceptional changes to the mobility study programme should be ~~agreed by all parties~~ made within ~~four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester)~~a month. Any party can request changes within the first ~~two to five~~two-week period after regular classes/educational components have ~~started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes~~started. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period ~~following~~ after the request. In the case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as well as timely as ~~possible as well~~possible. Changes to the study programme abroad should be ~~listed~~ added in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution ~~commits to~~ should fully recognise the number of ECTS credits ~~as presented~~ present in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all ~~parties~~parties as in the section before mobility. Only if the changes described in table C affect the ~~group~~ set of ~~educational~~ components ~~in the student's degree (table B) that will~~ to be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion by the student of the study programme ~~abroad~~abroad (table B), a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: ~~Revised group~~ Exceptional changes to set of ~~educational~~ components ~~in the student's degree that will~~ to be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows ~~and columns~~ can be added as needed to tables C and D. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory ~~and an approval~~ as agreement of the proposed amendments by email ~~may be enough~~is accepted. RECOGNITION DOCUMENT For the Programme purposes, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures are recognised as well to issue the Transcript of Records and the Recognition Document. The ~~procedure~~ receiving institution commits to provide the sending institution and the student with a Transcript of Records according to table E and containing all the educational components agreed in the table A (and table C in case there were changes to the study programme abroad). In addition, grading distribution information should be attached to the Transcript of Records (or a web link where this information can be found) in case it is different or more specific or it has been updated compared to the information provided in the Inter-institutional Agreement. This should be done within a period stipulated in the inter-institutional agreement and normally not longer than five weeks after publication/proclamation of the student’s results at the receiving institution. Following the receipt of the Transcript of Records from the receiving institution, the sending institution commits to provide to the student a Recognition Document including table E and the completed table F with the recognition outcomes, without further requirements from the student, and within five weeks. The sending institution will translate the grades received by the student (when applicable) taking into account the grading distribution information from the receiving institution. In addition, all the educational components will appear as well in the student's Diploma Supplement with also the exact title that they had in the receiving institution. The Recognition Document includes the actual start and end date of the study period, the transcript of records from the receiving institution and the recognition outcomes from the sending institution. The start date of the study period is the first day the student has been present at the receiving institution, for example, for the first course, for a welcoming event organised by the host institution or for language and intercultural courses. The end date of the study period is the last day the student has been present at the receiving institution and not his actual date of departure. This is, for example, the end of exams period, courses or mandatory sitting period. The Recognition Document must be issued together with the section before mobility (and the section during mobility if there were changes to the original Learning Agreement) and it can additionally be issued independently. Higher Education Learning Agreement form Student’s name Steps to fill in the Learning Agreement for Studies Page 1 – Information on the student and the sending and receiving institution Additional educational components above the number of ECTS credits required in his/her curriculum are listed in the LA and if Before mobility Pages 1-3 Provide mobility programme Identify responsible persons Commitment of the three parties with original / scanned/ digital signatures. the sending institution will not recognise them as counting towards their degree this is agreed by all parties and annexed to the LA Provisions for recognition in case some educational components are not successfully completed are included Exceptional changes to mobility programme should be made within one month after the start date of the studies (request for extension of the duration to be ~~decided~~ made up to one month before the foreseen end date) During mobility Modifications are NOT needed Modifications ARE needed A party requests changes in the first two- week period after the start of regular classes/educational components Agreement by email by the three parties within a two-week period after the request After mobility Receiving institution provides Transcript of Records to student and sending institution in period stipulated in IIA (normally max. 5 weeks after results). Sending institution provides the Recognition Document to the student within 5 weeks. It includes not only ECTS but also the grades provided by the sending HEIs. Higher Education Learning Agreement form Student’s name Annex 2: End notes 1 Nationality: Country to which the person belongs administratively and that issues the ID card and/or passport. 2 Study cycle: Short cycle (EQF level 5) / bachelor or equivalent first cycle (EQF level 6) / master or equivalent second cycle (EQF level 7) / doctorate or equivalent third cycle (EQF level 8). 3 The ISCED-F 2013 search tool available at xxxx://xx.xxxxxx.xx/education/tools/isced-f_en.htm should be used to find the ISCED 2013 detailed field of education and training that is closest to the subject of the degree to be awarded to the student by the sending institution~~, depending on the national legislation~~.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the sending institution (in table B) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad. It is necessary to fill in tables A and B thoroughly before the mobility. Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. Additional columns can also be added, for example, to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence (neither in terms of content nor in terms of credits) between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS* ECTS credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits. In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits must also be listed in the study programme outlined in table A. Where all credits in Table A are recognised as forming part of the programme at the sending institution without any further conditions being applied, Table B may be completed with a reference to the mobility window13. When mobility windows are embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B with a single line as described below: Recognition at Sending Institution Table C Before the mobility Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the ~~sending~~ receiving institution Semester [e.g. autumn / ~~spring] [or~~ spring / term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) for the group of educational components in the student's degree that would normally be completed at the sending institution and which will be replaced by the study abroad Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the group of components will be included in Table B as follows: Recognition at Sending Institution Table C Before the mobility Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the ~~sending~~ receiving institution Semester [e.g. autumn / ~~spring] [or~~ spring / term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) for the group of educational components in the student's degree that would normally be completed at the sending institution and which will be replaced by the study abroad Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10 Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) contained in table A if there are no changes to the study programme abroad and the student successfully completes it. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits required for his/her degree and does not need some of the credits gained abroad. Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply if the student does not successfully complete some of the educational components from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should be provided in the Learning Agreement. ~~The~~ In all cases, the student will ~~commit to reach a certain~~ report via the on-line EU survey on the full recognition by the sending institution of his/her credits achieved abroad based on what has been agreed in Table B (or table B bis in case of changes during the mobility) and its possible annexes. A recommended level ~~of language competence~~ in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in ~~the~~ their inter-institutional agreement. In The sending HEI is responsible for providing support to its nominated candidates so that they can have the recommended language skills at the start of the study period. For mobility between Programme Countries, and for the languages covered by the Erasmus+ Online Linguistic Support (OLS), the student must carry out the OLS language assessment before and at the end of the mobility period, except for native speakers. The completion of the online assessment before departure is a pre-requisite for the mobility, except in duly justified cases. This assessment will be taken after the student is selected, but before signing the Learning Agreement or, alternatively, the grant agreement, whenever agreed with the sending institution. The OLS has been designed to assist Erasmus+ students in improving their knowledge of the language in which they will study before and during their stay abroad, to ensure a better quality of learning mobility. For all mobilities, in case the level of the student ~~would not already have this level when~~ before the mobility is below the recommended one, the sending HEI and the student commit that he/she ~~signs~~ will reach the ~~Learning Agreement~~recommended level by the start of the mobility, ~~he/she commits to reach it~~ with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the ~~organisational support~~ Organisational Support grant or with the Erasmus+ ~~online tutored~~ OLS language courses, where applicable). The level of language competence that the student already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the study period has to be reported in the Learning Agreement in the box indicated below or, alternatively, in the grant agreement. The student commits to reach this reported level in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of language competence in __________ [the main language of instruction] that the student already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the study period is: A1 □ A2 □ B1 □ B2 □ C1 □ C2 □ Native speaker □ All the students who took the assessment with the Erasmus+ OLS before the mobility will also take a final assessment at the end of the mobility. More opportunities are available with OLS. Please visit xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx All parties must sign the ~~document~~Learning Agreement; however, it is not compulsory to circulate papers with original signatures, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures may be accepted, depending on the national legislation. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added. The section to be completed during the mobility is needed only if changes have to be introduced into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept unchanged and changes should be described in this section. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a group of educational components that will be taken abroad, in the light of the course catalogue that the receiving institution has committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE holder. However, introducing changes might be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable conflicts. Other reasons for a change can be the request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date. These changes to the mobility study programme should be agreed by all parties within four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester). Any party can request changes within the first two to five-week period after regular classes/educational components have started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period following the request. In case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as timely as possible as well. Changes to the study programme abroad should be listed in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution commits to fully recognise the number of ECTS credits as presented in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Only if the changes described in table C affect the group of educational components in the student's degree (table B) that will be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion of the study programme abroad, a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: Revised group of educational components in the student's degree that will be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows and columns can be added as needed to tables C and D. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory and an approval by email may be enough. The procedure has to be decided by the sending institution, depending on the national legislation.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement for Studies, Learning Agreement for Studies

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. ~~The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad.~~ The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution ~~(in table A)~~ and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the sending institution ~~(in table B)~~ upon successful completion of the study programme abroad~~. Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. Additional columns can also be added, for example, to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component~~. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables ~~A and B~~ must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS* credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits. In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits must also be listed in the study programme outlined in the table A. on the left side. When mobility windows are embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B (on the right side) with a single line as described below: Equivalent Component ~~code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [~~Title or ~~term] Number~~ Reason for non-recognition2 Nr of ~~ECTS* credits Mobility window … Total: 30~~ ECTS Otherwise, the group of components will be included in Table B on the right side as follows: Equivalent Component ~~code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [~~Title or ~~term] Number~~ Reason for non-recognition2 Nr of ~~ECTS* credits Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10 Total: 30~~ ECTS The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* credits contained in the table A on the left side if there are no changes to the study programme abroad and the student successfully completes it. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits required for his/her degree and does not need some of the credits gained abroad. Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply if the student does not successfully complete some of the educational components from his study programme abroad~~. A web link towards these provisions should be provided in the Learning Agreement~~. The student will commit to reach a certain level of language competence in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in the inter-institutional agreement. In case the student would not already have this level when he/she signs the Learning Agreement, he/she commits to reach it with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (~~either~~ with courses ~~that can be funded by~~ at the ~~organisational support grant~~ sending or receiving institution or with the Erasmus+ online tutored courses). All parties must sign the document; however, it is not compulsory to circulate papers with original signatures, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures may be accepted, depending on the national legislation. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is used and a ~~weblink~~ web link to an explanation to the system should be added. The section to be completed during the mobility is needed only if changes have to be introduced into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept unchanged and changes should be described in this section. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a group of educational components that will be taken abroad, in the light of the course catalogue that the receiving institution has committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE holder. However, introducing changes might be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable conflicts. Other reasons for a change can be the request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one ~~month~~ semester before the foreseen end date. These changes to the mobility study programme should be agreed by all parties within four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester). Any party can request changes within the first two to five-week period after regular classes/educational components have started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period following the request. In case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as timely as possible as well. Changes to the study programme abroad should be listed in ~~table C~~ the tables on page 3 and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution commits to fully recognise the number of ECTS credits as presented in ~~table C.~~ the tables on page 3. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Only if the changes described in ~~table C~~ these tables affect the group of educational components in the student's degree ~~(table B)~~ that will be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion of the study programme abroad, a revised version should be inserted and labelled ~~as "Table D~~as: Revised group of educational components in the student's degree that will be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows and columns can be added as needed to ~~tables C and D.~~ tables. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory and an approval by email may be enough. The procedure has to be decided by the sending institution, depending on the national legislation.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Learning Agreement, Learning Agreement

PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME. The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the sending institution (in table B) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad. It is necessary to fill in tables A and B thoroughly before the mobility. Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. Additional columns can also be added, for example, to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence (neither in terms of content nor in terms of credits) between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS* ECTS credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits. In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits must also be listed in the study programme outlined in table A. Where all credits in Table A are recognised as forming part of the programme at the sending institution without any further conditions being applied, Table B may be completed with a reference to the mobility window12. When mobility windows are embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B with a single line as described below: Recognition at Sending Institution Table C Before the mobility Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the ~~sending~~ receiving institution Semester [e.g. autumn / ~~spring] [or~~ spring / term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) for the group of educational components in the student's degree that would normally be completed at the sending institution and which will be replaced by the study abroad Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the group of components will be included in Table B as follows: Recognition at Sending Institution Table C Before the mobility Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the ~~sending~~ receiving institution Semester [e.g. autumn / ~~spring] [or~~ spring / term] Number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) for the group of educational components in the student's degree that would normally be completed at the sending institution and which will be replaced by the study abroad Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10 Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* ECTS credits (or equivalent) contained in table A if there are no changes to the study programme abroad and the student successfully completes it. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits required for his/her degree and does not need some of the credits gained abroad. Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply if the student does not successfully complete some of the educational components from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should be provided in the Learning Agreement. ~~The~~ In all cases, the student will ~~commit to reach a certain~~ report via the on-line EU survey on the full recognition by the sending institution of his/her credits achieved abroad based on what has been agreed in Table B (or table B bis in case of changes during the mobility) and its possible annexes. A recommended level ~~of language competence~~ in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in ~~the~~ their inter-institutional agreement. ~~In case~~ The sending HEI is responsible for providing support to its nominated candidates so that they can have the recommended language skills at the start of the study period. For mobility between Programme Countries, and for the languages covered by the Erasmus+ Online Linguistic Support (OLS), the student ~~would not already have this level when he/she signs~~ must carry out the OLS language assessment before and at the end of the mobility period, except for native speakers. The completion of the online assessment before departure is a pre-requisite for the mobility, except in duly justified cases. This assessment will be taken after the student is selected, but before signing the Learning Agreement, whenever agreed with the sending institution. The OLS has been designed to assist Erasmus+ students in improving their knowledge of the language in which they will study before and during their stay abroad, to ensure a better quality of learning mobility. For all mobilities, in case the level of the student before the mobility is below the recommended one, the sending HEI and the student commit that he/she ~~commits to~~ will reach it the recommended level by the start of the mobility, with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the ~~organisational support~~ Organisational Support grant or with the Erasmus+ ~~online tutored~~ OLS language courses, where applicable). The level of language competence that the student already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the study period has to be reported in the Learning Agreement in the box indicated below. The student commits to reach this reported level in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of language competence in __________ [the main language of instruction] that the student already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the study period is: A1 □ A2 □ B1 □ B2 □ C1 □ C2 □ Native speaker □ All the students who took the assessment with the Erasmus+ OLS before the mobility will also take a final assessment at the end of the mobility. More opportunities are available with OLS. Please visit xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx All parties must sign the ~~document~~Learning Agreement; however, it is not compulsory to circulate papers with original signatures, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures may be accepted, depending on the national legislation. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added. The section to be completed during the mobility is needed only if changes have to be introduced into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept unchanged and changes should be described in this section. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a group of educational components that will be taken abroad, in the light of the course catalogue that the receiving institution has committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE holder. However, introducing changes might be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable conflicts. Other reasons for a change can be the request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date. These changes to the mobility study programme should be agreed by all parties within four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester). Any party can request changes within the first two to five-week period after regular classes/educational components have started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period following the request. In case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as timely as possible as well. Changes to the study programme abroad should be listed in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution commits to fully recognise the number of ECTS credits as presented in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Only if the changes described in table C affect the group of educational components in the student's degree (table B) that will be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion of the study programme abroad, a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: Revised group of educational components in the student's degree that will be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows and columns can be added as needed to tables C and D. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory and an approval by email may be enough. The procedure has to be decided by the sending institution, depending on the national legislation.

Appears in 1 contract

Common use of PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME Clause in Contracts