Common use of Protection against Hacking Clause in Contracts

Protection against Hacking. Playback licenses, revocation certificates and security-critical data shall use commercially reasonable cryptographic protection methods to deter against tampering, forging, and spoofing. The content protection system shall employ industry accepted tamper-resistant technology on hardware and software components (e.g., to deter such hacks as a clock rollback, spoofing, use of common debugging tools, and intercepting unencrypted content in memory buffers). For software-only implementations on open computing platforms (e.g., personal computers), the content protection system shall employ tamper resistant software. Examples of tamper resistant software techniques include: (a) Code obfuscation example: The executable binary dynamically encrypts and decrypts itself in memory, so that the algorithm is not unnecessarily exposed to disassembly or reverse engineering.

Protection against Hacking. Playback licenses, revocation certificates certificates, and security-critical data shall use commercially reasonable cryptographic protection methods to deter be cryptographically protected against tampering, forging, and spoofing. The content protection system shall employ industry accepted tamper-resistant technology on hardware and software components (e.g., to deter prevent such hacks as a clock rollback, spoofing, use of common debugging tools, and intercepting unencrypted content in memory buffers). For software-only implementations on open computing platforms (e.g., personal computers), the content protection system shall employ tamper resistant software. Examples of tamper resistant software techniques include: (a) a. Code obfuscation example: The executable binary dynamically encrypts and decrypts itself in memory, so that the algorithm is not unnecessarily exposed to disassembly or reverse engineering.

Protection against Hacking. a. Playback licenses, revocation certificates certificates, and security-critical data shall use commercially reasonable cryptographic protection methods to deter be cryptographically protected against tampering, forging, forging and spoofing. . b. The content protection system shall employ industry industry-accepted tamper-resistant technology on hardware and software components (e.g., to deter prevent such hacks as a clock rollback, spoofing, use of common debugging tools, and intercepting unencrypted content in memory buffers). . c. For software-only implementations on open computing platforms (e.g., personal computers), the content protection system shall employ tamper tamper-resistant software. Examples of tamper tamper-resistant software techniques include: (a) i. Code obfuscation example: The executable binary dynamically encrypts and decrypts itself in memory, so that the algorithm is not unnecessarily exposed to disassembly or reverse engineering.